[AnonymousBosch]

(02-25-2015 09:44 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

The advent of tyranny comes in cute, innocent looking faces like these - propaganda has been really improved in the last decades:

Cute face, but those are the Crazy Eyes of a Dead Soul, which is why you get the cognitive-dissonance of two competing ideologies in the one body: Christianity and Marxist-Based Social Justice. Learn to recognise this look. It's how you know a girl's Inner Light has died.

Reading the thread on that Harry Potter girl the other day, I noted to myself that you can see the point in her growth where the light goes out in her eyes, never to return. Specifically, when she starts deliberate self-uglification via a Pixie Cut, and the playful celebration of her sexuality in studio shots hardens, never to fully-return.



I've noted in the past that Gamergate's Anita Sarkeesian sports the same deadness.



Heh, I've just noticed just how much she looks like a Bouncer Mate of mine in Monty Python drag. It's uncanny.

Guys might call it 'the 1000-cock stare', but I think is more about women possessing knowledge that they can't handle the psychological reality of, (most commonly that their sexual power doesn't translate to into being valued for relationships), but you also see it in rape and abuse victims, and girls who proselytize Marxist ideologies.

I have to wonder if this if this dying of the inner light is the root for the myth of Eve biting into the Apple.

I never, ever fuck these women.

Now, examine this Typist's thinking:

Quote:

"My hope is to bring a Christian leftist perspective to public discourse that is sensitive to the shape of modern American politics while remaining faithful to Christian doctrine."

In other words: "My faith isn't about respecting dogma, and quiet consideration of scripture, but whatever I cherry-pick to suit my personal whims." This is why women make such lousy priests.

This isn't how it works. I know Catholicism considers Marxism evil, and I'm not even religious. Here's a beautiful summation of why Marxism is considered sinful, and this Female Typist is an idiotic hypocrite without any reading comprehension skills whatsoever:

Quote:

Marxism is a doctrine based on atheism, on systematic hate and on the satanic sentence that the end justifies the means. This would be enough for any Christian to keep away with horror from Marxism.

Quote:

[The Bishop's conference of Columbia wrote a paper entitled] “Christian identity in the action for justice”, which denounces, referring to the theological conception of some followers of Marxism, that there is no other sin than social sin, such as the sin of economical exploitation and that the rest of sins are not important at all....

... [This is inconsistent thinking] for sin has its roots in the attitude of one’s heart. The withdrawal from the love of God and to the neighbor in any sphere, sin, in all its gloomy manifestations, prepares the ground for corruption, exploitation and injustice.

Quote:

[Contrary to Marxism] every true conversion [to Christ] means an improvement of [societal] justice

Quote:

Pope Paul VI said: “even the most idealized systems become inhuman very soon, if man’s inhuman inclinations are not corrected, if there isn’t a conversion of mind and heart of those who live under such structures or direct them”.

Quote:

...theologians supporting Marxism tend to convert the change of the economic system into a talisman, an idol to which they sacrifice everything, hoping in vain that such a change will solve all the troubles of man and of society, as if the mere change of economical structures would automatically bring the change in the heart of men.

Quote:

“[Marxism] doesn’t try to solve the injustices through the conversion of unjust people, but through the violent destruction of the adversary; with a Manichean attitude it looks at him as an absolute and irremediable evil. Therefore, it replaces an injustice with another injustice and Christian charity, which commands to love even our enemies, with systematic hate”.

And here is this idiotic girl summed up in a nutshell:

Quote:

“In order to sustain their theories, they misread the Holy Scripture and try to back the basic features of their ideology on it. “They pretend to find there a political, revolutionary and subversive Christ as the only possible interpretation of the person and the work of Jesus. According to this point of view (….), they are also determined to change the vision of the Church, redefining it and changing it into a valid tool for revolution. They also fabricate a different Church whose mere temporary option forces her to compromise with Marxist socialism”.

WNB, but would ex-communicate.