[Paracelsus]

(10-27-2014 03:17 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(10-27-2014 12:39 AM)blacknwhitespade Wrote:  

(03-16-2014 01:43 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(03-16-2014 01:38 AM)Captain Gh Wrote:  

Now I'm just laughing at these broads since I can see their painful futures hehe!!

Not only do they not have a painful future ahead of them, but even if you tried to explain to a modern woman why college is a waste of her time, she won't believe you. And if you explain to an older woman that she wasted her youth, there's only a small chance she'll be honest enough to admit her mistakes.

Even women who fuck up royally usually invent 100 lies and excuses to avoid any personal responsibility, and as long as they were obedient little worker slaves they will have enough money for themselves until they die.

No punishment, no consequences, total denial.

Fact is... most women don't give a shit about the future. As long as they have money, they don't care at all.

Women may face no consequences in terms of laws or social stigmas, however, many are ultimately suffering big time in the dating market. If you can't find any examples around you, do a simple google search, the internet is loaded with stories. Even mainstream publications are commenting on the dilemma modern women face in dating/marriage: Why Women Can't Find a Good Man. There are statistically not enough single, employed/educated men to go around for upper-middle class women. Dalrock illustrated this beautifully here: More Grim News for Carousellers. This is the course many women are running in America these days and it's becoming almost comical.

As CRR says, its because American women are too picky given their low value, not that they have a lack of options. It's not, "There are no good men," but instead, "No man is good enough."

When you remember feminism is at core sexism against men, I think it was Milton Friedman who made the strongest economic case against anti-discriminatory legislation: "Discrimination is its own punishment."

For example, any Olympic track team that chose to remain lily-white solely for Nazi reasons these days would never pick up a gold medal, simply because the fastest men in these sports are now overwhelmingly black.

What's not appreciated is that discrimination in favour of one gender, or skin colour, is just as destructive as discrimination against, because it allows whoever's the favoured party to coast on their colour or genitals at the expense of the others, resulting in a less efficient organisation all round.

Going slightly away from topic, people like to point at Obama and call him the fulfilment of Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech. Nothing could be further from the truth. MLK said he had a dream that people would not be judged on the colour of their skin, but on the content of their character. When you look at the reasons Obama took and retained office, they have precious little to do with Obama's character and plenty to do with his colour.