[Moma]

I agree with old nem on this. I still don't see the purpose of being armed as it will just result in more homicides. This will put the power into the ordinary man to be able to blast on somebody who pisses him off. It's easier for one person to kill more people with a gun than it is to kill the same amount with knives or fists.

Now in regards to your Columbine and Norway examples, killa, you are taking extremes. You have to look at overall statistical spread.

Hype people love to point at extreme cases and say "Oh, if the regular person had a gun they would be able to take the law into their own hands"

The Norway man was a normal man I gather (meaning he had no criminal record prior). He was obviously a secret sociopath. You have sociopaths in every society and by allowing guns to be easily accessible, means you make it easier for sociopaths to kill people.

How many massacre issues has America had involving someone just going apeshyt with the guns?

I can recall three off the top.

1) The disgruntled worker on the New York Subway in the 90's who just dumped on all the passengers.

2) Columbine

3) The Asian kid in Virginia.

And permitting teachers to be armed..are you for real?

Why not just abolish police and just let citizens run they own shyt?

Let the strongest survive.

And after guns, what next should be permissible?