Quote: (10-13-2014 12:09 PM)Enigma Wrote:
Did he really need to explain why having sex with an animal should be against the law?
I don't think it should. Just because one has no interest in bestiality (or "zoophilia" as the article hilariously refers to it), or even finds it morally abhorrent, doesn't mean we need a law against it.
Put me in the libertarian camp of thinking that we don't need a law to right every perceived wrong in the universe. Also put me in the camp that thinks that "animal rights" is an oxymoron; to me this counts as a victimless crime and hence should not be a crime at all.