You know the type.
They aren't ripped.
Typically pasty.
Balding or Bald.
And in terms of style, let's say you wouldn't be able to pick them out in a club, as they'd look like all the other t-shirt and jean wearing chodes posted up along the walls. Maybe some tacky jewelry and that Conan leather bracelet sourced from H&M
I'm sure dude's personal mental image is that of
![[Image: 5097898_f520.jpg]](http://s1.hubimg.com/u/5097898_f520.jpg)
when in reality he looks more like
![[Image: Al-Murray-001.jpg]](https://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/9/10/1252596713861/Al-Murray-001.jpg)
Visually, these guys have very little going for them.
Yet to hear them tell it, they're bagging chicks like this on a bi-weekly basis
![[Image: tumblr_na2844G4gw1sndpyso1_400.gif]](https://33.media.tumblr.com/6576c8a62e6765647b611e8a464e4804/tumblr_na2844G4gw1sndpyso1_400.gif)
Roosh is a fairly decent looking guy, his swarthy looks aside.
Paul Janka, i've heard has been compared to a Young Kennedy.
Tucker Max is the stereotypical tall jock blonde doofus/asshole.
VK and Good Looking Loser are both meatheads.
^Each of these guys fits some archetype of a good looking guy.
But then there are just a whole bunch of other regular looking, if not somewhat ugly looking dudes out there that are selling products. e-books, books, smart phone apps, web seminars, bootcamps, personal coaching.
Look wise they seriously run the gamut.
________________
The typical student of the game runs these questions through their heads
Can I believe them?
Can I believe what they say?
Can I trust their philosophy? strategy? Their tactics?
To me, that's pretty much a boring question.
There's really not much to explore there.
What happens when the ugly game guru tries to square his "ugliness" and his "success"?
If an ugly guy can get laid with attractive women on a fairly regular basis, and isn't paying them to do so, can it be anything other than game?
So why do these game gurus set limits on themselves and limits on their readers and prospective clients?
"Game works for me, but there are limits to what game can do."
Or you'll hear guys talk say something, "Game basically adds a +2 to your SMV"
They'll say this to you.
You know what they look like.
But they'll claim they just bagged some 19 year old Czech chick "who could be a model"
The numbers never add up to me.
And they never seem to add the #'s up.
Meanwhile, they're steady telling you that the best is not attainable.
Not even for themselves...whilst they do it anyway.
Dissonance of ugly game gurus.
WIA
They aren't ripped.
Typically pasty.
Balding or Bald.
And in terms of style, let's say you wouldn't be able to pick them out in a club, as they'd look like all the other t-shirt and jean wearing chodes posted up along the walls. Maybe some tacky jewelry and that Conan leather bracelet sourced from H&M
I'm sure dude's personal mental image is that of
when in reality he looks more like
Visually, these guys have very little going for them.
Yet to hear them tell it, they're bagging chicks like this on a bi-weekly basis
Roosh is a fairly decent looking guy, his swarthy looks aside.
Paul Janka, i've heard has been compared to a Young Kennedy.
Tucker Max is the stereotypical tall jock blonde doofus/asshole.
VK and Good Looking Loser are both meatheads.
^Each of these guys fits some archetype of a good looking guy.
But then there are just a whole bunch of other regular looking, if not somewhat ugly looking dudes out there that are selling products. e-books, books, smart phone apps, web seminars, bootcamps, personal coaching.
Look wise they seriously run the gamut.
________________
The typical student of the game runs these questions through their heads
Can I believe them?
Can I believe what they say?
Can I trust their philosophy? strategy? Their tactics?
To me, that's pretty much a boring question.
There's really not much to explore there.
What happens when the ugly game guru tries to square his "ugliness" and his "success"?
If an ugly guy can get laid with attractive women on a fairly regular basis, and isn't paying them to do so, can it be anything other than game?
So why do these game gurus set limits on themselves and limits on their readers and prospective clients?
"Game works for me, but there are limits to what game can do."
Or you'll hear guys talk say something, "Game basically adds a +2 to your SMV"
They'll say this to you.
You know what they look like.
But they'll claim they just bagged some 19 year old Czech chick "who could be a model"
The numbers never add up to me.
And they never seem to add the #'s up.
Meanwhile, they're steady telling you that the best is not attainable.
Not even for themselves...whilst they do it anyway.
Dissonance of ugly game gurus.
WIA