Would a woman who wanted to get surgery to become a man start getting accused of possessing "male privilege" after the procedure was complete?
If trans-gender people are a thing, then what about trans-ethnic? If some white boy in the US decided that he reeeaaly likes anime and Nintendo and that he was actually Japanese at heart, could he start calling himself Japanese or is he just "appropriating" (to use a word SJWs love) Japanese culture? If a black person wanted to be white, is he just being self-hating due to the oppressive white Christian male patriarchy or are the people hating on him just being "transethincphobic". Would he be considered to have white privilege once he decided to come out as white?
As insane as radfems are, at least they are consistent in their positions so they typically don't end up heading towards all the absurd conclusions I was using above as examples of modern feminist/SWPL batshittery. To pick something less crazy, look at the positions about female sexuality and sex work occupied by both radfem/2nd wave feminists and contrast it with positions held by the new generation Jezebel/XOjane reading feminists you see today. The former state that all porn, all matter of sex work is degrading and objectifying towards women - an extreme view but one that is consistent across the board. With the latter, they chatter on about being sex positive and the right to become porn stars or send nudes to whoever they want since "it's my body, my choice" but then when there's a backlash to their actions then they go off about "slut shamming" - what you are allowed to have your opinions but other people aren't or when they get pregnant they demand that the state take on the burden they have placed on the shoulders on society - but I thought you were a strong independent woman that doesn't need any man, with the state being the biggest man of them all? The most absurd and contradictory of their complaints is how one moment they'll be talking about how empowered they feel when they do anything sexual but when they get sexual attention then they suddenly shrivel?
Radfems start off with premises that I find idiotic but then they at least mostly logically draw the conclusions that would follow from these premises if they were true. The 3rd generation feminists on the hand just throw a bunch of randomly unconnected ideas - mostly whatever the trendy SWPL progressive cause of the month together into a huge mish-mash of intellectual mush which leads to all their maddening webs of speculation on privilege, shaming, gaslighting and other strange ideas that sometimes conflict and contradict with their foundational ideas. This new generation of feminists have little structure in their thoughts - the one constant that I can identify is that they want to do whatever they want and at the same time they still want you and everyone else to both assist in what they want to do AND they want you to pay when things go wrong.
If trans-gender people are a thing, then what about trans-ethnic? If some white boy in the US decided that he reeeaaly likes anime and Nintendo and that he was actually Japanese at heart, could he start calling himself Japanese or is he just "appropriating" (to use a word SJWs love) Japanese culture? If a black person wanted to be white, is he just being self-hating due to the oppressive white Christian male patriarchy or are the people hating on him just being "transethincphobic". Would he be considered to have white privilege once he decided to come out as white?
As insane as radfems are, at least they are consistent in their positions so they typically don't end up heading towards all the absurd conclusions I was using above as examples of modern feminist/SWPL batshittery. To pick something less crazy, look at the positions about female sexuality and sex work occupied by both radfem/2nd wave feminists and contrast it with positions held by the new generation Jezebel/XOjane reading feminists you see today. The former state that all porn, all matter of sex work is degrading and objectifying towards women - an extreme view but one that is consistent across the board. With the latter, they chatter on about being sex positive and the right to become porn stars or send nudes to whoever they want since "it's my body, my choice" but then when there's a backlash to their actions then they go off about "slut shamming" - what you are allowed to have your opinions but other people aren't or when they get pregnant they demand that the state take on the burden they have placed on the shoulders on society - but I thought you were a strong independent woman that doesn't need any man, with the state being the biggest man of them all? The most absurd and contradictory of their complaints is how one moment they'll be talking about how empowered they feel when they do anything sexual but when they get sexual attention then they suddenly shrivel?
Radfems start off with premises that I find idiotic but then they at least mostly logically draw the conclusions that would follow from these premises if they were true. The 3rd generation feminists on the hand just throw a bunch of randomly unconnected ideas - mostly whatever the trendy SWPL progressive cause of the month together into a huge mish-mash of intellectual mush which leads to all their maddening webs of speculation on privilege, shaming, gaslighting and other strange ideas that sometimes conflict and contradict with their foundational ideas. This new generation of feminists have little structure in their thoughts - the one constant that I can identify is that they want to do whatever they want and at the same time they still want you and everyone else to both assist in what they want to do AND they want you to pay when things go wrong.