First off, there's nothing little about Lindy.
Second, although her entire screed is one that reads identically when pointed at feminism rather than the 'MRA' menace Lindy attacks, the core of her argument - and one I've seen repeated ad nauseum by the Jezebel commentariat - is a No True Scotsman fallacy: that only the most misogynistic, bitter basement virgins qualify as MRAs. She actually states in that piece that other men are able to advance the same mens rights issues without a concomitant hatred for women, but these men who advocate for mens rights are not Mens Rights Advocates because the latter are misogynists who hate women.
Remember, in the updated American doublespeak, if you're a "feminist," you're actually pushing for equality and rights, not female power; but if you're a "mens rights advocate," you're pushing for male power, not rights or equality.
Second, although her entire screed is one that reads identically when pointed at feminism rather than the 'MRA' menace Lindy attacks, the core of her argument - and one I've seen repeated ad nauseum by the Jezebel commentariat - is a No True Scotsman fallacy: that only the most misogynistic, bitter basement virgins qualify as MRAs. She actually states in that piece that other men are able to advance the same mens rights issues without a concomitant hatred for women, but these men who advocate for mens rights are not Mens Rights Advocates because the latter are misogynists who hate women.
Remember, in the updated American doublespeak, if you're a "feminist," you're actually pushing for equality and rights, not female power; but if you're a "mens rights advocate," you're pushing for male power, not rights or equality.