[Handsome Creepy Eel]

Let me clarify my earlier comment. For a theory of female Alphaness/Betaness to make sense, it has to be consistent. But as soon as beta orbiters, confidence, sexual skills and sexual aggression are thrown into the mix, it becomes wacky and stops making sense.

For example...



... look at this whale who recently bragged about having a hot athletic boyfriend who weighs less than her. She also has a YouTube channel with thousands of followers and many Beta orbiters. But is she Alpha? Is she the top of womankind? Fuck no. She's a fat cow. No one wants her except seriously deranged people. She will always remain a fat cow even if she gathers a million Beta orbiters, and it will be obvious to anyone who takes one look at her.

What about a very hot, thin, 18-year old girl...



... who is shy, bad in bed, always goes for jerks and has been pumped and dumped over 20 times now? Is she Beta, meaning that she's "meh" as female value goes? Of course not. She's hot, young and thin, and could have almost any man (if she wanted). They wouldn't care about her shyness or poor sexual history. Even if they did, she would still have plenty of opportunities to overcome all of her flaws... simply because she's hot, and it's obvious from just a glance.

It is demonstrable that female beauty is the only variable that makes her Alpha or Beta. And since it all boils down to just one variable, it becomes pointless to invent another name for it. It's red pill geekery with no benefit and no goal. Just call it "beauty" and leave it at that. The Alpha/Beta scale is meant for men, whose sexual attractiveness depends on at least 10 different factors and is far more fluid.