Quote: (05-02-2013 05:12 AM)Menace Wrote:
They should not have made it retroactive.
In reading the governor's comments, I feel that he would have signed it if not for the retroactive portion of the bill.
He does have a point with this as just instantly stopping payments would likely cause some hardship. The way to get around that is to make the retroactive payments stop at a set future date so the broads can get their shit in order versus living off their ex's for the rest of their lives.
I chuckle when I see a kneejerk reaction about it being a Republican that vetoed it, as it was brought before the legislature by republicans and voted for by republicans.
The thing to remember is both sides of the aisle court the women's vote. Neither is beyond pandering.