[brianmark]

(08-26-2012 06:42 AM)BigAlexBoss Wrote:  

My last post was from my smartphone so I couldn't be arsed to type more.

Why Paul Janka and Jeremy Soul are shit

Janka is 6 foot+ and looks like a male catwalk model. His original free "Getting laid in NY" pdf (google it) contains anything of value he has contributed to the community which is basically live in an urban megametropolis to facilitate the law of truly large numbers (NY and now london where he lives) go indirect "Excuse me do yo uknow where the law campus is?" on hundreds of girls, limiting interactions to 2 minutes and then number closing quickly. If she doesn't number close, eject, move to the next. There is literally no value added for the average RVFer who doesn't look like Janka. Roosh's Daybang shits on Janka from a great height.

Soul's daygame book is 95% Magic Bullets (superb book, superior to Bang IMO) with 5% rubbish newbie daygame advice. Respect because hes an average looking Indian dude which will make daygame all the harder.

Justin Wayne

The takehome with Mr Wayne is that his infields demonstrate a lot of daygame techiniques well applied. He has game. Hes been teasing with his dominoes secret magic technique for months now and as far as I'm concerned he can shove it up his ass. Theres nothing new in daygame that Mr Wayne has discovered. If hes using an MTV fraud to get bangs, more credit to him. I love disruptive innovations.

Instant Date post day approach

After an approach has gone at least 10 minutes (take note Mr Janka, his flake rate would be astronomical with his 2 minute closes if he didn't look like an extra from New York fashion week) you should push strongly for an instant date at a coffee shop etc. It reduces your flake percentages enormously and is solid game - of course you don't call it an instant date

Last resort is the number close but make sure you go over 15 minutes if you can and get into some comfort topics.

Direct vs Indirect in Daygame

I could write a book on this topic but here is the summary:

Direct daygame will hurt you unless you look like Janka. Don't do it.

Your default will be indirect-direct "Excuse me, can I just say something, I was just over there having a coffee when I saw you pass - your walk is really really sexy, the way your hips sway...... but I'm not sure about your shoes, whats going on with them?" You are making it clear you are a male sexual being and are interested in her as more than just friends but with the tease on the end and the very light sexualisation she is not 100% sure of your intentions. Game on.

Full indirect "Excuse me, do you know the way to the nearest pet shop?" is daygame training wheels and should be used when you are starting off. Daygame vets will use indirect where the girl does not have an easy escape from the conversation, for example she's sat down in a coffee shop working. In this situation to go direct or indirect-direct would put an enormous amount of social pressure on her and more likely lead to a DOA approach.

All my bangs are from daygame with the odd internet bang.

Daygame.com

Yeah the website is quite commercial and well put together but they have a lot of free videos available in the blog and the Daygame Blueprint is the most comprehensive daygame model out there.

Hope this helps [/u]

Thanks for the review of Paul Janka. What I did notice is about his series videos of approaching girls in Austin, TX is that his number closes are the absolute lowest level of number close. Such as, "I'm new in town, can I have your number in case I get lost". Sometimes Southern girls can be nice and helpful. He has built no attraction between him and the girl when closes the number. As you said he then moves on to film the next successful close. He's basically is a 9 and looks like a male model (I'm not sure what a 10 is) and he should be doing as well or even better than he does.

Krauser's success in running Daygame in London cannot be repeated maybe anywhere in the USA. Only NYC is slightly comparable. He has unlimited access to girls from all over the world that are new in town. Most USA cities are driving cities so where do you Daygame. Also USA has a much lower percentage of girls from all over the world than London. It's 100 times more productive being a flagger in London than Charlotte, NC. So location is VERY important.