Quote: (12-10-2012 09:33 PM)John Galt2 Wrote:
Quote: (12-10-2012 05:47 PM)caligula89 Wrote:
I think you're right Neo. I'm going to pay for an eHarmony account when I move at the end of the month and see if it's just that the paid sites get better response rates.
Just my $0.02 - like some of the other posters stated, it depends on your game. For myself, I am a highly educated (somewhat cultured) 38 year old professional. I clean up on Match, where the girls are looking to date a guy seriously (most of the time at least) whereas the OKC crowd would be much more impressed with my 6 pack abs than my MBA from the University of Chicago. As far as Eharmony, the crowd might be even more seriously looking than Match but its filled with ugly women. They dont let you search and send you 7 "matches" per day. I literally rejected 2,000 women (I kept track to amuse myself) and was interested and had dates with two women. Not a great ratio, though one of the two I did date for a one year (solid 8 tall filipina). Eharmony is like playing the Lotto...with similar odds.
From my understanding, Eharmony focuses on more scientific/personality factors when trying to match people, and basically tries to eliminate looks to a certain extent? Don't you have to answer a ton of questions?
"The best kind of pride is that which compels a man to do his best when no one is watching."