Quote:Quote:
It's a very very small demographic we're talking about though. 5% maximum (some estimates as low as 3%) of men are homosexual and it's even smaller for females so same-sex couples adopting is not going to have a macro effect on society, especially because the majority will be gay men adopting female children.
And the rights and needs of those individuals when they are children are secondary to the civil rights of gay couples then? They mean nothing at all? Sacrificial lamb to the proverbial slaughter? This is not about the effect on greater society, its about putting children into homes where genders have been removed and replaced by what is nothing more than quasi inter-gender dominance trying to define a role in the relationship.
No ways, there is no middle ground on this. Girls need their mothers too, and no effeminate man is going to do that job. Kids need their mothers and their fathers, ideally under the same roof where the father is the head of the home. Fuck ANYONE who takes issue with that too. Conclusive evidence shows that this environment produces stable, well adjusted children far more frequently than single parent homes. And gay homes are going to be fucked up versions of single parent homes because gender roles are blurred even further.
Denying children mothers or fathers so that we can make progressive, liberal statements has to be one of the most irresponsible things we could do. It might only be a small segment of the population who is adopted, but the rights of that individual should not be pissed on just so that homosexuals can play house or because men lacking principle are too fucking weak to find their balls and say no.
There is no compromise on this shit, esp for guys on this forum who have all taken a heavy stance against feminism. Its such a hypocritical point of view its not funny.
Either you believe gender roles are the natural order, or you believe they are a social construct. The only man of principle who could support gay adoption would be a man who believes gender is a social construct, which makes him a feminist by default. The alternative is a man without principle who acknowledges the importance of gender roles and accepts it as the natural order, only to ignore it because it does not suit the outcome he wants or needs.