[Leonard D Neubache]

Coming from an Australian this will seem like tall poppy syndrome but that's not what's intended.

PPT operates in a world that most of you guys will never actually get a look in to unless you're waiting a bar there. He has the money and the game to pipeline 8's, 9's and the occasional 10. He doesn't have to compromise and in a way that's entirely the point he's trying to make.

Back in the 80's and to a lesser extent the 90's and 00's you didn't have wonder what that "thicc(ccc)" girl would look like with 10 less pounds. She never had them in the first place. Back then the guys lowering themselves to pork "thicc(ccc)" girls were doing just that. Lowering themselves. Is that plus sized model bangable? Sure. But the guys capable of banging her would have passed her over 20 or 30 years ago. There is a vast percentage of women who have dropped an SMV rating to the point where they have literally altered the SMV scale. To get any real idea of how this works you'd have to find someone old enough who could recollect these eras faithfully enough to tell you that a 7 in 2020 was a 6 in 2000 and a 5 in 1980. Maybe not precisely because it's all a bit granular but you get the idea.

Now in PPT's case he doesn't have to compromise. He sees things from the top of the scale, and at the top of the scale a 9 or a 10 is the same as it ever was in recent history, but he sees "thiccc(ccc)" girls like that Sofia Jamora chick being put on a runway where only legitimate 8's+ should be treading and he understands that the entire system of expectations has been reduced.

It might seem lofty to you but he's right. Standards are dropping and if he's the only one that sees it then it's because he's the only one that has access to the 9's, 10's and former 8's who are now somehow 8.5's ONLY because all the other chicks are getting fatter.

The bottom line is this. Guys might prefer curvy girls over skinny ones but the crucial line between overweight and underweight is the thigh gap. In that Sofia Jamora video? Good luck finding it. The pictures where she's 5 to 10 pounds lighter? That's a thigh gap you could ride a horse through. Sign me up. Otherwise PPT is right. It's a butchery of standards for women and she has no rightful place on the runway.

Get real here, guys. This is the difference for a man between having muscle tone and being a softbody. You can be a soft-body and not have a blubberous gut but we all know that if you're a softbody then you've dropped an entire SMV point at least. What's not OK for a man in also not OK for a woman.

Man: Softbody = -1SMV
Woman: No thigh gap = -1SMV

This is how it's viewed accurately from the upper echelons. At ground level it's easy to get sloppy if everyone else is and pretend that it's just the new normal.

Take a look at 100 random pictures of women from the 1950's. Not all of them were pretty but virtually all of them were an appropriate weight (or under). Physical jobs. Natural food. And yes, expectations of not being disgustingly slothful. If the women of the 50's arrived in the West today they would promptly undercut the ones already here in virtually every way (before begging to be taken back when they couldn't find enough worthy men to wed them). Same genetics. Different food. Different lifestyle. Different expectations.