[nomadbrah]

I think we're gonna have a hard time, if you discount the "aryan invasion theory", which is the consensus theory now with very little resistance outside hindu nationalists. Are you a hindu nationalist? Not that there's anything wrong with that, but there is really a lot of evidence now.

Even in India, this is settled now:

http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science...090301.ece

Quote:

did Indo-European language speakers, who called themselves Aryans, stream into India sometime around 2,000 BC – 1,500 BC when the Indus Valley civilisation came to an end, bringing with them Sanskrit and a distinctive set of cultural practices? Genetic research based on an avalanche of new DNA evidence is making scientists around the world converge on an unambiguous answer: yes, they did.

You didn't need genetics of course. Any unbiased scholar would put two and two together when Sanskrit is an indo-european language:



Those first 3, depending on the transliteration into english script, is pretty much exactly old norse pronunciation.

Even today, Icelandic has these:



Either European people migrated into India and brought their language with them or Indians migrated into Europe. There was never any evidence at all of an indian migration anywhere, so it was rather obvious.