rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Is "reverse cowgirl" a weak (non dominant) beta male sex position ?
#53

Is "reverse cowgirl" a weak (non dominant) beta male sex position ?

Quote: (03-31-2018 09:52 AM)H1N1 Wrote:  

Quote: (03-31-2018 09:24 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

Quote: (03-31-2018 08:50 AM)H1N1 Wrote:  

The key, not shown in any of those pictures, is to have her legs inside your own. This allows plenty of testicular freedom and comfort.

That sort of position makes the pussy much tighter, and makes penetration, in-and-out, thrusting, and her "riding" you even more difficult if you have big girth (thick circumference).

That position is for "thinner" dudes only.


And even if you manage...the man is still lying flat on his back with the girl facing the other way, and almost all of the issues I pointed out still apply.

Perhaps deliriums induced by no fap have banished fonder memories, but there are plenty of minuscule young starlets capable of taking heroic wangs, with great force and velocity, in just about every position conceivable. Reverse cowgirl, legs together or akimbo, is just one of the more mundane of these positions.

The 'issues' you pointed out are all non-issues. The idea that fucking luscious pussy is in any way, or indeed in any position, a 'beta' act, is just silly.

I read this wrong bud, thought for a moment you were on the NoFap train!

Come on in brother, you will be saved [Image: lol.gif]

They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety- Benjamin Franklin, as if you didn't know...
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)