Quote: (02-17-2012 02:42 PM)durangotang Wrote:
Quote: (02-17-2012 01:20 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:
Quote: (02-17-2012 12:13 PM)Samseau Wrote:You seem to be incapable of understanding that words and concepts change meaning over time, as they become integrated into other cultures. It doesn't fucking matter what left-wing or right-wing meant 150+ years ago. RIGHT NOW, left-wing is closely aligned with liberal and right-wing is closely aligned with conservative.
Nothing. Nothing at all. They stayed mostly neutral. Why? Because not a single one of our founding fathers were "left-wing" or "right-wing", which has to do with Marxist/Socialism bullshit. They didn't want to get embroiled in a senseless war to fight for "left-wing" or "right-wing" ideals, as they mostly knew back then it was fucking crap.
No, the left-wing is closely aligned with neo-liberalism and the right-wing is closely aligned with neo-conservatism. In practice both neo-liberals and neo-conservatives love the power of the state and are fascists. Republicans don't cut spending and democrats continue to wage war.
Ron Paul is by definition a classical liberal.
This is correct.
Bush, Obama and Romney are fascists.
No one seems to realize this.
I like Classic Liberalism:
Classical liberalism places a particular emphasis on the sovereignty of the individual, with private property rights being seen as essential to individual liberty.