[pants]

(04-19-2017 06:20 PM)pants Wrote:  

(04-19-2017 04:42 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Do you mean that if Americans revert their CO2 emission levels to 2015 rates, then America will have a drastically altered climate in 2065?

Or to you mean that if the entire world reverts its CO2 levels to 2015 rates, then the entire world will have a drastically altered climate in 2065?

No Or, just yes. How much? I dont know. Scientist tries to build models to simulate it. How good their simulations are i can't say.

What i can say;
CO2 is a greenhouse gas, humans pump more of it into the atmosphere, constantly increasing the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere.

If we do not belive human CO2 is dominant factor to the latest global warming, we gotta come up with a better theory, or admit it is something we do not understand about the climate. Since we do not understand it, lets research it, and document it so we can make good decision based on solid data in the future.

(04-19-2017 08:14 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

pants Wrote:

No Or, just yes. How much? I dont know. Scientist tries to build models to simulate it. How good their simulations are i can't say.

What i can say;

I've twice asked you to clarify your quote, but you never did.

And i have twice tried to answer your question. Could you link me the exact quote.


If i may rephrase your question:

"Do you mean that if Americans revert their CO2 emission levels to 2015 rates, then America will have a drastically altered climate in 2065?

Or to you mean that if the entire world reverts its CO2 levels to 2015 rates, then the entire world will have a drastically altered climate in 2065?"

To an analogy.
You live in an air-conditioned house, and its pretty warm outside.

Do you mean if i open up the kitchen window. The temperature would change in my kitchen?

Or

If i open all the windows in my entire house would the temperature in my entire house change?

To this i would just have to say yes. It would get hotter inside. What would the actual temperature be inside? This I defiantly can't say cause there are too many unknown variables. And even if i did not it would take quite a lot of simulation. And if we were to talk about the planet, it would be even harder.
Does this answer your question?

(04-20-2017 12:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

This thread is for lazy Trump haters who can't be bothered to read through the actual Trump thread and figure out the more nuanced arguments we have for Trump. So they post here and more generous people come and educate them.

The title of the thread is Donald trump is a Fraud. Of course its not nuanced.
I can find positive things to say about trump, but at this board it would just be repetition of what others have said. If i were to discuss with liberal friends who could not find anything positive to say about trump. I would highlight other aspects of his presidency than what i do in this thread.