8 y.o. threatened with life sentence for receiving underwear pics from 13 y.o. girl
02-19-2017, 03:21 AM
It would not be surprising if those US states where there are Romeo & Juliet provisions suddenly caused a national debate by some feminazi cunt who believes that all men are rapists, while she is on Omegele or Snapchat to message some 8-year-old boy to fuck her in the classroom during recess.
Anyways, the argument was that the 13-year-old girl sent pics of herself in underwear, which shouldn't constitute the treshold for "child pornography" because she wasn't naked, her pussy wasn't showing, her anus wasn't showing, her tits (if she has any) weren't showing (though Slutwalk feminazis claim that "breasts aren't sexual" when they pose naked in front of little children), so other words, the chick wasn't considered "naked" or in a "sexually provocative" position.
Regarding the comparisons of 13-year-old females wearing skimpy ass-cheek showing bikinis in a local swimming pool, you should know that most likely those chicks are dressing like that for Bill Clinton & Jeffrey Epstein on the Lolita Express.
Those hypergamous jailbait 12 to 15-year-old chicks you see dressed in short booty shorts where the pussy crease is exposed, or those butt-showing bikinis are peacocking & advertising themselves to become a "PIZZA" for Bill Clinton or the local Chief of Police, elite class of people.
This is the reason why the same people who enforce bizarre laws to put consenting teens in jail are the ones to travel to Lolita Express island to east some pizza from a 5 or 6-year-old girl. Those elite class of people are above the law.
Why do you think when an elite person like a police officer, doctor or lawyer is accused of sex crimes against minors, the first thing that usually happens is that they get reported to the organization which investigates their own rather than end up in prison, unless it's numerous complaints over a decade of "investigation"? Yet if an 18-year-old receives a sexy pic from his 17-year-old girlfriend with a phat ass, the SWAT team arrives to take him away?
One law for the PIZZA eaters at the Lolita Express, and Draconian laws for the average citizen. When you see these 8 to 15-year-old females dressing scantily at the swimming pool, while claiming that all boys in their class are rapists, they are likely PIZZA for Bill Clinton & Hitler y Clinton to munch on via Lolita Express.
Unfortunately, after being consumed like PIZZA thousands of times by Bill Clinton, when those same 8 to 15-year-old females later turn into adults & enter college, they end up making the campuses in DEFCOCK 1. Way to fucking go Bill Clinton you fucking Pizza eater/sarc.
Anyways, the argument was that the 13-year-old girl sent pics of herself in underwear, which shouldn't constitute the treshold for "child pornography" because she wasn't naked, her pussy wasn't showing, her anus wasn't showing, her tits (if she has any) weren't showing (though Slutwalk feminazis claim that "breasts aren't sexual" when they pose naked in front of little children), so other words, the chick wasn't considered "naked" or in a "sexually provocative" position.
Regarding the comparisons of 13-year-old females wearing skimpy ass-cheek showing bikinis in a local swimming pool, you should know that most likely those chicks are dressing like that for Bill Clinton & Jeffrey Epstein on the Lolita Express.
Those hypergamous jailbait 12 to 15-year-old chicks you see dressed in short booty shorts where the pussy crease is exposed, or those butt-showing bikinis are peacocking & advertising themselves to become a "PIZZA" for Bill Clinton or the local Chief of Police, elite class of people.
This is the reason why the same people who enforce bizarre laws to put consenting teens in jail are the ones to travel to Lolita Express island to east some pizza from a 5 or 6-year-old girl. Those elite class of people are above the law.
Why do you think when an elite person like a police officer, doctor or lawyer is accused of sex crimes against minors, the first thing that usually happens is that they get reported to the organization which investigates their own rather than end up in prison, unless it's numerous complaints over a decade of "investigation"? Yet if an 18-year-old receives a sexy pic from his 17-year-old girlfriend with a phat ass, the SWAT team arrives to take him away?
One law for the PIZZA eaters at the Lolita Express, and Draconian laws for the average citizen. When you see these 8 to 15-year-old females dressing scantily at the swimming pool, while claiming that all boys in their class are rapists, they are likely PIZZA for Bill Clinton & Hitler y Clinton to munch on via Lolita Express.
Unfortunately, after being consumed like PIZZA thousands of times by Bill Clinton, when those same 8 to 15-year-old females later turn into adults & enter college, they end up making the campuses in DEFCOCK 1. Way to fucking go Bill Clinton you fucking Pizza eater/sarc.