I honestly can't see men my age (24-25) being able to raise a family in the U.K. With all fairness to them, it isn't necessarily because they are Beta male millennials, they all have something going for them. But firstly the cost of living is too high, even if you are earning something along the lines of £30k-40K a year; you will probably have to live at home for a couple of years with mum and dad. In order to save enough money to get on to the housing ladder. For those who don't do this, then the alternative is to flat share in a disgusting part of London while forking out over half of your salary on rent. Admittedly, quality of life is cheaper and probably more natural outside the big cities, but your salary will be substantially reduced.
Secondly, culture and family, girls and game. This has been done to death before on this forum. Due to gender dynamics and all the issues surrounding that, how many men can realistically settle down. The incentive kind of gets rubbed out when you see men on the 7/8 out of 10 in terms SMV scale of things; ending up with single mothers or ex party girls in their mid 30s. Both parties go along with it, but everyone knows that it kind of removes the whole point of having a family.
Culturally, even with Donald Trump in power, there will be constant attempts to undermine and invert all social norms. The difference between the generation who lived under Thatchers government in the 1980s and those who grew up during the Labour Years is evidential to this. Point being, raising a family on your terms will be incredibly difficult. Despite the popular consensus that teenagers are rebellious, the truth to the matter is that; teenagers are essentially sheep. It is only because popular culture demands that being rebellious against your parents is some sort of rite of passage. That so many young people stray from their families and eventually go down paths that they sometimes can't retrace back from.
I have repeated on this forum time and time again, how easy it would be to reverse all of these trends we are seeing. Just by looking at the East or Israel, in recent years, they have gain massive population boosts. And it should be added that these have all been in the construct of strong nuclear families. Simply by creating economic incentives and changing tax laws, essentially making it profitable to have many children, while being married.
Secondly, culture and family, girls and game. This has been done to death before on this forum. Due to gender dynamics and all the issues surrounding that, how many men can realistically settle down. The incentive kind of gets rubbed out when you see men on the 7/8 out of 10 in terms SMV scale of things; ending up with single mothers or ex party girls in their mid 30s. Both parties go along with it, but everyone knows that it kind of removes the whole point of having a family.
Culturally, even with Donald Trump in power, there will be constant attempts to undermine and invert all social norms. The difference between the generation who lived under Thatchers government in the 1980s and those who grew up during the Labour Years is evidential to this. Point being, raising a family on your terms will be incredibly difficult. Despite the popular consensus that teenagers are rebellious, the truth to the matter is that; teenagers are essentially sheep. It is only because popular culture demands that being rebellious against your parents is some sort of rite of passage. That so many young people stray from their families and eventually go down paths that they sometimes can't retrace back from.
I have repeated on this forum time and time again, how easy it would be to reverse all of these trends we are seeing. Just by looking at the East or Israel, in recent years, they have gain massive population boosts. And it should be added that these have all been in the construct of strong nuclear families. Simply by creating economic incentives and changing tax laws, essentially making it profitable to have many children, while being married.