[The Lizard of Oz]

(07-01-2016 08:36 AM)scorpion Wrote:  

To call this measure "relatively harmless" is, frankly, bullshit. You should know better. Go read Adonis' post for an active duty perspective.

If you read that post, you'll see that the real poison is not the actual presence of fags or trannies in the military but the endless Year Zero propaganda about it -- endless posters about "LGBT pride", "sensitivity training" by political commissars, lectures about "harassment", and so on. That is certainly poisonous to esprit de corps, as it is indeed to civilian life. But as great an evil as it is, it's a peacetime indulgence and will be gone in a heartbeat if we are seriously challenged. And it's -- of course -- much less pervasive to nonexistent in elite units that have to do real fighting.

As for actual fags and trannies: there are so few trannies -- and so few of them that would even think about enlisting in the military -- and so few of those who would be accepted -- that it literally makes no difference. Male-to-female trannies are intensely effeminate creatures and combat is usually not foremost on their minds. If anything, you'll get a few hard minded and hideous female-to-males, essentially dykes on steroids -- quite literally. They'll do their uninspired bit for the cause. And of course male gays have always been present in the military.

The thing that does a good deal more damage than any of this is simply women in the military -- especially the YZ attempt to drag women into combat roles for which they are not qualified and where they are a danger. Trannies are few but women are many, and in current American society they are godlike creatures whose every whim must be catered to. They're not making it into real elite units either, of course, but the fact that because of political orders a couple of them had to be babied through Ranger school is f'ing ridiculous. But this, too, is something that will fall away swiftly when we are seriously challenged -- though likely not until then.