[thoughtgypsy]

(04-08-2016 01:17 AM)Thoughtcrime Wrote:  

Let me cut to the chase - to my thesis. There is no decline. Not in the doomsday, fatalistic sense that I read about on /r/theredpill all the time. Society will not collapse just because women are slutting around so much and just because so many men are less ambitious now because society expects less of them. Technology will, at some point in the not too distant future (i.e. in our lifetimes), will result in so much labor being done for us, and not by us, that we will inevitably have to search for meaning in our lives, as individuals. Sluts gonna slut. Geniuses gonna go and keep making Linuxes, Teslas, space shuttles, smart phones and so on. Creatives and thinkers shall go on creating music, movies, writing books, etc. And those of us less talented or ambitious will have to figure out what we can do in our lives that's meaningful.. to us, as individuals. The church or the nuclear family will not be there to affirm our life choices or to shake their finger disapprovingly.

Who will pay for these easy clerical jobs? The government?

Who will fund the government?

Men pay the vast majority of taxes in the country. What incentive do they have to work harder beyond a basic subsistence level? In the past, it was to provide for the needs of their family, as it was guaranteed that the assets would be passed on to their posterity.

Now there is zero assurance that a man's production will be given to his family. Often the family is severed through no fault of his own, he is transformed into an indentured servant, and his forced child support payments will go to trivial purchases, not to the betterment of his posterity.

So men will avoid marriage and family formation, as can be seen by the falling marriage rate. Men without families are much less productive, and often produce just enough to meet their own basic and hedonistic needs. They will generate less taxes, making the massive government employee base and welfare state unsustainable.





Women are physically weaker, and evolved in an environment where they were suited towards domestic tasks. They often fall behind men in competitive environments, dangerous environments, and ones requiring spatial or analytical ability. They are often worse with finances, long term planning, and will often live for the now over the future. Historically, women have either relied on the surplus production of a man, or required a massive centralized government in order to sustain them.

Governments rely on the excess production of men in order to sustain themselves. Women and governments are net consumers, whereas only men are net producers. Where is the incentive of the producer to produce? There is none. Womens' entitlements and government expenditures will grow much faster until they can't, and will eventually collapse. We have exceeded the carrying capacity of the producers. The environment we know of today will be forced to transform.





To understand what the future brings, you must not assume that most things will remain a steady state. Everything in this world is a variable, and the unseen variables are often what decide our fate.