rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Swedish young liberals party wants legalisation of incest and necrofilia
#13

Swedish young liberals party wants legalisation of incest and necrofilia

Quote: (02-21-2016 12:58 PM)HenryHill Wrote:  

Pedophilia is different in that it pertains to individuals under the age of
consent. There is a clear and strong moral and practical argument for its criminalization.

That is not the case with incest or necrophilia.

I don't believe in criminalizing things because they are disgusting/unnatural. Even if it is damaging to the acting parties, as long as it does not affect me and they are consenting adults, it's none of my business.

The bolded part is, to me, the more important bit. Leave aside any questions of cowardice or Enjoying The Decline: how do you define "affecting me"?

Homosexuality is disgusting and unnatural. It's generally conducted between consenting adults. But its admission into mainstream society has caused arguably as much misery and damage to our culture, our military, and even our religions as feminism did. Indeed lesbianism -- homosexuality between women -- is a major driving force, if not the driving force behind most of the feminism that men are facing every single day. It is one of the major forces pushing the West into its present shitpile. As homosexual "families" become more common, more and more kids will be silenced into their "progressive" viewpoints, and the drift of society away from heterosexual norms will continue, in favour of something deeply degenerate. Even now some kids raised in homosexual families have publicly protested about their treatment.

Does it affect you? Probably not directly. But not everything in the world has to affect you directly to cause you some serious inconvenience or harm. Consider the Christian bakers, sued by a homosexual couple for refusing to serve that couple. Does it affect you directly? No. But precedent is all important in law, and precedent will come back to affect you later simply because judges love analogies and precedents, and they love warping what was a decision made for particular circumstances into general rules to cover the rest of us.

This is not a slippery slope argument. It's pure and simple bait and switch being offered by the Left. Every time some degenerate sexuality or degenerate practiced is put forward for acceptance in the name of "humanity" or "fairness" or "equality", the principal argument in favour is always "It's a private matter between consenting adults" or "It's none of your business." The second step is always to twist the Christian value of tolerance and demand that everyone "live and let live."

This is a bait-and-switch because nobody can see the unintended consequences of decriminalising degenerate behaviour, and those who are practicing that behaviour don't care what the consequences are.

Say necrophilia is decriminalised. You can leave it as a provision in your will that your body can be used to fuck Daniel Radcliffe complete with a fart bladder inserted into your anus. But when it is decriminalised, there will then be "debates" in society about "the intrinsic nature of life." On the Internet, there'll first be hilarious memes referencing Dr Manhattan's observation that "there is no difference between a living body and a dead body", but then taken more seriously "given necrophilia is decriminalised in Upper Bumfuck, Vermont." All those horrible diseases you can get from fucking a piece of rotting meat? Soon they'll be paid for on the public dime, because you can't dictate who or what I love.

And that's just with necrophilia which at least can be blocked on the basis of it being a public health problem to allow it rather than intrinsic moral grounds. It's worse in the case of incest.

Make no mistake: if incest becomes widely accepted, paedophilia will follow as night follows day. These last two taboos are not just moral issues, they, too, are public health initiatives simply because when you fuck children, you destroy them emotionally and mentally. You make them a public health problem. Again and again we see the backgrounds of paedophiles include a prior history of sexual abuse. Take a fucking look at most feminists' life histories, for Christ's sake: from Andrew Dworkin to Marilyn French most of them claim to have been molested as children, and it's so damaged them they take it out on the male sex for the rest of their fucking lives!

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)