Here are some statistics on interracial dating in the United States:

This data below was taken from OKCupid's dating site. OKCupid has 12 million users and is a mainstream dating site in America.

OKCupid Study



According to the data, Indian-American have the lowest response rate of all ethnicities. Even lower than Asian-American men.

Indian-American have a comparatively low response rate not just with women of Caucasian and minority ethnicities, but they receive a relatively low response rate form Indian-American women.

Much has been written about Asian-American men struggle in the dating market, but the data demonstrate that Indian-American men receive lower response rates from within their race and from other races.

Gendered racial exclusion among white internet daters ☆




This second study examined the dating preferences of White-American males and females. The study found that of all races, "East Indian" (a term that designates Indian and Pakistani) men were the most excluded by White-American women. Asian-American men faced a lower exclusion rate.

Black-American women were the most excluded female ethnicity by White-American men.

This seems to imply that (when examining the racial preferences of White-Americans) Indian/Pakistani men and black women have the lowest SMV in the United States. This study is consistent with the above data from OkCupid.

Re: Testosterone

The question of race and testosterone appeared in this topic. I thought it'd be interesting if I posted a ranking of all nations in (per capita) Olympic medal counts. This ranking could be an indicator of racial differences in testosterone, as more highly ranked nations likely produce people with more testosterone.

http://www.medalspercapita.com/#medals-p...a:all-time

Rank Country Medals Population Population per Medal

1 Finland 302 5,407,040 17,904
2 Sweden 483 9,490,683 19,649
3 Hungary 475 9,962,000 20,972
4 Denmark 179 5,580,516 31,176
5 Bahamas 11 353,658 32,150
6 Norway 149 5,005,700 33,595
7 Bulgaria 214 7,364,570 34,413
8 East Germany 409 16,111,000 39,391
9 Estonia 33 1,318,005 39,939
10 Jamaica 67 2,705,827 40,385
11 Switzerland 184 7,870,100 42,772
12 New Zealand 99 4,432,620 44,773
13 Australia 467 22,880,619 48,994
14 Cuba 208 11,241,161 54,044
15 Netherlands 266 16,731,770 62,901
16 Romania 301 19,042,936 63,265
17 Bermuda 1 64,237 64,237
18 Czechoslovakia 143 10,318,000 72,153
19 Trinidad and Tobago 18 1,317,714 73,206
20 Belgium 142 10,951,266 77,121
21 Great Britain 781 62,262,000 79,720
22 Iceland 4 319,575 79,893
23 France 670 65,350,000 97,537
24 Greece 110 10,787,690 98,069
25 Austria 86 8,452,835 98,288
26 Tonga 1 103,036 103,036
27 Virgin Islands 1 106,405 106,405
28 Slovenia 19 2,057,540 108,291
29 Latvia 19 2,070,371 108,966
30 Italy 550 60,776,531 110,502
31 Grenada 1 110,821 110,821
32 Netherlands Antilles 2 227,049 113,524
33 Mongolia 24 2,736,800 114,033
34 Yugoslavia 90 10,348,473 114,983
35 Belarus 78 9,461,400 121,300
36 Canada 278 34,771,400 125,076
37 United States 2,401 313,382,000 130,521
38 Poland 271 38,501,000 142,070
39 Germany 573 81,831,000 142,811
40 Lithuania 21 3,192,800 152,038
41 Ireland 28 4,588,252 163,866
42 Georgia 25 4,469,200 178,768
43 Croatia 23 4,290,612 186,548
44 South Korea 243 48,580,000 199,917
45 Slovakia 24 5,445,324 226,888
46 Czech Republic 43 10,504,203 244,283
47 Luxembourg 2 511,800 255,900
48 Suriname 2 529,000 264,500
49 Soviet Union 1,010 272,000,000 269,306
50 Armenia 12 3,268,500 272,375
51 Barbados 1 274,200 274,200
52 Japan 398 127,650,000 320,728
53 Kazakhstan 52 16,718,000 321,500
54 Uruguay 10 3,251,526 325,152
55 Azerbaijan 26 9,111,100 350,426
56 Russian Fed. 406 143,056,383 352,355
57 Spain 130 46,196,278 355,355
58 West Germany 204 72,562,666 355,699
59 Australasia 12 4,651,848 387,654
60 Ukraine 116 45,644,419 393,486
61 Qatar 4 1,699,435 424,858
62 Kenya 86 38,610,097 448,954
63 Portugal 23 10,561,614 459,200
64 Puerto Rico 8 3,725,789 465,723
65 Moldova 7 3,559,500 508,500
66 North Korea 47 24,052,231 511,749
67 Argentina 70 40,117,096 573,101
68 Namibia 4 2,324,000 581,000
69 Bahrain 2 1,234,571 617,285
70 Montenegro 1 620,029 620,029
71 South Africa 76 50,586,757 665,615
72 Germany 118 81,831,000 693,483
73 Guyana 1 784,894 784,894
74 Djibouti 1 818,159 818,159
75 Cyprus 1 838,897 838,897
76 Turkey 87 74,724,269 858,899
77 Serbia 7 7,120,666 1,017,238
78 Lebanon 4 4,259,000 1,064,750
79 Tunisia 10 10,673,800 1,067,380
80 Costa Rica 4 4,301,712 1,075,428
81 Israel 7 7,859,300 1,122,757
82 Panama 3 3,405,813 1,135,271
83 Taiwan 19 23,234,003 1,222,842
84 Iran 60 76,309,000 1,271,816
85 Mauritius 1 1,286,051 1,286,051
86 Singapore 4 5,183,700 1,295,925
87 Chile 13 17,402,630 1,338,663
88 Uzbekistan 21 29,123,400 1,386,828
89 Morocco 22 32,526,800 1,478,490
90 Gabon 1 1,534,000 1,534,000
91 Dominican Republic 6 9,378,818 1,563,136
92 Zimbabwe 8 12,754,000 1,594,250
93 Brazil 108 192,376,496 1,781,263
94 Kuwait 2 3,582,054 1,791,027
95 Mexico 62 112,336,538 1,811,879
96 Kyrgyzstan 3 5,477,600 1,825,866
97 Ethiopia 45 84,320,987 1,873,799
98 Botswana 1 2,038,228 2,038,228
99 Macedonia 1 2,057,284 2,057,284
100 Venezuela 12 27,150,095 2,262,507
101 Hong Kong 3 7,103,700 2,367,900
102 Colombia 19 46,475,000 2,446,052
103 Algeria 15 37,100,000 2,473,333
104 Tajikistan 3 7,616,000 2,538,666
105 Thailand 24 65,479,453 2,728,310
106 China 473 1,347,350,000 2,848,520
107 Egypt 26 81,927,000 3,151,038
108 Cameroon 5 19,406,100 3,881,220
109 Uganda 7 32,939,800 4,705,685
110 Malaysia 6 28,334,135 4,722,355
111 Haiti 2 10,085,214 5,042,607
112 Eritrea 1 5,415,000 5,415,000
113 Serbia and Montenegro 2 10,832,545 5,416,272
114 Ghana 4 24,223,431 6,055,857
115 Togo 1 6,191,155 6,191,155
116 Paraguay 1 6,337,127 6,337,127
117 Zambia 2 13,046,508 6,523,254
118 Nigeria 23 162,471,000 7,063,956
119 Syria 3 21,532,000 7,177,333
120 Ecuador 2 14,483,499 7,241,749
121 Peru 4 30,135,875 7,533,968
122 Burundi 1 8,038,618 8,038,618
123 United Arab Emirates 1 8,264,070 8,264,070
124 Indonesia 27 237,641,326 8,801,530
125 Saudi Arabia 3 27,136,977 9,045,659
126 Philippines 9 92,337,852 10,259,761
127 Mozambique 2 23,700,715 11,850,357
128 Afghanistan 2 24,485,600 12,242,800
129 Senegal 1 12,855,153 12,855,153
130 Guatemala 1 14,713,763 14,713,763
131 Niger 1 16,274,738 16,274,738
132 Pakistan 10 179,309,000 17,930,900
133 Sri Lanka 1 20,653,000 20,653,000
134 Côte d'Ivoire 1 21,395,000 21,395,000
135 Tanzania 2 43,188,000 21,594,000
136 Sudan 1 30,894,000 30,894,000
137 Iraq 1 33,330,000 33,330,000
138 Vietnam 2 87,840,000 43,920,000
139 India 26 1,241,491,960 47,749,690


Of all nations on this list, India has the lowest numbers of Olympic medal on a per capita basis. Pakistan and Sri Lanka perform almost as badly and are at the bottom of this list. Bangladesh performs so poorly that it didn't even make the list. So it appears that the South Asian nations perform uniformly poorly.

East Asian nations (China, Japan, Korea) don't perform particularly well, but their overall performance is comparatively far better than the South Asian nations.

Re: Canada

I was curious to see if the interracial dating preferences would be any different in Canada. I fortunately found some interesting data.

http://www.straight.com/life/our-sex-sur...-depp-rule

This data come from an anonymous survey with 25,000 respondents in the Vancouver metropolitan area (in the British Columbia province of western Canada). The survey asked the respondents to select their preference if they were in an interracial marriage. Respondents were asked to select their most preferred ethnicity. Respondents were not allowed to select their own ethnicity. Since the overwhelming majority of the respondents were Caucasian, they couldn't select Caucasian men or Caucasian women.

Here's the data on the interracial marriage preferences:

Quote:Quote:

If you were to marry outside your race, what’s your choice?


( female responses)
Does not matter: 51.4 percent

Latin American: 14.3 percent

Caucasian: 10.6 percent

African origin: 9.1 percent

Mediterranean: 8.9 percent

South Asian: 2.4 percent

Aboriginal: 2.1 percent

East Asian: 1.2 percent


( male responses)


Does not matter: 42.4 percent

Latin American: 15.7 percent

East Asian: 11.9 percent

Mediterranean: 10.4 percent

Caucasian: 7.6 percent

South Asian: 7.3 percent

African origin: 3.8 percent

Aboriginal: 1 percent

Among the Vancouver Canadian women, the least preferred ethnicities were South Asian men, Aboriginal men, and East Asian men.

Among the men, the least preferred ethnicities were Aboriginal women and African women.


Remember that the vast majority of respondents were Caucasian, so they couldn't select their own race.

In the Vancouver area, the large majority of East Asian men are from Hong Kong and mainland China. The majority of Vancouver-area South Asian men are from the Panjab region of northwestern India and followers of the Sikissm religion. See this source for more details: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Vancouver

^^^ If that study is true, then I should get my ass up to Canada asap.

Quote: (11-22-2014 09:25 PM)MidWest Wrote:  

^^^ If that study is true, then I should get my ass up to Canada asap.

That study is based on a magazine survey conducted. I included the link above, so you can verify that this data is from a real survey.

Remember that this data is based on interracial preferences, so the overwhelmingly Caucasian respondents couldn't select their own race. This survey is a good indicator of what (primarily Caucasians in the Vancouver metro of Canada) people would date if they couldn't date their own ethnicity.

I previously had data from a dating survey conducted in the Toronto metropolitan area (in eastern Canada). I can't find that data anymore, but the results were fairly similar. South Asian men(Indians/Pakistanis) and East Asian men performed the worst.

In that Toronto study, fake profiles (of various races) were created on a dating site and responses were sent to large numbers of females. South Asian men(Indians/Pakistanis) and East Asian men performed the worst. Interestingly, in that study, a South Asian male model was used in the dating profile and that male model had non-South Asian features.

Here's his picture:

Despite looking non-South Asian, specifying his race as "South Asian" had a very negative impact on his response rate. Only the East Asian dating profile performed worse. If a more generic-looking South Asian profile had been used, perhaps the response rate would've been even lower than the East Asian profile.

Quote: (11-19-2014 07:31 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (11-19-2014 06:59 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

Quote: (11-19-2014 04:40 PM)MidWest Wrote:  

^^^^Good advice from an Indian American that many should take a look at. Jesse probably bangs white blonde girls left and right and yes he's brown.

He's full of shit. Anyone claiming that "looks don't matter" is selling snake oil. All this guy needs to do is set up a Tinder or OKC account of a good looking and an average guy then compare the results. Then tell me that looks don't matter crap. I can't stand the Simple Pickup guys.

That shit is ridiculous, this guy isn't good.

This world is ABSOLUTELY superficial first, the first thing a girl looks at it is your looks and how you dress, body language, and that's before you even open your mouth or smile or have eye contact.

This guy has a fascination about ass wiping.

It doesn't just come down just to "feeling good about yourself" there are a lot of factors, looks being one of them.

He's giving some bad advice.

He does contradict himself in the video when he says "looks don't mean shit", and then says "there's girls who have picked a hot muscled guy over me"


So if looks do matter, then that means your race matters just as much as well. There are guys out there who say race doesn't matter only your game.

Self-reported data is useless, look at what people do not what they say. If you want to get a clear picture of mixing you have to look at intermarriage data and the best place to do that is the Census. You need academic access to get it for free, but check out "Intermarriage by Birthplace and Ancestry in Australia" by Siew-Ean Khoo, Bob Birrell, Genevieve Heard in People and Place, vol. 17, no. 1, 2009.

Looking at the largest immigrant groups (who can easily find co-ethnics to marry where they live), according to the 2006 Census 35% of second generation and 69% of third generation Chinese men, 40% of all second generation Arab men, 51% of second generation and 77% of third generation Italian men and 56% of second generation Indian men were intermarried in 2006. Where the third generation wasn't stated it was because there wasn't enough third generation respondents of marriage age at the time to make a sufficient dataset.

Among women intermarriage rates were the same or lower than men's for all groups except "Oriental" Asians, i.e second generation Chinese women had a 48% intermarriage rate vs 35% for men, although the gap is almost gone by the 3rd generation (69% of men vs 73% of women for the Chinese). Unfortunately the only data on Africans is for South Africans (almost all of whom are white), and 1st generation Sudanese, who at 11% had a lower intermarriage rate than first generation Indian, Arab and Italian men, but a higher intermarriage rate than Chinese and Vietnamese men. Latino's are virtually non-existent here even today.

TL;DR: in Australia second generation Indian men are more likely to marry out than second generation Italian, Arab and Chinese men, AND Chinese women.

Exclude Indians and Orientials marrying people from another "Asian" ancestry and the true intermarriage rate in the 2nd generation drops to about 27% for both Chinese and Vietnamese men (Vietnamese dudes seem marry a lot of non-Vietnamese Asian women) and 52% for Indian men down from 56%. Do the same for Italian men marrying "Asian" women and it's still lower than Indians at 49% down from 51%. Also FYI a lot of other European groups in the table are present in too small numbers to accurately compare to larger groups, there's not enough for someone to easily find a co-ethnic to marry.

Quote: (11-21-2014 05:44 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

I’ve banged a few east-Asian women who have straight up said to me they don’t like Indian men, but because I’m from UK and I come across as British, they’re fine with me.

When they say that they mean they are not into the poor laborers who are building the Arab world literally with their own blood, they mean they are not into auto rickshaw drivers who are migrating from villages and signing of their lives so that their kids can have better ones. She means she isn't into people who have no time to breathe and worry about things like fashion because they're making ends meet and wondering where foods coming from.

It is what it is but you coming across as 'British' has nothing to do with it.

Quote: (11-22-2014 06:42 PM)Hector_St_Clare Wrote:  

. (Parsees are an extremely endogamous community, so I doubt they mixed much with native Indians).

Not anymore they aren't. As people migrate towards the cities only one thing speaks now. Money, (the wonders of capitalism I suppose, we should thank our American brothers for that). No one really cares anymore, everyone's mixing with everyone. My current squeeze is Parsi, my former Coorgi and I am from the deep south.


As for fighting He posted everything in caps and underlined things too therefore it must be true ignoring the fact that he demonstrates a piss poor grasp of how to interpret data sets and does not understand that inferences without understanding the limitations of the survey are worthless


Even more amusing is his childish clumsy attempt at linking testosterone with olympic medals ignoring various other far more important things like infrastructure and lack of interest. No one in the sub continent gives a damn about anything apart from Cricket and they are quite frankly dominant at it.
Football is gaining popularity and there are a number of players coming through from youth academies of clubs throughout the world now.

@zidhai89, it's not my place but rather the moderators'. While I understand the point, you're fairly new here and the message you send could have sounded a lot less abrasive. I'd like to see you stay but I suggest you tone it down a bit or you're risking a ban from likely the best place on the internet for men.

My own take:

If I go to Orange County or some other predominantly white community and approach about 20 girls, I'd be less able to hook them into a number, date or otherwise. This is due to my overall lack of experience with them (relative to other types of girls) and my inner frame/game thereby giving a whole bunch of excuses to not go 100% on the approach.

If I go to Harlem and approach 20 black girls, response would be much different and I'd be closer to the 100% in gaming them, while anxiety levels are also much lower because I believe I will have success based on past experiences. As a result, success rate will be much higher.

East New York (Latinas) almost same as above.

Union Square, mixed bag due to mixed perceptions of my own.

My point is, you can get bangs from girls in your comfort zone, but wouldn't the key to self-improvement be to push yourself out of the comfort zone and step out of Harlem and hit Orange County or somewhere in Arizona where the hotter white girls are (you know you want to)? Key is the "want." Lot of guys don't want to and that's fine but then don't expect that those girls will bring their pussy over to you in your predominantly "insert race" community.

You don't go outside of the comfort zone. So why would you expect the statistics to be different. Jump out and approach girls you normally wouldn't approach especially if you think they're hot. No one but you (specifically sociological setup and programming) is stopping you from changing these statistics. Blaming it on these girls and their shallowness is a cop out when you don't approach. A guy that approaches and has success likely won't point out something so irrelevant.

I approached a model quality (9) in NYC by Union Square a few weekends ago. She looked up at a building, waved to a guy. I said oh shit, time to eject in my subconscious but then again I consciously told it to go fuck itself. And approached anyway, and went direct. Few seconds into my approach the guy came to the door at the building and she left. Now that I write this, I realize if it wasn't for my positive attitude, I wouldn't have gone for it.

Another girl, a blonde valley looking 7.5, I approached in a mall. She was actually Russian (even better) and had a boyfriend. I blew past it and got her number anyway. I was dressed to the T, pocket square included. More details in the game analysis thread.

So I'm hoping you see the more sociological and cultural phenomenon at play that back up these statistics rather than the immediate race/prejudice card being thrown out there. It's easy to associate the statistics with the race bullshit. No matter what, I end up finding a white girl or two that have always found me attractive no matter what these "race" issues may be. And the approaches it takes me to find that one are getting lower and lower.

Play on players.

Quote: (11-23-2014 07:58 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

I'd like to see you stay but I suggest you tone it down a bit or you're risking a ban from likely the best place on the internet for men.

Ha ha, thanks. It was meant to be slightly abrasive because quite frankly it is irritating to read large blocks of copy paste where the poster seems to be using a cookie cutter approach because he has exhausted all avenues of rational thinking and it bizarrely bordered on race-baiting.

I could of course have given an easy rebuttal which for one would start with socio-economic factors and the fact that Indian women very rarely if ever date/marry/fk outside their own amongst many others but I suspect subtlety would've been lost on him.

You are right that this place is good for the most part so i'll let it go. Cheers.

Quote: (11-23-2014 07:58 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

My own take:

If I go to Orange County or some other predominantly white community and approach about 20 girls, I'd be less able to hook them into a number, date or otherwise. This is due to my overall lack of experience with them (relative to other types of girls) and my inner frame/game thereby giving a whole bunch of excuses to not go 100% on the approach.

THIS is my specialty actually, white girls and latin girls out here.

After all Southern California is my playground.

I'm confused about what direction this thread has taken from all the studies and east asian people thing..

I wish some Indian guys would stop blaming it on there brown skin because I've seen so many brown latin players do well in the US! That is only an excuse

Quote: (11-24-2014 10:30 AM)bojangles Wrote:  

I'm confused about what direction this thread has taken from all the studies and east asian people thing..

Yes it's like people are using statistics to explain some kind of racial aberration that doesn't exist. Additionally the subtext of it all seems to imply that it can't be overcome given the deck APPEARS to be so stacked against you. If I did what most of these Indian guys did, no way would I be where I am now. Ignoring stuff like this is actually the key to unlocking inner game.

It's actually just showing me how easy it is to stand out.

After meeting up a couple times I can attest to your truth Cobra

Contrast is key to you pulling different stripes of women, I've witnessed it with my own eyes

Nice to read of your exploits back East; sounds like it's your time player!!!

Fighting888

Are you indian? If so, you are proving what is really messed up with indians.

Okcupid study? fine. it's a dating website.

What the fuck is up with Olympic medal things? How about coming up with Algorithm of getting laid?

Quote: (11-24-2014 02:37 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

Yes it's like people are using statistics to explain some kind of racial aberration that doesn't exist.

I like you Cobra but let's call a spade a spade. It isn't some people, it's one guy fighting888 who seems to have polluted this thread with utter garbage and not so subtle race baiting.

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:10 PM)zidhai89 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 02:37 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

Yes it's like people are using statistics to explain some kind of racial aberration that doesn't exist.

I like you Cobra but let's call a spade a spade. It isn't some people, it's one guy fighting888 who seems to have polluted this thread with utter garbage and not so subtle race baiting.

Somewhat true, but this thread IS called "Inside the Prejudices of an Indian Man"

Quote: (11-23-2014 07:58 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

@zidhai89, it's not my place but rather the moderators'. While I understand the point, you're fairly new here and the message you send could have sounded a lot less abrasive. I'd like to see you stay but I suggest you tone it down a bit or you're risking a ban from likely the best place on the internet for men.

My own take:

If I go to Orange County or some other predominantly white community and approach about 20 girls, I'd be less able to hook them into a number, date or otherwise. This is due to my overall lack of experience with them (relative to other types of girls) and my inner frame/game thereby giving a whole bunch of excuses to not go 100% on the approach.

If I go to Harlem and approach 20 black girls, response would be much different and I'd be closer to the 100% in gaming them, while anxiety levels are also much lower because I believe I will have success based on past experiences. As a result, success rate will be much higher.

East New York (Latinas) almost same as above.

Union Square, mixed bag due to mixed perceptions of my own.

My point is, you can get bangs from girls in your comfort zone, but wouldn't the key to self-improvement be to push yourself out of the comfort zone and step out of Harlem and hit Orange County or somewhere in Arizona where the hotter white girls are (you know you want to)? Key is the "want." Lot of guys don't want to and that's fine but then don't expect that those girls will bring their pussy over to you in your predominantly "insert race" community.

You don't go outside of the comfort zone. So why would you expect the statistics to be different. Jump out and approach girls you normally wouldn't approach especially if you think they're hot. No one but you (specifically sociological setup and programming) is stopping you from changing these statistics. Blaming it on these girls and their shallowness is a cop out when you don't approach. A guy that approaches and has success likely won't point out something so irrelevant.

I approached a model quality (9) in NYC by Union Square a few weekends ago. She looked up at a building, waved to a guy. I said oh shit, time to eject in my subconscious but then again I consciously told it to go fuck itself. And approached anyway, and went direct. Few seconds into my approach the guy came to the door at the building and she left. Now that I write this, I realize if it wasn't for my positive attitude, I wouldn't have gone for it.

Another girl, a blonde valley looking 7.5, I approached in a mall. She was actually Russian (even better) and had a boyfriend. I blew past it and got her number anyway. I was dressed to the T, pocket square included. More details in the game analysis thread.

So I'm hoping you see the more sociological and cultural phenomenon at play that back up these statistics rather than the immediate race/prejudice card being thrown out there. It's easy to associate the statistics with the race bullshit. No matter what, I end up finding a white girl or two that have always found me attractive no matter what these "race" issues may be. And the approaches it takes me to find that one are getting lower and lower.

Play on players.

I know you posted this yesterday but



Lots of helpful insight. I do the exact same thing. Its gotten to the point where I don't even care if she's a 9 a 7 or whatever. Just fucking approach, what is there to lose? Some guys here are putting white blonde girls hard on the pedestal.

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:12 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:10 PM)zidhai89 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 02:37 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

Yes it's like people are using statistics to explain some kind of racial aberration that doesn't exist.

I like you Cobra but let's call a spade a spade. It isn't some people, it's one guy fighting888 who seems to have polluted this thread with utter garbage and not so subtle race baiting.

Somewhat true, but this thread IS called "Inside the Prejudices of an Indian Man"

Lol, i'd place a hefty bet he's Pakistani.

Quote: (11-23-2014 04:48 AM)zidhai89 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-21-2014 05:44 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

I’ve banged a few east-Asian women who have straight up said to me they don’t like Indian men, but because I’m from UK and I come across as British, they’re fine with me.

When they say that they mean they are not into the poor laborers who are building the Arab world literally with their own blood, they mean they are not into auto rickshaw drivers who are migrating from villages and signing of their lives so that their kids can have better ones. She means she isn't into people who have no time to breathe and worry about things like fashion because they're making ends meet and wondering where foods coming from.

It is what it is but you coming across as 'British' has nothing to do with it.

Totally disagree. The Indian men they’re referring too are the thirsty FOB Indian IT/Engineering types in the US. I doubt these women even know or give a shit about the Indian labourers in the Arab world or rickshaw drivers.

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:27 PM)zidhai89 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:12 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 04:10 PM)zidhai89 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-24-2014 02:37 PM)Cobra Wrote:  

Yes it's like people are using statistics to explain some kind of racial aberration that doesn't exist.

I like you Cobra but let's call a spade a spade. It isn't some people, it's one guy fighting888 who seems to have polluted this thread with utter garbage and not so subtle race baiting.

Somewhat true, but this thread IS called "Inside the Prejudices of an Indian Man"

Lol, i'd place a hefty bet he's Pakistani.

Eh doubt it, because I'm Pakistani by birth, but not at all by culture.

Pakistani, Indian same thing, if my grandparents hadn't moved before the two nations split up i might have called myself Pakistani today.

On another note have you guys had any luck at indian/Pakistani weddings?

Quote: (11-24-2014 05:20 PM)KC4 Wrote:  

Pakistani, Indian same thing, if my grandparents hadn't moved before the two nations split up i might have called myself Pakistani today.

On another note have you guys had any luck at indian/Pakistani weddings?

Hahah EXACTLY my gramps was "indian" my gramma was "pakistani" before the split.

I've only been to muslim weddings unfortunately, of course it was DRY so I had to pre-game hard and sneak a flask in.

From what I remember there wasn't much talent, lot of princess syndrome, or born again muslim girls.

I'd love to check out an indian wedding, get in touch with my heritage, I've had some luck with paki/indian girls but there aren't much around here where I'm at.

Quote: (11-24-2014 05:20 PM)KC4 Wrote:  

Pakistani, Indian same thing, if my grandparents hadn't moved before the two nations split up i might have called myself Pakistani today.

There’s not much difference between most Pakistanis and Indian Punjabis. When I tell some south Indians that I relate more to Pakistanis than to them, they get super pissed off about it.

I’ve also heard south Indian men pedestalise Pakistani women – they think they’re better looking than Indian women. There’s no difference looks wise between say a Hindu/Sikh Punjabi vs a Pakistani Punjabi woman – they’re the same race! I guess if you compare a Pakistani woman with a south Indian woman, then I can understand where they’re coming from.

Quote: (11-24-2014 05:20 PM)KC4 Wrote:  

On another note have you guys had any luck at indian/Pakistani weddings?

I’m Punjabi and never tried it – it could be too risky. Punjabis are pretty old school and don’t expect men to try to chat up women at weddings.

I’ve been told by Gujuratis before that at Gujurati weddings, they’re supposed to try to meet members of the opposite sex (for marriage purposes only, not for the bang).

Quote: (11-24-2014 05:32 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

I've only been to muslim weddings unfortunately, of course it was DRY so I had to pre-game hard and sneak a flask in.

From what I remember there wasn't much talent, lot of princess syndrome, or born again muslim girls.

I'd love to check out an indian wedding, get in touch with my heritage, I've had some luck with paki/indian girls but there aren't much around here where I'm at.

Hindu and Sikh Punjabi weddings have alcohol flowing with a free bar, plus a DJ and lots of dancing. The downside of this is that sometimes you get some drunken morons getting into fights with each other.