The girl on the right looks like a man!
_________________________________
"To the man who only has a hammer, everything he encounters begins to look like a nail."
—Abraham Maslow
Quote: (05-24-2011 11:39 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 11:30 PM)SFTD Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:30 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:20 PM)Vesuvius Wrote:
I guess I'm not a PUA. I'm a whore. I'd bang most of there girls, except that fat hootchie with the smoke. My dick has standards!
Yeah I would probably bang most of these girls when push came to shove, as long as I had to put in zero effort and there were no strings attached (being drunk would help too). I might be able to say no to some of the fatties since that's much more of a deal-breaker for me than a butterface. It's one thing to look at a girl and say you wouldn't hit it on an internet forum and quite another to imagine her naked in a bed telling you to come fuck her. In that situation do I walk away from most of these girls? I can't say I would.
By the way, here's what I consider a 5-6 (left). Yeah I hit it, but she made it really goddamn easy otherwise I wouldn't have put in the work.
How was her body? The clothes say there is something being hidden. If there is, 5, if not, I'd say 6.5.
Her body is fine, no issues there. For some reason her face looks better in that picture than it does in person though, trust me she's a 6 tops.
Here's a better picture. That's her boyfriend on the left
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:30 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
It's one thing to look at a girl and say you wouldn't hit it on an internet forum and quite another to imagine her naked in a bed telling you to come fuck her. In that situation do I walk away from most of these girls? I can't say I would.
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:30 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
By the way, here's what I consider a 5-6 (left). Yeah I hit it, but she made it really goddamn easy otherwise I wouldn't have put in the work.
Quote: (05-25-2011 01:50 AM)Bronze Wrote:
I would give this girl a 5 in the picture above, and a 4 in this picture. This good-looking guy is her boyfriend? I always feel pity for guys like him - good looks, probably no game, unattractive girlfriend.
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:30 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
By the way, here's what I consider a 5-6 (left). Yeah I hit it, but she made it really goddamn easy otherwise I wouldn't have put in the work.
Quote: (05-23-2011 06:48 PM)speakeasy Wrote:
Quote: (05-23-2011 06:37 PM)Mrs. Chocolate Wrote:
She is not that ugly, again, wrong haircut and a few extra pounds.
I'll go out on a limb and agree with Chocolatinha here. Not that I'd be hollering at her, but there's nothing tragically wrong with her face. It's just that her hair makes her look bad. If she grew long hair, trimmed the weight down a bit and had some idea how to look feminine, she could at least be brought up to average.
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:30 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 08:20 PM)Vesuvius Wrote:
I guess I'm not a PUA. I'm a whore. I'd bang most of there girls, except that fat hootchie with the smoke. My dick has standards!
Yeah I would probably bang most of these girls when push came to shove, as long as I had to put in zero effort and there were no strings attached (being drunk would help too). I might be able to say no to some of the fatties since that's much more of a deal-breaker for me than a butterface. It's one thing to look at a girl and say you wouldn't hit it on an internet forum and quite another to imagine her naked in a bed telling you to come fuck her. In that situation do I walk away from most of these girls? I can't say I would.
By the way, here's what I consider a 5-6 (left). Yeah I hit it, but she made it really goddamn easy otherwise I wouldn't have put in the work.
Quote: (05-25-2011 01:48 PM)Luckystar Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 06:43 PM)truedat Wrote:
If this girl had a coach bag and a better hairstyle would she be a 5-6 or even a 7? Chocolate what do ya think?
Bro, this chick is a fatty. She's a 4. I would not hit this farm animal.
Quote: (05-25-2011 02:43 PM)Moma Wrote:
Quote: (05-25-2011 01:48 PM)Luckystar Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 06:43 PM)truedat Wrote:
If this girl had a coach bag and a better hairstyle would she be a 5-6 or even a 7? Chocolate what do ya think?
Bro, this chick is a fatty. She's a 4. I would not hit this farm animal.
I'd fcuk her. The face is decent plus she has 'somewhat' of a coca cola bottle shape body..
Quote: (05-25-2011 06:58 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:
I was thinking about all this and I think the difference between "rating" and "bangability" needs to be defined.
Rating is not only personal, IE one mans 9 is another mans 6, but its also somewhat pointless. We've all banged girls we didnt necessarily find that attractive.
Rating is 1 - 10
Bangability is 1 - 2 , 1 for yes, 2 for no.
Just because someone rates a girl a 6, and you think she's an 8, doesn't mean that same guy wouldn't rate her a 1 on the bangability scale.
Quote: (05-25-2011 06:58 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:
Bangability is 1 - 2 , 1 for yes, 2 for no.
Quote: (05-25-2011 09:42 PM)Luckystar Wrote:
Bangability is built into a rating, so it's easy for me conceptually. A 5 means you would hit it, if you are hard up. Above 5 is discretionary and means you would hit it with a progressively clearer mind.
Quote: (05-26-2011 03:15 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:
Quote: (05-25-2011 06:58 PM)Chad Daring Wrote:
Bangability is 1 - 2 , 1 for yes, 2 for no.
Quote: (05-25-2011 09:42 PM)Luckystar Wrote:
Bangability is built into a rating, so it's easy for me conceptually. A 5 means you would hit it, if you are hard up. Above 5 is discretionary and means you would hit it with a progressively clearer mind.
Yes, plus bangability is a matter of circumstance and context. A binary system simply doesn't account for nuanced situations like a brutal dry spell, closing time at the bar, or a hate-fuck opportunity. Not only that, when you oversimplify bangability to a yes/no question, you eliminate all colors of intensity. You would bang a 5, but not work nearly as hard as you would for a 7.
To put a dime piece and a 5 in the same camp--"fuckable"--is simply obscene to me. That's like calling a car "drivable."
There's a massive spectrum between the two bookends.
Quote: (05-25-2011 06:32 PM)Bronze Wrote:
Quote: (05-25-2011 02:43 PM)Moma Wrote:
Quote: (05-25-2011 01:48 PM)Luckystar Wrote:
Quote: (05-24-2011 06:43 PM)truedat Wrote:
If this girl had a coach bag and a better hairstyle would she be a 5-6 or even a 7? Chocolate what do ya think?
Bro, this chick is a fatty. She's a 4. I would not hit this farm animal.
I'd fcuk her. The face is decent plus she has 'somewhat' of a coca cola bottle shape body..
This is not a 5. She's a -5.
Quote: (05-17-2011 01:24 AM)bars Wrote:
So, how do you classify this pair?
http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-a...1393_n.jpg
Quote: (05-17-2011 06:52 PM)Amour Fou Wrote:
What about these:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_6g5yk...G_1206.JPG
Quote: (05-24-2011 06:43 PM)truedat Wrote:
If this girl had a coach bag and a better hairstyle would she be a 5-6 or even a 7? Chocolate what do ya think?
Quote: (05-18-2011 12:09 PM)kerouac Wrote:
Here are some girls of OKCupid I think I could bang:
no question
These are just a few that showed up first, but I think these would be in the bang-without-too-much-alcohol level (depending, of course, on the personality)
Quote: (05-28-2011 09:14 PM)Urban Renaissance Man Wrote:
Quote: (05-18-2011 12:09 PM)kerouac Wrote:That first one is approaching 8, in my opinion! The second one is an easy 7.
Here are some girls of OKCupid I think I could bang:
Quote: (06-01-2011 02:30 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:
Let's push the envelope a little bit. Are some of these good enough to be 6s?
Quote: (06-01-2011 02:30 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:
Let's push the envelope a little bit. Are some of these good enough to be 6s?