Quote: (04-21-2019 06:49 PM)TutorGuina Wrote:
Would it be a problem for you to expose these messages? Must be an interesting read, like snooping into a lunatic's diary. Your explanations may be into something
I don't have any contact with the guy. But it was in 2015, so must have been close to the time Belle Knox wobbled her way back into the woodwork - she exited the industry, deleted her accounts and kept her head low.
I just watched her early 2014 interview with Piers Morgan and in it she complained about how the patriarchy and 1000s of years of religion had repressed her and society - so people should just be free, get naked and have their sex acts uploaded to the internet. i.e. she was infused by the anti-traditional narrative I mentioned.
However, after being ridiculed about being a feminist before then choked, slapped and spat on the road to the empowering facial pop, she became a bit elusive and then disappeared.
This guy was talking to her shortly before she disappeared. I don't remember specific content, but it was all very ditsy Marylin Monroe type fainting tricks mixed with the same libertarian "just go free" rhetoric. I interpreted it as her trying to fall on this guy, who though a bit soy was fairly wealthy. It was the beta bux part of the recipe.
As this
NY Post article reveals she later essentially sided with the views of the patriarchy and religion and completely repressed herself from the public sphere.
She obviously had some considerable trauma as she revealed in an interview that she scrawled PIG in her thigh with a broken mirror; and, if I remember correctly, tried to perform liposuction on herself. What kind of 18 year old goes into porn and then blabs such things to the media? It's like lying on the floor with your legs in the air - an advert for predators.
I think that this in some way relates to the inherent desire of women for their prince. A desire which is being masked in The West with disastrous effect. There is an archetype that has been with us for at least a few thousand years -
the damsel in distress - a woman who is laid bare to danger and saved by a valiant man. Note the article says the damsel in distress archetype is seen as sexist.
There is a lot of evidence that while women find male strength irresistible, men find female vulnerability and delicacy irresistible. The latter is your chaste virgin, in national dress, walking through the fields in the morning. Not cake-face, pornographic whores.
That hyper-feminist, libertarian Belle Knox made herself a damsel in distress (the archetype of female vulnerability) shows just how skewed out of reality these people are. In her desire to ignore her fragility, the manifestation of her vulnerability became delete-yourself-from-the-web toxic. It's not in her conscious mind, as EndsExpects touches on. And when something is not in you conscious mind you tend to manifest the opposite of what is in the unconscious as a defence against ever knowing who you are. For example from unconscious insecurity comes arrogance.
An empowered woman wouldn't need to tell you she's empowered. Always be suspect if someone positively characterises themselves. An empowered woman, especially in the face of the left/mainstream, is one who admits her limitations.
So with the feminists and the sexually liberated who have a leaning towards turning themselves into whores I'd say they suppress as much of their vulnerability as they can. That suppression leaves in their conscious an extreme openness to prove to themselves they are not vulnerable; and the idea that they can go up against the likes of the psychos at FacialAbuse.
This suppression is also widely cultural. Women in the upper half of society don't generally dare say anything vulnerable or feminine, because they know their heads will be jumped on. Feminism has killed femininity as much as it has killed masculinity, because it's the value structure of fat dykes, not women. Until we can get back to reality where the obvious trends in differences between men and women define society, people will continue to not get what they want.