Quote: (02-23-2019 09:09 PM)Easy_C Wrote:
Quote: (02-20-2019 10:16 PM)Seadog Wrote:
Although I don't watch a lot of TV I do now and again succumb to old gems like Simpsons/Family guy/Futurama from late 90s/early 2000s.
I actually thought of this very thing a couple years ago when watching an old episode of Futurama. Basically Bender was going to be written off a wrestling show he was on, so they completely changed his persona from 'Bender the offender' to a cross dressing sissy tranny named 'The Gender Bender' and all the humorous tropes that go with it.
I remember watching this, chuckling, and thinking how in a short decade you went from openly being able to mock these sort of things, to having a mob at your door demanding trial by fire because you showed a woman/minority/tranny who wasn't the best at everything ever.
Same thought occured to me earlier. You don't even have to look that far back to get to a world where the insanity wasn't even on the same level. Besides the shows you've mentioned, things like Beavis and Butthead, King of the Hill, and the GEICO caveman ads, South Park, and plenty of things already named openly mocked today's mainstream leftist ideas as whacko.
Even then (late 90s) being part of a family was generally viewed as a good thing and the rot was still slowly spreading out from the record labels into the rest of society.
I can't help but see the early levels of the brainwashing in that clip.
On the surface it's making fun of people who violate the sexual social norm: a man dressing in pink, a woman wearing army boots. But they're not the butt of the joke. The butt of the joke is the wrestling audience, who are so worked up over a costume that they're screaming for blood. It's implied that blue collar America is too stupid to explain why Bender dressing in pink is upsetting - that they really don't have a good reason for it, it's just blind prejudice - there's nothing wrong with him being the Gender Bender, the 'evil' in this situation is the cynical corporation using gays as a punching bag to rile up the dumb masses.
(Read: the evil republicans riling up the dumb masses over Muh Bible to secure a permanent voting block.)
Okay, so what's the alternative? What do I want to see? Picking on gays and trannies as the butts of every joke? No, that's just an earlier step in the process. You have to smash both sides of the Hegelian dialectic to get out of it, not pine for the previous step.
I miss our cutlure's ability to incorporate those who don't fit perfectly into norms. These days, cultural historians obsess over whether Leonardo DaVinci was gay, or whom Oscar Wilde was sleeping with; how about admiration and acknowledgement of the dandy? It's an interesting phenomenon, seeing a man pay as much attention to his wardrobe as a woman, but in a distinctly masculine manner. This is a consistent male archetype, throughout history, that got rejected and pushed to the fringes in cookie-cutter 1950s society. Then, by pushing them to the fringe they became the reactionary force to the mainstream (thesis, antithesis, synthesis); they became the dispersed and hard-to-find rebels, attacking the complacent and land-locked empire. Stonewall riots, gay rights, et cetera. Now we're entering the synthesis stage, and it turns out it's 8 year old kids in drag.
Give me Oscar Wilde. Give me a culture that sees the light of God in every human being, no matter how weird or atypical they are. Give me a world where a bisexual man can write
a heart-rending story about Christ's sacrifice. Get me away from this land of homogeneity, lifestyle boxes, and forced compliance with the current agenda. Let modernism die.