Quote: (06-18-2018 02:10 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:
Quote: (06-18-2018 10:35 AM)Labienus Wrote:
Quote: (06-18-2018 10:23 AM)RedPillUK Wrote:
Quote: (06-18-2018 09:12 AM)Labienus Wrote:
England lol. Their team is as mediocre as it gets, with the exception of Kane.
They don't come close to 1/10th of the talent they had in their golden generation (1998-2006) and even then they won nothing.
Where does that put Canada then? ![[Image: lol.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/lol.gif)
Canada sucks at football but that's fine, everyone in Canada knows and says it.
The English media overrates English football and their national team constantly and always claims that they are favourite to win the tournament even when they have shitty teams.
How is it fine? It's a huge country yet is consistently worse than teams like Jamaica, Honduras, Costa Rica, Panama and pretty much everyone else in North/Central America and the Carribean and rarely even makes it to the second round of CONCACAF qualifying. Trinidad and Tobago are a much more accomplished football nation. They rarely even get to play teams like the US and Mexico in competitive games.
Why are Canada so bad at football? You can't say because they play other sports because the US plays other sports but still has an ok team. Any mediocre English player would be a superstar for Canada.
Here are some of the main reasons:
1-The other sports in Canada just don't count. In the US, baseball is about as big as football, which is only a little bigger than hoops. The CFL in Canada is a very distant #2. The MLS is in only 3 cities, and is a bit in a no-man's land, because hardcore ethnic soccer fans in those cities don't take it seriously, it's mainly the domain of 'burb culture, Canadian soccer moms and their grown progeny.
2-The majority of Canadian immigrants are from China and India, countries that are stupendously bad at football (esp. the South Asians). It's not like in France, where you end up with a Zidane or a Pogba, players whose roots are in countries that are even more soccer-crazy than the host country. You have a few Balkans in Toronto or Maghrebans in Montreal, but they're a small tile in the local immigrant mosaic. If there were half a million Yugoslavs in Brampton and 700,000 Algerians in Richmond, you'd have stars playing in Europe and a national team that wouldn't get pushed around by freakin Trinidad or Belize.
3-Suburban culture is a very hostile environment for player and talent development. See the USMNT, which has stagnated for the past 2-3 decades. The world's great soccer nations combine a playground culture with a sophisticated native style along with a structured club culture, countries like Argentina, Brazil or France. In N. America, you have playdates and 7-yr olds who play on teams and waste their time and their parents' time being schlepped across the burbs for a league game. Great for the trophy industry, bad for national football.