Quote: (05-15-2018 08:18 AM)HornyRamone Wrote:
I've worked in customer service in the U.S. and now I live in a developing country where people tolerate a lot more. What you don't appreciate is how spoiled and entitled Americans are in general and American women are in particular compared to the rest of the world.
I remember first associating with Americans and was always taken aback over the Yank's Ultra-Fussiness. They'd find personal affront - something isn't up to their high standards - in a lone peanut. Almost like a Little God / Slave interaction. It was a great way to understand the nature of Narcissism. Since this kind of thing was at extreme odds with the Laconic Nature of Australians, an American in the mix meant constant cringe and social awkwardness, though now I just understand it as a stereotypical expectation of behaviour to keep in mind to keep things flowing smoothly.
Due to the poison of Cultural Imperialism, a large chunk of the younger Australian generation is now mentally-American. Hyper-fussy, precious and opinionated. I see the nadir of this type as Slightly-Chubby White Urban Office Workers - the type who would read Buzzfeed, consume so much entertainment media that they see themselves as the star of a television show, and think all other races gratefully orbit their sun of their whiteness. They'd need to be seen drinking branded coffee to fit their scripts.
The Soy Boys are at Starbucks, thinking they're being illuminated by her rays, but, in reality, act as distant spheres around their celestial bodies, barely being touched by distant rays of light, with Scientists arguing that they're most likely not planets. They think they're Mercury, but they're Pluto,
even when they're in a relationship with one of these girls.
Anyway, these Chubby Urban Girls won't put up with Homelessness if it truly does descend on Starbucks: you'll simply see social media virtue signalling as usual but
Physical Basic Bitch Flight from Starbucks.
Quote:Quote:
A place stinking of piss, shit and ball sweat will drive most Starcuck's customers away over time.
If you truly-understand Female Thought, their unspoken rationalisation, pre-Flight can be anticipated via my four rules:
Rule #1 (Desired Wants = Deserved Rights):
"I don't
deserve to smell shit when I'm drinking coffee."
Rule #2 (Laziest Solution):
"I'll go to a different store that excludes the homeless."
Rule #3 (Justifying Transgression Inwardly):
"It's nice that Starbucks is helping the homeless and all, but tolerating the smell of shit is for Commoners, and, well,
I'm a Princess."
Rule #4 (Justifying Transgression Outwardly By Publicly-Offering Up Their Moral Transgression as Evidence of their Higher Morality):
Example 1: "Starbucks is just
so corporate, you know? It's important to support local businesses."
Example 2: "I'm boycotting Starbucks. I know they did, like racial bias training and all, but haven't you noticed how white all their servers are?"
Example 3: "Haven't you been to that little Italian Bar around the corner? OMG, their coffee is
so amazeballs."
A large part of Game is in anticipating Rule 4 Responses and pricking that bubble to put them on the spot.
If I was in a playful, early-game mood, I might, say, to example #3: "Yeah a friend used to go there, but the she told me their coffee wasn't Fair Trade. [Escalate before she responds] How'd you miss all the protests last year? There were picket lines and everything."
Translation: "A
good person, who wasn't self-absorbed would have known that place was bad."
Note it doesn't matter if what you're saying is true or not. You're teasing them. It works better if they eventually fluster themselves into a corner, then understand you were only teasing them to begin with.
My mate Bill is fantastic at revving up the hamster before putting it on the wheel and letting it go.
If I was in a more stone-faced mood, I'd simply say "Ah, I never liked Starbucks before, but now its full of homeless people and, well, [owning it]
they smell like shit."
ie.
I see you.
That could be delivered in a more jokey manner too, but, note the complicated rationalization process she has to go through first to avoid negative social repercussions for voicing that thought aloud? And why you bluntly-stating what she is trying to hide pierces that and generates attraction and a sense of connection?