Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/JustinWhang/status/992076196358840320/photo/1][/url]

Women absolutely cannot imagine that introverted smart, but shy men can become experienced pussy-slayers with the mere application of evo-psych.

They should crawl perfect out of their wombs, be dominant Alpha pussy-slayers at age 12. In essence it is a misunderstanding of gender-differences. It is even now replicated in their feminazi-fiction. The male hero when taking the example of the archetype in Star Wars - the male hero is nothing at the beginning, he is a punk who knows a few things, but gets his ass handed to him constantly. Only after severe training and loss does he beat the biggest villain and triumph.

In contrast the female Rey is born perfect. She learns everything effortlessly, everyone loves her, she learns all the skills instantly, she beats the big baddie after a few minutes of solid pussy-based concentration - no training necessary. She is perfect, because she is born perfect.

That is what they imagine the male Christian Grey to be - a 25yo-self-made-billionaire who had the time for hundreds of girls, lots of sex and also a fulfilling super-career. He also had the time to be in perfect shape, work out all the time and be the all-dominant man with Game that he was simply born with.

It would be disgusting to them if Christian Grey was a shy, slightly overweight bloke at age 16. They would hate that and would have loved to kill him at age 16.

Quote: (05-04-2018 04:19 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

Conversely that's why they hate the idea of "game" being an acquired skill set. The possibility that pussy tingling attributes are not 100% innate and can be "manufactured" in some way is terrifying. So much so that its labeled as "tricking" women rather than developing the skills to give women what they want.

See my point? If they can tell themselves they were 'tricked' by 'game' - which is simply experience at understanding women's predictable patterns of emotional terrorism to swifty-navigate them by - realistically - sleeping with enough of them to see the common patterns, it absolves them of responsibility for their sexual choices, and thereby creates a Subjective Reality of being victimized by a man, rather than freely-choosing to sleep with him.

I think - also - Modern Women often think they're starring in a movie. Game, isn't a 'trick' - it's refusing to play your required part in their script. Note when 'Gone With The Wind' - written by a woman - ends: When Rhett Butler refuses to put up with Scarlett's emotional harassment any more. He leaves for good, and, as far as the writer was concerned there was no more story because the Romantic Hero wrote himself out of it.

Note, also, Game also threatens the 'movie heroine' narcissism by reinforcing that they're not Unique, and most girls try the same tired bullshit every other girl tries to land a man, rather than what does work: Traditional Girl Game.

[Rhyme, remember those 'Sigma' lyrics I sent you a while back, where an Ex wrote a song calling me a 'bastard', so I wrote two songs that were Agree and Amplifys, one saying "You chose me because I was a prick and you wanted no-strings sex, then tried to convince yourself that I wasn't a prick when you then tried to rewrite this reality into expecting an emotional commitment from me", the second saying, 'Yeah, i'm the worst bastard in your long history of all those worst bastards that, oddly, you seem to keep choosing of your own free will'." Do they make more sense now? If she expected me to write a song, she'd be expecting "I'm sorry", or "I never meant to hurt you", thereby winning dominance over me. I'm not accepting her frame of Emotional Harassment, where she's a strong independent woman in charge of her sexuality she's using to bait guys with in the hope of finding 'love', and then suddenly a sad crying kitty under a tree under a rainstorm when her attempts at emotional manipulation fail because she's decided to change the rules halfway through the game].

^ Oh, that reminds me. The Kid rang me for advice last night. He'd asked me a few months back, "How can you tell if a girl really likes you?" and I'd said "She'll tell you she's not like all the other girls." Bill had scoffed his agreement.

He'd set up a date last night on Tinder, and was looking for advice before the meeting. He read out the texts, which ended with her agreeing to meet. Her final message, as an afterthought, a few minutes later: "I'd never normally do this."

Uh-huh.

My thoughts amounted to that all he had to do was react to her bullshit the same way he'd react to his (crazy Gamma) Dad's. He wouldn't. I said "Have you noticed how you're the detached voice of reason in your group of friends, and don't get emotionally-worked up the same way they do, and so you're always the one talking them off the ledge? Keep doing that."

It's because he teases them for overreacting. He'll be fine.

Quote: (05-04-2018 04:27 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/JustinWhang/status/992076196358840320/photo/1][/url]

This is a really good discussion and I hate to derail it, but I can't get this out of my head...

What the fuck is up with the binoculars? Is it so he can find fly chicks to swoop from 500 meters away? Is he planning on staging amphibious landings inbetween ONSs and he doesn't think he'll have time to change? Is it just so that girls will come up to him and say, "What the fuck is up with the binoculars?"

What's the deal with them?

Quote: (05-04-2018 01:01 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Quote: (05-04-2018 05:06 AM)Kona Wrote:  

Quote: (05-03-2018 07:20 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Is it racist of me to read Ellen K.Pao as "Ellen KaPOW!" as if early era Batman just punched a baddie?

I read her as "Ellen Kung Pao" and that's as in kung pao chicken. Then I saw the pictures and I thought she should fight General Tso.

But to answer the question: Yes, its racist.

Aloha!

But is it systemic racism, impulsive racism, unconscious racism, comic racism, Australian xeno-racism, or virtuous racism?

Anyway, don't you have a volcano to worry about?

Wouldn't have to worry if we could still throw the haoles in there. Switching to racism on the internet is not pleasing the volcano gods.

Aloha!

Quote: (05-04-2018 06:37 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Quote: (05-04-2018 04:27 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/JustinWhang/status/992076196358840320/photo/1][/url]

This is a really good discussion and I hate to derail it, but I can't get this out of my head...

What the fuck is up with the binoculars? Is it so he can find fly chicks to swoop from 500 meters away? Is he planning on staging amphibious landings inbetween ONSs and he doesn't think he'll have time to change? Is it just so that girls will come up to him and say, "What the fuck is up with the binoculars?"

What's the deal with them?

Theyre called Babe goggles. Theyre for last call at the club and times running out. If you turn them the around and use them the wrong way a fat 3 will look like a petite 5 and then he can say "That'll do little pig, that'll do"

Quote: (05-04-2018 01:01 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

Quote: (05-04-2018 05:06 AM)Kona Wrote:  

Quote: (05-03-2018 07:20 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Is it racist of me to read Ellen K.Pao as "Ellen KaPOW!" as if early era Batman just punched a baddie?

I read her as "Ellen Kung Pao" and that's as in kung pao chicken. Then I saw the pictures and I thought she should fight General Tso.

But to answer the question: Yes, its racist.

Aloha!

But is it systemic racism, impulsive racism, unconscious racism, comic racism, Australian xeno-racism, or virtuous racism?

Anyway, don't you have a volcano to worry about?

You're missing the "reincarnation of Adolf" and "all of the above" options.

Quote: (05-04-2018 06:37 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Quote: (05-04-2018 04:27 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

This is a really good discussion and I hate to derail it, but I can't get this out of my head...

What the fuck is up with the binoculars? Is it so he can find fly chicks to swoop from 500 meters away? Is he planning on staging amphibious landings inbetween ONSs and he doesn't think he'll have time to change? Is it just so that girls will come up to him and say, "What the fuck is up with the binoculars?"

What's the deal with them?

It's for exactly what you just did.

Girl - "Why the fuck are you wearing binoculars"
You - *Initialize mystery method step 1*

Quote: (05-04-2018 06:37 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Quote: (05-04-2018 04:27 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Quote:[/url]

This is a really good discussion and I hate to derail it, but I can't get this out of my head...

What the fuck is up with the binoculars? Is it so he can find fly chicks to swoop from 500 meters away? Is he planning on staging amphibious landings inbetween ONSs and he doesn't think he'll have time to change? Is it just so that girls will come up to him and say, "What the fuck is up with the binoculars?"

What's the deal with them?

Heartiste had a good take on it. It has to be viewed through the context of the 1990s when Mystery developed it.

He walked into a room and got noticed. Then when he approached girls, he simply told them that he went to a Burning Man festival (or something similar) and that is why he was dressed this way. The reason for this of course was that he wanted to be noticed and that was his excuse.

At the time of the show this extreme peacocking was already useless. It's only effective when ONE GUY DOES IT and no one else knows what even Game is. It already stops being useful if 2 men do it or other guys walk around this. Some moderate form of peacocking is still useful, so the science is not dead.

[url=https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/03/19/the-final-word-on-peacocking/]https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2014/03/...eacocking/

Mystery has co-created modern Game and deserves respect for that - everyone should have read his basic tenets - he still travels around sometimes seen with young hotties:



Though he remained Blue Pill internally for a long time having one-itis for a girl, but that was also long before sites like Rational Male Red Pilled men on more than just seduction, but also how to create a better relationship-mindset.

We need a separate thread on how the word "incel" has become the latest outrage in mainstream media.

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

My opinion: Why not? The government already provides women with pseudo-husbands in the form the welfare state. They already get them discount food with the WIC Program (Women, Infants and Children).

This has created a culture that's brought us to "incels." The girl you would have married 40 years ago already has a kid by a bad boy who left town, so the government is now her husband.

Who says it's right for the government to help the woman (and, by extension, her irresponsible baby daddy), but not men (who make up the majority of the homeless, by the way).

Neither the harpy feminists or the white knight conservatives view this situation for what it is. So let's at least be honest about it here. The government helped cause this. Maybe they should help solve it.

Quote: (05-05-2018 09:49 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

We need a separate thread on how the word "incel" has become the latest outrage in mainstream media.

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

My opinion: Why not? The government already provides women with pseudo-husbands in the form the welfare state. They already get them discount food with the WIC Program (Women, Infants and Children).

This has created a culture that's brought us to "incels." The girl you would have married 40 years ago already has a kid by a bad boy who left town, so the government is now her husband.

Who says it's right for the government to help the woman (and, by extension, her irresponsible baby daddy), but not men (who make up the majority of the homeless, by the way).

Neither the harpy feminists or the white knight conservatives view this situation for what it is. So let's at least be honest about it here. The government helped cause this. Maybe they should help solve it.

In the school shooting thread I made a joke about Board of Education sponsored hookers in schools. Even say one session every 90 days would be enough to look forward to, and keep a kid from going postal. A smokey with some ball cradling at the end of every semester would save lives

Quote: (05-05-2018 09:49 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

We need a separate thread on how the word "incel" has become the latest outrage in mainstream media.

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

My opinion: Why not? The government already provides women with pseudo-husbands in the form the welfare state. They already get them discount food with the WIC Program (Women, Infants and Children).

This has created a culture that's brought us to "incels." The girl you would have married 40 years ago already has a kid by a bad boy who left town, so the government is now her husband.

Who says it's right for the government to help the woman (and, by extension, her irresponsible baby daddy), but not men (who make up the majority of the homeless, by the way).

Neither the harpy feminists or the white knight conservatives view this situation for what it is. So let's at least be honest about it here. The government helped cause this. Maybe they should help solve it.

The government solves chick problems because chicks are the government. Look at the entry-level bureaucrats at some government agency and it'll be a strong majority of women. These agencies exist to find more work for themselves and expand, so it's natural that they expand toward the interests and agenda of their employees.

Government moves too slowly to answer to incels, unless they form some kind of wedge voting bloc, like what happened to pass Prohibition. The Incel Party, can you imagine it?

The incel problem will be solved, if at all, by Silicon Valley. Ellen Pao, for once, is right. Tech companies have large populations of incels. They have every incentive to create some incel soothing technology because it'll make billions of dollars of profit and their employees will vigorously pursue it. In addition, these companies are sitting on a warchest of money that is being spent on all kinds of research into bizarre and impractical applications. What's another moonshot for a virtual pussy? Whether it's a Matrix-like virtual world where you can fuck, or a virtual girlfriend on your smartphone, or a sex robot, I can't predict, but the fortune awaiting is massive.

Let's be realistic about two things.

1. Tech company incels, if they exist, are not at risk of going postal. They're not part of the "have nothing to lose" demographic. Given how well tech workers get paid, even seeing an escort once a week will not make a huge dent in their wallets.

2. It'll be a cold day in hell before these tech companies make any kind of virtual sex products. It would never get past the idea stage due to the outcry it would trigger.

Quote: (05-05-2018 09:49 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

We need a separate thread on how the word "incel" has become the latest outrage in mainstream media.

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

The collusion of dictated talking points being seeded from one source. Nothing is co-incidence.

Which makes me think, if certain Government Faction and its media allies can waste time over - let's be real - minor bullshit like this, how threatened is the old power structure Trump claims to be about to replace, really? If its aim is to shut down the Chans to silence Q, the cats long out of the bag there.

The media should be scrambling for their lives over Uranium One and the Iran Deal, but, instead, they're queefing over Incels. They're either still holding power, or so in the bubble they have no idea just how screwed they are. I guess it's a coin toss.

Quote: (05-05-2018 03:18 PM)BlueMark Wrote:  

Let's be realistic about two things.

1. Tech company incels, if they exist, are not at risk of going postal. They're not part of the "have nothing to lose" demographic. Given how well tech workers get paid, even seeing an escort once a week will not make a huge dent in their wallets.

2. It'll be a cold day in hell before these tech companies make any kind of virtual sex products. It would never get past the idea stage due to the outcry it would trigger.

Which is why the Japanese will once again beat the US to the market. Just like they did with the transistor radio, portable tape recorder, VCR, the compact car, and scads of other products.

Who want inferior US products anyway? Hell, most of us don't want real women from the US, so why would we want the country's virtual women?

Quote: (05-05-2018 03:50 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Quote: (05-05-2018 09:49 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

We need a separate thread on how the word "incel" has become the latest outrage in mainstream media.

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

The collusion of dictated talking points being seeded from one source. Nothing is co-incidence.

Which makes me think, if certain Government Faction and its media allies can waste time over - let's be real - minor bullshit like this, how threatened is the old power structure Trump claims to be about to replace, really? If its aim is to shut down the Chans to silence Q, the cats long out of the bag there.

The media should be scrambling for their lives over Uranium One and the Iran Deal, but, instead, they're queefing over Incels. They're either still holding power, or so in the bubble they have no idea just how screwed they are. I guess it's a coin toss.

Highly unlikely.

If "Q" was something they actually wanted silence, we would have seen the chans get the wikileaks treatment where they're shut off from the financial system and people affiliated with it start committing suicide by multiple gunshot wound to the head.

Anybody who wants mandatory girlfriends for male incels needs to keep in mind that the pendulum swings both ways, and that somebody is going to have to be the mandatory boyfriend for female incels...

Days of Broken Arrows, may I introduce you to your new, government-mandated girlfriend:

Quote: (05-05-2018 05:56 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Anybody who wants mandatory girlfriends for male incels needs to keep in mind that the pendulum swings both ways, and that somebody is going to have to be the mandatory boyfriend for female incels...

Days of Broken Arrows, may I introduce you to your new, government-mandated girlfriend:

Thanks, but I grew up with an illness and therefore will be able to get a deferment from the Government Girlfriend Program. Also, I have aged out of the draft at this point.

I hereby nominate PapayaTapper, Zelcorpion, and DJ-Matt to take my place on the front lines. I would nominate Debeguiled, but no one can spell his name.

PS: I'm guessing she's not quite the incel you think and if she put "looking for sex!" in a classified ad, she'd be swamped with replies. The bar is very, very low when it comes to what things men do, sad to say.

Quote: (05-05-2018 07:12 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

Quote: (05-05-2018 05:56 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Anybody who wants mandatory girlfriends for male incels needs to keep in mind that the pendulum swings both ways, and that somebody is going to have to be the mandatory boyfriend for female incels...

Days of Broken Arrows, may I introduce you to your new, government-mandated girlfriend:

Thanks, but I grew up with an illness and therefore will be able to get a deferment from the Government Girlfriend Program. Also, I have aged out of the draft at this point.

I hereby nominate PapayaTapper, Zelcorpion, and DJ-Matt to take my place on the front lines. I would nominate Debeguiled, but no one can spell his name.

PS: I'm guessing she's not quite the incel you think and if she put "looking for sex!" in a classified ad, she'd be swamped with replies. The bar is very, very low when it comes to what things men do, sad to say.

Thanks but I dont eat pork much less stick my meatsicle in it.

I would rather choose prison or seppuku before I would share my life with this.



Besides - I live in an area where most women are bangable and slim and where the Antifa crowd numbers 50 while the nationalist hotties and Trump supporters are 50.000 strong in demonstrations.

My family and friends in Canada have a more dire fate, though none of them needs a mandatory girlfriend.

Though my guess is that many men here would react in a similar fashion if given their mandatory fugly beast:

Quote: (05-05-2018 09:49 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

I've noticed several threads on Reddit and articles at Jezebel saying things like "Incels want government to provide them with girlfriends."

Most everyone is a libertarian when it comes to their money/person/property.

And a filthy, slithering socialist when it comes to everyone else's money/person/property.

Quote: (05-05-2018 05:56 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Anybody who wants mandatory girlfriends for male incels needs to keep in mind that the pendulum swings both ways, and that somebody is going to have to be the mandatory boyfriend for female incels...

Days of Broken Arrows, may I introduce you to your new, government-mandated girlfriend:

A surprisingly honest article written by a feminist:
https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/2018...4424006185

An excerpt:

Quote:Eleanor Robertson Wrote:

...The nexus between Houellebecq’s depiction of male sexual alienation in the 1990s and incel culture in the present points to an underlying feature of life under modern capitalism for many young heterosexual men. It’s difficult to acknowledge the descriptive correctness of this position without giving the prescriptive features of inceldom succour, but I have found this to be the most fruitful way of looking at things.

Women have been rivalrous goods in human civilisation for a very long time. This is not some quirk of ideology out of which we could have educated ourselves: it has been a crucial fact of material reality. Different societies have mitigated the disruptive potential of this rivalry in different ways, but most have used variations on the social structure we now call patriarchy. In order for society to be able to reproduce itself in a more or less peaceful fashion, women have been reduced to the status of property, with various taboos, prohibitions and institutions governing our behaviour.

One of the main functions of these practices is to provide men with some measure of certainty that their women, their property, are not at risk of being stolen by other men. In pre-1960s Western society, the favoured practices were virginity, marriage and housewifery. Feminist legal theorist Carole Pateman, in her groundbreaking 1988 book The Sexual Contract, describes marriage as “the vehicle through which men transform their natural right over women into the security of civil patriarchal right”.

The key concept here, and the one whose absence permeates both inceldom and Houellebecq’s Whatever, is security. Patriarchal security, delivered through monogamous marriage, ensured that most heterosexual men could be sure of accessing sex, affection, reproductive labour and so on, through marrying a wife. During the past 50 years, this security has evaporated. Out of the ashes of compulsory marriage has emerged a more or less free market in sex. Like the supersession of feudalism by capitalism, this state of affairs has produced some big pros and some big cons.

On one hand, women are granted measures of self-determination that would have been unimaginable in the past. We are no longer considered patriarchal chattel. I do not yearn to return to a time when my personal activities would be ruthlessly policed, and my sexuality strictly regulated, to ensure a stable society.

On the other hand, the death of these rules, as with the death of feudal rules, produces a ruthless and unstable state of competition between individuals for resources. This expresses itself most intensely in inceldom. When women are free to choose their sexual partners, they understandably tend towards men who are some combination of attractive, psychologically stable and financially secure. The free market, as always, isn’t exactly free – it produces winners and losers, and the sorting of people into these categories corresponds closely to various forms of unearned advantage, such as physical looks, inherited wealth, the benefit of early socialisation and competent parenting, and so on...

Quote: (05-05-2018 05:56 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  

Anybody who wants mandatory girlfriends for male incels needs to keep in mind that the pendulum swings both ways, and that somebody is going to have to be the mandatory boyfriend for female incels...

Days of Broken Arrows, may I introduce you to your new, government-mandated girlfriend:

This reminds me of the "Federal Bureau of Sex" from Futurama. This, presumably, is what you get there.

On a bleak "burn it all down" kind of day I would simply tell all the incels "go join islam".

The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend, but he can be perfectly useful fodder.