I'm doing a live stream on Thursday 6:45pm. I plan on taking calls.
The people have demanded this stream, so I will provide.
The people have demanded this stream, so I will provide.
Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
Tradthot live stream with me, Nick Funetes, Laura Loomer, Davis Aurini
You mean Lauren Southern, Faith Goldy, & Brittany Pettibone didn't want to join the stream? Imagine my shock!
Happy to see Aurini in there.
Happy to see Aurini in there.
Doing some homework:
Is this gonna conflict with the normal Thursday Aurini show?
Aloha!
Aloha!
I'm catching this live from Melbourne Australia
All right who here is Halukcan.
EDIT
And Elisha Long
EDIT
And Elisha Long
1,007 viewers right now!
Best rating so far, breaking the four-figure barrier.
Best rating so far, breaking the four-figure barrier.
First caller- JQ-every time.
Delicious Tacos is the voice of my generation....
Faith Goldy's voice is insufferable...
Yeah, she needs some dialect lessons.
You want to know the only thing you can assume about a broken down old man? It's that he's a survivor.
This Laura chick is 24? Looks way older.
![[Image: mindblown2.png]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/mindblown2.png)
Date a camwhore, lol.
Gold.
Gold.
Quote: (01-25-2018 08:00 PM)Huey Wrote:
Faith Goldy's voice is insufferable...
She's a new media tradthot hustler. She's been trained to have a deep voice. Also the amount of dick that's been in the back of that throat...
(...I'd happily add to her number, if I could swing it without losing too much dignity. Team Thirsty But Only Up To A Certain Point)
Roosh and Davis, I really enjoyed the livestream, but I think you guys were way too nice to Laura Loomer and failed to call her out for a lot of the BS she was saying. I get that you guys weren't going to insult her and fight with her (and I wouldn't expect you to), but I think you could have definitely called her out in a respectful way for some of the things she was saying.
I guess the one thing that bothered me the most was that she kept saying that women shouldn't be "afraid" or "ashamed" of their sexuality, and was basically saying that it is unrealistic to expect a woman not to sleep around before marriage. Several times during the stream, Laura mentioned that she has engaged in casual sex, and she seemed to be saying that sleeping around is not bad for women as long as they are honest about it. I think this is very bad advice for women, and I think you guys could have called her out for it.
At one point, Laura even said something to the effect of "men and women can be happy in open relationships." Roosh then responded by asking her if she believed that a man should tolerate his woman sleeping around, but the subject quickly got changed and Laura never really answered Roosh's question.
Also, there were a lot of times where you guys (Roosh and Davis) would say that women shouldn't be doing X, Y, or Z, and should instead focus on finding a good man to start a family with, but then you would quickly add "Laura is an exception to this, she is very strong and not like other women" (or something to that effect).
I don't know Laura, and she very well might be the exception to the rule, but I don't really think it's good for women in general to think of themselves as the "exception."
Other than that, Laura had some very good points. Other than what I mentioned above, I pretty much agreed with most of what she was saying.
I thought it was a very good stream and I enjoyed it very much. I think Roosh and Davis Aurini are some of the best content producers on Youtube. I always listen to their videos and livestreams when I'm at work. I really like the recent call-in livestreams you guys have been doing. I'm looking forward to more of them in the future. Keep up the good work.
I guess the one thing that bothered me the most was that she kept saying that women shouldn't be "afraid" or "ashamed" of their sexuality, and was basically saying that it is unrealistic to expect a woman not to sleep around before marriage. Several times during the stream, Laura mentioned that she has engaged in casual sex, and she seemed to be saying that sleeping around is not bad for women as long as they are honest about it. I think this is very bad advice for women, and I think you guys could have called her out for it.
At one point, Laura even said something to the effect of "men and women can be happy in open relationships." Roosh then responded by asking her if she believed that a man should tolerate his woman sleeping around, but the subject quickly got changed and Laura never really answered Roosh's question.
Also, there were a lot of times where you guys (Roosh and Davis) would say that women shouldn't be doing X, Y, or Z, and should instead focus on finding a good man to start a family with, but then you would quickly add "Laura is an exception to this, she is very strong and not like other women" (or something to that effect).
I don't know Laura, and she very well might be the exception to the rule, but I don't really think it's good for women in general to think of themselves as the "exception."
Other than that, Laura had some very good points. Other than what I mentioned above, I pretty much agreed with most of what she was saying.
I thought it was a very good stream and I enjoyed it very much. I think Roosh and Davis Aurini are some of the best content producers on Youtube. I always listen to their videos and livestreams when I'm at work. I really like the recent call-in livestreams you guys have been doing. I'm looking forward to more of them in the future. Keep up the good work.
^^^^
Loomer also said she didn't understand the so-called "anti-semitism" of some guy who was apparently dating a Jewish woman but expressed anti-Jewish views. That makes perfect sense to me. So let me explain this. It's a simple concept: Group vs. individual.
1). We judge groups as groups and the way we do that is by stereotypes. Usually those stereotypes are true -- which is how they came about to begin with.
2). When we meet individuals, we judge them as people. Everyone we meet is part of a larger group, but we don't see them as "the group." We see them as the individuals we know.
Therefore:
You can be a person who is very put off by black culture (let's say) because of crime stats, gangster culture, etc. Yet at the same time you can be best friends with a black guy.
How can this be?
It's because you assessed the group as the group and the individual as the individual. Not all individuals are representative of the group.
Got that, everyone? This should be pretty obvious, but I think Loomer is underhandedly pushing the "personal is the political" feminist B.S. concept by bringing this up.
To continue on my main point: There could be a spate of shootings in Baltimore while you and your black best friend map out plans for a computer program. It's not his problem. He's a person, not an ambassador for his race or a symbol of it.
The same goes for any group. You can hate the mafia, but like Italians. You can think the mid-East is a dump but have a bunch of friends from there.
Or you can despise the Jewish influence in media but marry a Jewish woman. She's not personally responsible for the bias on World News Tonight or what goes on at MTV. Hell, she might not even know about it -- or may hate it more than you.
So, I hope that explains away this so-called hypocrisy. Group vs. individual. It's not that hard a concept.
Loomer also said she didn't understand the so-called "anti-semitism" of some guy who was apparently dating a Jewish woman but expressed anti-Jewish views. That makes perfect sense to me. So let me explain this. It's a simple concept: Group vs. individual.
1). We judge groups as groups and the way we do that is by stereotypes. Usually those stereotypes are true -- which is how they came about to begin with.
2). When we meet individuals, we judge them as people. Everyone we meet is part of a larger group, but we don't see them as "the group." We see them as the individuals we know.
Therefore:
You can be a person who is very put off by black culture (let's say) because of crime stats, gangster culture, etc. Yet at the same time you can be best friends with a black guy.
How can this be?
It's because you assessed the group as the group and the individual as the individual. Not all individuals are representative of the group.
Got that, everyone? This should be pretty obvious, but I think Loomer is underhandedly pushing the "personal is the political" feminist B.S. concept by bringing this up.
To continue on my main point: There could be a spate of shootings in Baltimore while you and your black best friend map out plans for a computer program. It's not his problem. He's a person, not an ambassador for his race or a symbol of it.
The same goes for any group. You can hate the mafia, but like Italians. You can think the mid-East is a dump but have a bunch of friends from there.
Or you can despise the Jewish influence in media but marry a Jewish woman. She's not personally responsible for the bias on World News Tonight or what goes on at MTV. Hell, she might not even know about it -- or may hate it more than you.
So, I hope that explains away this so-called hypocrisy. Group vs. individual. It's not that hard a concept.
Quote: (01-25-2018 10:41 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:
I guess the one thing that bothered me the most was that she kept saying that women shouldn't be "afraid" or "ashamed" of their sexuality, and was basically saying that it is unrealistic to expect a woman not to sleep around before marriage. Several times during the stream, Laura mentioned that she has engaged in casual sex, and she seemed to be saying that sleeping around is not bad for women as long as they are honest about it. I think this is very bad advice for women, and I think you guys could have called her out for it.
Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism:
The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.
![[Image: angel.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/angel.gif)
↑ ↑
Exactly, which is why it was weird that she was able to get away with saying all that without anyone calling her out or expressing disagreement.
Like I said, I totally get that you guys didn't want to insult her or create drama (especially after the way Baked Alaska's stream with Laura turned out), but I have to say, if I wasn't previously familiar with you and Roosh's work before hearing tonight's livestream, I would be inclined to think you guys agreed with Laura that it's okay for women to have casual sex as long as they are honest about it.
Also, Laura seems to really enjoy the sound of her own voice. There were 4 people (5 at one point) on the livestream, and I would bet money that Laura was talking at least 50% of the time, if not more.
Exactly, which is why it was weird that she was able to get away with saying all that without anyone calling her out or expressing disagreement.
Like I said, I totally get that you guys didn't want to insult her or create drama (especially after the way Baked Alaska's stream with Laura turned out), but I have to say, if I wasn't previously familiar with you and Roosh's work before hearing tonight's livestream, I would be inclined to think you guys agreed with Laura that it's okay for women to have casual sex as long as they are honest about it.
Also, Laura seems to really enjoy the sound of her own voice. There were 4 people (5 at one point) on the livestream, and I would bet money that Laura was talking at least 50% of the time, if not more.
Respect to Matt Forney for dialing in from Hungary and calling out the fucked up/slutty behavior of these so called tradhots. He basically dialled in and in a very cool way said all tradhots have mental issues and left : )
I honestly think it would have been a better video if it just had been a podcast between Roosh and Aurini. I had hoped for more, but good thing is that it was still somewhat entertaining!
I think the best format is when it's a kind of a Joe Rogan podcast with two (or maximum 3) people having a chat instead of having like an online talk show.
Peter seemed like a really nice, smart and cool dude but he just wasn't interesting to listen to. Mostly just stating the obvious or bringing up irrelevant stuff on how he had met X in real life and how X was actually not a tradthot. Maybe because it was his first time doing something like this? I give him the benefit of a doubt.
I've never seen Laura before. I think she brought up some good points but she also talked A LOT and I agree she could have been called out more. I checked her Instagram myself and she has multiple of attention seeking selfies on there. The one Roosh questioned her about is far from the only one actually.
http://www.instagram.com/looms93/?hl=sv
With that said, the white knight in me thinks the guys in that BakedAlaska video were a bit too hard on her and saying disrespectful things.
And most callers yesterday were shit this time and super negative. What a pathetic moron who had to call in to prove to everyone that he can get a girl.
Also, Roosh has impressive game when it comes to dealing with haters and trolls. Seeing how he handled them is probably the only thing I'll take with me from this stream.
I think the best format is when it's a kind of a Joe Rogan podcast with two (or maximum 3) people having a chat instead of having like an online talk show.
Peter seemed like a really nice, smart and cool dude but he just wasn't interesting to listen to. Mostly just stating the obvious or bringing up irrelevant stuff on how he had met X in real life and how X was actually not a tradthot. Maybe because it was his first time doing something like this? I give him the benefit of a doubt.
I've never seen Laura before. I think she brought up some good points but she also talked A LOT and I agree she could have been called out more. I checked her Instagram myself and she has multiple of attention seeking selfies on there. The one Roosh questioned her about is far from the only one actually.
http://www.instagram.com/looms93/?hl=sv
With that said, the white knight in me thinks the guys in that BakedAlaska video were a bit too hard on her and saying disrespectful things.
And most callers yesterday were shit this time and super negative. What a pathetic moron who had to call in to prove to everyone that he can get a girl.
Also, Roosh has impressive game when it comes to dealing with haters and trolls. Seeing how he handled them is probably the only thing I'll take with me from this stream.
Major props to Aurini for shouting out Sam Hyde and MDE.
https://youtu.be/J71SYNCcRQI?t=1h45m58s
https://youtu.be/8SwuoDtplfU?t=3m24s
As well as for pouring a drink or two during the feed.
I hope it was Crown Royal, the official booze of Tommy DeSimone.
https://youtu.be/J71SYNCcRQI?t=1h45m58s
https://youtu.be/8SwuoDtplfU?t=3m24s
As well as for pouring a drink or two during the feed.
I hope it was Crown Royal, the official booze of Tommy DeSimone.
The Puritan hated bear-baiting, not because it gave pain to the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators. - Thomas B. Macaulay
Rick Von Slonecker is tall, rich, good-looking, stupid, dishonest, conceited, a bully, liar, drunk and thief, an egomaniac, and probably psychotic. In short, highly attractive to women. - Whit Stillman
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)