But was there any talk in the debate about Paul Ryan being eaten by a bear? Did Trump mention repealing the 8th amendment so Paul Ryan could be chained to the rock with the eagle? That's what's really important here.

Well done Trump.

All anyone ever needed to do was confidently confront that cunt Clinton with her corruption & crimes.
Special prosecutor aye?

I say - Special Prosecutor Pepe!

Someone 'shop a meme of Pepe in a lawyer style business suit.

Quote: (10-09-2016 11:10 PM)Wutang Wrote:  

Quote: (10-09-2016 10:00 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Highlight of the debate:

I prefer the thug life version

My personal fav is the Overwatch version:






Doesn't matter, they're all going viral.

MAGA!!!!!

We're reaching levels of testosterone previously thought unattainable.

   

Wonder what this will be.

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

Wonder what this will be.

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

Wonder what this will be.

Hope it's something good. There's been an awful lot of "OMG VIDEO NUKE INCOMING" from all sides lately.

Like I posted elsewhere, this last month is just going to be nuts, golly gee whiz.

Goddamn time zones. How am I supposed to get thought all this high energy in one hit? If you feel a small thump beneath your feet, that's my vaporised body on the other side of the planet destroying everything within a 500 mile radius.

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

Wonder what this will be.

A journalist posted a week or two ago on Twitter that they had video of Hillary saying things about race that were going to bury her.

If I'm not mistaken, Cernovich retweeted it.

That could be what it is. I'd been wondering what came of it.

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:53 AM)Enigma Wrote:  

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

Wonder what this will be.

A journalist posted a week or two ago on Twitter that they had video of Hillary saying things about race that were going to bury her.

If I'm not mistaken, Cernovich retweeted it.

That could be what it is. I'd been wondering what came of it.

You just know NBC are trolling through all of Trump's mic sound bites from the apprentice. If they find anything out of context they are going to use it. A five million dollar fine is nothing. A mere 'campaign' write off.

The question is whether Trump's team throws their dirt out there early, or whether they wait to see what Hillary has. From my perspective, it seems like both campaigns are playing a game of chicken, and as of this moment, neither know who has the worst dirt. People remember the last thing they hear, and both parties will be well aware of this.

Hillary sat 37 times during the debate

Trump sat 0 times.

I just rewatched some things from tonight.

Mr. Trump started off poorly, he was getting bashed around, and playing by the rules.

It was when they kept trying to take things back to the tape that he said fuck it and went after Bill Clinton that the tide turned and then he was in his element.

He could have been grilling some underperforming subordinates in a boardroom meeting.

The man was made for this, for whatever reason, he was trying to control his instincts, possibly following advice from his people, but when he said fuck it and went after her, the whole house came down.

Goddamn what a glorious night.

I banged a huge breasted Viet girl after.

Field report.

I watched the debate in the same NYC bar we used to watch the first debate. But with the Giants - Packers game on, only the back half of the bar was showing the debate. Standing room only. Very crowded. Place was packed with Hillary supporters.

At the very beginning, Anderson Cooper was reading the sexual assault question, (the part where he said "sexual assault"), and the entire bar agrees that it was sexual assault.

I say, "No it wasn't."

Short, fattish girl in front of me says that it is.

I say, "No, because only the woman being touched can claim it's sexual assault. So your opinion is *irrelevant*."

She visibly felt the word *irrelevant* - immediately flinched in her chest and said, "Wow." Then added, "How can you be so blind? Is it because you just want him to be president? How can you think that what he said was okay?"

I replied, "Imagine being alive in 2016 and thinking that a man's words, but not his actions, define him."

She's silent, and starts texting her friends. Two minutes later, she tries to lecture me about the definition of sexual assault, which reads, "Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient."

But right when she says "recipient", I say, "Exactly. The recipient. Meaning, Not You and Not Anderson Cooper."

About five minutes later, she's leaving right as Mr. Trump is explaining that Bill Clinton had to pay $850,000. And as she's leaving, I say to her back, "Hey, does Bill Clinton's conduct fit the definition of sexual assault?"

My name is MMX2010, and I shitpost in real life now.

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

*POSSIBLE CERNOVICH SCOOP*

Wonder what this will be.

For the love of God Cernovich PLEASE STAY OUT OF GYMS AND BATHTUBS IN THE COMING DAYS.

Quote: (10-10-2016 03:33 AM)DarianFrey Wrote:  

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

*POSSIBLE CERNOVICH SCOOP*

Wonder what this will be.

For the love of God Cernovich PLEASE STAY OUT OF GYMS AND BATHTUBS IN THE COMING DAYS.

And try not to overdose on mouthwash, shoot yourself in the back of the head or crash a helicopter. Oh and watch out for oncoming trains, and dodgy airlines... They seem to crash a lot when Hillary's angry.

Multiple fist pumps. I'm yelling at the screen like a sports fan.

I love how much the mic picks up the YUGE amount of CO2 he seems to inhale right before he delivers a heavy lashing. High fuckin energy!

Quote: (10-10-2016 03:43 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  

Multiple fist pumps. I'm yelling at the screen like a sports fan.

I love how much the mic picks up the YUGE amount of air he seems to inhale right before he delivers a heavy lashing. High fuckin energy!

Quote: (10-10-2016 01:12 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

Scott Adams' quick initial debate analysis:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/15159942156...witzerland

Big win for Mr. Trump.

He also makes a very good case for Switzerland - with which I agree.

.

The full text:

Quote:Quote:

I just watched the debate on replay. Trump won bigly. This one wasn’t close. And keep in mind that I called Clinton the winner of the first debate, and I now endorse Gary Johnson, primarily to avoid being called an alleged enabler of alleged sex abusers and their alleged enablers. That basket of deplorables includes both Bill and Hillary Clinton (the alleged doer and the alleged cleaner-upper) plus Trump and his alleged misdeeds.

Some quick reactions…

1. When the Access Hollywood tape came up, Trump dismissed it as locker room banter that he regrets. You expected that part. The persuasion move was that he quickly contrasted that “small” issue with images of ISIS beheadings, and cage-drownings. It was a high ground maneuver, a powerful visual anchor (like the Rosie O’Donnell move from his first primary debate), and a contrast play. In this framing, Trump cares about saving your life while Clinton cares about your choice of words. I realize the issue is Trump’s alleged deeds, not his words. But in terms of debate persuasion, Trump nailed it hard.

2. Clinton’s body language was defensive. Trump is physically larger and prowled the stage. He won the optics. It only got worse when a fly landed on Clinton’s face mid-answer. Both candidates looked perfect in terms of wardrobe and hair, given what they have to work with.

3. Trump threw in enough random details about Syria to persuade viewers that he knows more than they thought he knew. And he did a great job selling the idea that he knows more than the generals (as ridiculous as that sounds), at least in terms of not announcing where we plan to attack. I agree with the moderator who said there might be good reasons for announcing attacks – such as giving time for civilians to leave – but it wasn’t quite a counter-argument. Trump succeeded in looking informed on Syria, and at the same time reinforced the “can’t keep a secret” theme for Clinton.

4. Trump’s pre-debate show with Bill’s alleged victims dismantled Clinton’s pro-woman high ground before the debate even started. I didn’t see the pre-debate show, but I assume it was impactful. It had to be. Clinton looked shaken from the start.

5. The best quotable moments from the debate are pro-Trump. His comment about putting Clinton in jail has that marvelous visual persuasion quality about it, and it was the laugh of the night, which means it will be repeated endlessly. He also looked like he meant it.

Clinton’s Abe Lincoln defense for two-faced politicking failed as hard as anything can fail. Mrs. Clinton, I knew Abe Lincoln, and you’re no Abe Lincoln. You know that was in your head. Or it will be.

6. Most of the rest was policy stuff that no one understands or cares about. We don’t know how to fix Obamacare or what to do with TPP. But by acting competent on these and other policy issues, Trump gains more than Clinton in persuasion.

7. Trump attacked Clinton on emails, and did a good job. His base needed that.

8. Clinton had to defend her “deplorables” comment. She said she regretted it. Regret isn’t what the public wanted to hear. That’s about her. They wanted to hear that she doesn’t think that way. She failed to address the emotional part of that topic, and that’s a persuasion fail.

9. Trump defended his “extreme” vetting fairly well, but he did miss a huge opportunity for reframing. Trump mentioned the need for Muslims to help the country by informing on known terrorists in their ranks. He could have gone a step farther and said that he takes responsibility for some Islamophobia by his tough talk, but the solution to Islamaphobia is not what Trump says or does going forward. The solution is for the community itself to self-police the bad elements in its ranks. You can think that is unfair – because it is – but it might be the only solution in the long run.

—

I talked to a Swiss local yesterday about American politics. He says everyone in Switzerland is following the race closely. He favors Trump because he thinks Trump would be better for the global economy. I asked if anyone he knows in Switzerland is worried about Trump’s “temperament” and having his finger on the nukes. The Swiss man literally laughed. I had trouble explaining why that was even a topic in the United States. Apparently their news sources filter out some of that stuff. He wasn’t worried and didn’t know anyone who is. (But this is a data point of one. Don’t assume too much.)

I also asked the Swiss man what kind of problems they have in Switzerland. He laughed again. The answer is “none.” Literally.

Good economy.

Plenty of jobs.

No racial strife.

Low crime rate.

Highest standard of living.

No real pollution.

No litter.

No homeless that I could see.

He also told me that it is illegal to build a mosque in Switzerland because they don’t want to change their national character, which is 95% Christian he estimated. He said (and I did not fact-check) that the Swiss allow no immigration at all unless the person has special skills or marries a citizen.

And the gun ownership in Switzerland is 100% for adult males. That’s their militia. Yet crime is low.

Make of that what you will. It’s simplistic to think that a total ban on immigration plus universal male gun-ownership helps Switzerland have no real problems. But you can’t rule it out, either.

Trump is trying to make America a bit more like Switzerland. Clinton is trying to make America less like Switzerland. Spend a day in Switzerland and tell me who has the better plan. This country is amazing.

Watching the debate now.

I had to pause it, it's too high energy. Hill's all over the place.

Today is glorious!

Quote: (10-10-2016 02:03 AM)Eastside Wrote:  

Wonder what this will be.

@Cernovich 3h
"It's not my video, it's someone else's. It's very good. Better than the "hot mic" from last week. #RottenHillary #Debate"

Cuck Luntz :

Pollster Frank Luntz said Donald Trump's performance last night "was so significant that he's back in this race."

"This is the first time of the three debates that there's been any genuine movement," Luntz told Megyn Kelly after the debate, referencing the way undecided voters were impacted by Donald Trump's performance.

"I have to acknowledge something here, I thought it was all over for Donald Trump, and when these people walked in here, I was pretty sure of it," he said.

"Based on their response... I have to change my mind. I actually think that tonight was so significant that he's back in this race."

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=55636

Trump edges closer and closer to the White House after this debate. Great work!

Guess who weighed in about the last night?

Hillary during the debate must have felt like she was in the I know what you did movie:



I mean, here she was, feeling powerless, hounded by a large man who seemed to know every little or big crime she ever committed in her past.

Anyway, internet and D. Trump have changed everything in global politics. Now, no scandal committed by an Establishment person is safe from prying eyes anymore: no leftist will feel safe anymore. Their hideous corrupt past can blow in their face anytime, D. Trump has proven that it is possible to reveal their darkest secrets on TV.