Quote: (04-21-2016 12:08 AM)thedarkknight Wrote:
Quote: (04-20-2016 07:06 AM)The Black Knight Wrote:
I also judge doctors the same way Fast Eddie describes. If they are a woman and/or a minority, the bar is instantly higher for me since I know they got a ton of extra help to move forward in their careers. If I see a white male doc from a legit US school with legit residences, it's pretty much a guarantee he knows his shit and worked his ass off to get to his position. With a woman or minority, there is always the possibility they got a significant bump at every stage since high school not based on merit.
I have to stop you there. That's pretty white supremacist. It's as if you think that it's impossible for a minority to actually have the capability to qualify and perform, as a good doctor. Granted- it may be rarer- but to say a black cannot get there without help is pretty damn racist. If that doesn't portray an entire group of people as inherently inferior, based on race, I do not know what does.
Let me break this down for you:
1. When it comes to my health, I don't fuck around nor care about entertaining being politically correct. I want the best and most competent person; I ultimately don't give a shit about the gender and/or race of the doctor if they meet the aforementioned criteria.
2. In the US educational and professional worlds, minorities and women get preferential treatment in both direct and indirect ways; largely at the expense of white males and in the medical world, asians males to a degree as well. Sometimes by significant amounts. If you dispute this, you are ignorant. This isn't an isolated thing but a long-standing overt legal and culturally acceptable thing to do; to discriminate against white and asian males.
3. Therefore if a minority/woman gets into the following good schools/programs/situations:
-Undergrad
-Medical school
-Residency
-Medical job
It is not an unreasonable assumption to say that he/she got a positive bump in the application process strictly due to race and/or gender. Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that this likely occurred in all four of the aforementioned cases.
4. THAT MEANS in all four of the aforementioned instances, a potential white or asian male got denied/rejected strictly because of their race and/or gender despite having the stronger profile based on the merits.
5. Therefore, a white or asian male that was able to beat the unfair sexist/racist selection standards in all four aforementioned instances likely had such an overwhelming great profile that it would be all but impossible to deny this person. Ultimately, there is a strong probability that this particular individual is a VERY competent/knowledgeable doctor when its all said and done.
Why? Because they played the game for 10-15 years with a constant handicap during the academic/job filtering process and STILL was successful. I don't consider being a minority or woman a justifiable handicap;
I do count non-merit based discrimination as a significant handicap however; which of course falls mostly on white males and to a lesser degree, asian males.
6. And finally: this is why the bar is instantly higher when I initially evaluate the competency of a woman and/or minority.
I have to do it because the academic/job filtering system played favorites and rewarded sub-par people to appease politically correct bullshit. The filtering system actually engaged in both racist and sexist discrimination; particularly towards white and asian males.
And as I alluded to before, I'm not entertaining political correctness when it comes to life and death stuff like medical care. No one should. If you do, you're idiot and you got what's coming to you.
So let me stop you right here and take your
pathetic libtard attempt to shame me by calling me a "white supremacist";
despite your complete ignorance to acknowledge the blatant and overt discrimination against white and asian males in the academic/job filtering process and just say go read this:
And then when you are done reading that, go on and...