"I'm pretty sure there's a lot more to life than being really, really, ridiculously horny. And I plan on finding out what that is. "

---Naughtynom@d

Quote: (02-15-2016 01:44 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

Stay strong, brother.

And let me add, we all share your outrage that they dare to label you with the paedophile label, when you're part of the community which is calling out Salon and others for attempting to normalize it. Again; we - the alleged pro-rape groups - are amongst the alternative media which is calling out the rapes in Europe.

It's absolutely rich how the mainstream media paints us as being rapists and pedos or at least sleazy and sexually unrestrained when they actively celebrate female slutdom and male homosexuality. The later of which has a widespread and actually existing rape culture against young boys.

Is IRT famous now?

When I use to read about the burning of witches in the 1600's, I was like damn that shit is crazy, and there's no way something similar could happen in our times. Oh boy was I wrong!! Now I truly get that the saying whoever controls the present, controls the past. In 60 years we'll be looked at falsely as the Rape era of civilization. I remember when the critics use to call PUA's men who wanted to "trick" women to sleep with them by lying and using lines. But now it's the "Pro rape" argument that you hear right away. Things are getting from Bad to worse

A time to perhaps reflect on Shakespeare's view on Reputation - in the classic Othello -
-------------------

CASSIO
Reputation, reputation, reputation! Oh, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial. My reputation, Iago, my reputation!

IAGO
As I am an honest man, I thought you had received some bodily wound. There is more sense in that than in reputation. Reputation is an idle and most false imposition, oft got without merit and lost without deserving. You have lost no reputation at all unless you repute yourself such a loser. What, man, there are ways to recover the general again. You are but now cast in his mood, a punishment more in policy than in malice, even so as one would beat his offenseless dog to affright an imperious lion. Sue to him again and he’s yours.
-----------------------
Translation:


CASSIO
My reputation, my reputation! I’ve lost my reputation, the longest-living and truest part of myself! Everything else in me is just animal-like. Oh, my reputation, Iago, my reputation!


IAGO
I swear I thought you meant you’d been hurt physically. Your physical health matters more than your reputation. A reputation is a useless and fake quality that others impose on us. You haven’t lost it unless you think you have. There are lots of ways to get on the general’s good side again. You’ve been discharged because he’s angry, and because he’s obliged to do so for policy reasons, not because he dislikes you. He’s got to beat up the weak to frighten the strong. Go to him, petition him. He’ll change his mind.

Sue for libel. We definitely need inhouse lawyers. The media is ramping this thing up.

It may not recover your reputation, but these people need to pay for what they've done as I said before. There was an old Roman maxim that went "pardon one offense and you encourage the commission of many."

That's what's happening, and it explains everything, far beyond this rape culture hysteria.

Those on the "right" side of the narrative are never punished for their actions. So they commit more of them. If they get punished, they might think twice before they try to slander someone else.

I'm already consulting with an attorney.

The reputations are damaged for good. There's no question about that.

However a nice six figure settlement means pounds of flesh that could be used to improve your own sites and brand. You can even spin it as a win against the enemy for your own readership.

Reputation means little when you're the victor in a won war. You get to write history.

The Americans could have cared less what the English thought of them after the revolution. Same thing here.

Edit: @NN keep us informed bud how it turns out. Shame you had to be kicked back here under not so good circumstances.

In Britain there is a law so that if someone sues someone and the prosecutor loses the case, they have to pay all the other side's legal fees. The millionaire newspaper will choose the most expensive lawyers to threaten him from suing. If he sues the newspaper and loses, he can end up in debt and have all his possessions taken by bailiffs. You can't claim bankruptcy for legal fees or money you owe the government. Is it even feasible for him to sue, given the financial risk?

Does he even have much of a case? The 16 year old girl was of legal age (which I believe the newspaper mentioned in the blurry photo) and the newspaper can claim that they never knew How To Stop Rape was satire.

Also another thing that this should make you realize.

Do. Not. Talk. About. Sleeping. With. Girls. Under. 18 (or in "secondary school"). EVER.

Age of consent is just a technicality. In the new world of narrative totalitarianism, it's a crime and you'll be branded with a scarlet letter.

Don't talk about girls under 18. Don't EVER talk about kinky shit you did in the bedroom where you might have been a bit rough with the girl. If you want to post about sexual encounters (and I'd advise against it), give yourself as much plausible deniability as you can.

This might border on self-censorship, but I don't think it's worth the price you might have to pay. It's why I generally don't write about my sexual encounters. There are other, more interesting and more important things to write about.

You have to take into account that we live in the age of the mob. Never allow them even the possibility of having something bad to say about you, because they will inflate it into whatever they want to fit the narrative.

Quote: (02-15-2016 07:30 PM)naughtynomad Wrote:  

I'm already consulting with an attorney.

They should ask for you if they have a case to make $

Didn't you write a story about having sex with a hiv + girl in Africa? How exactly are you worried about your reputation?

I'm wondering now.. Maybe you like the article?

Do you want to ride the rape train to Cashville?

Quote: (02-15-2016 07:34 PM)tynamite Wrote:  

In Britain there is a law so that if someone sues someone and the prosecutor loses the case, they have to pay all the other side's legal fees. The millionaire newspaper will choose the most expensive lawyers to threaten him from suing. If he sues the newspaper and loses, he can end up in debt and have all his possessions taken by bailiffs. You can't claim bankruptcy for legal fees or money you owe the government. Is it even feasible for him to sue, given the financial risk?

Does he even have much of a case? The 16 year old girl was of legal age (which I believe the newspaper mentioned in the blurry photo) and the newspaper can claim that they never knew How To Stop Rape was satire.

This makes me wary. Admittedly, I'm a little worried about poking the beehive. There is so much worse they could write about... drug smuggling, that HIV chick, etc. I'm starting to think it's not worth the risk.

Quote: (02-16-2016 06:13 AM)naughtynomad Wrote:  

Quote: (02-15-2016 07:34 PM)tynamite Wrote:  

In Britain there is a law so that if someone sues someone and the prosecutor loses the case, they have to pay all the other side's legal fees. The millionaire newspaper will choose the most expensive lawyers to threaten him from suing. If he sues the newspaper and loses, he can end up in debt and have all his possessions taken by bailiffs. You can't claim bankruptcy for legal fees or money you owe the government. Is it even feasible for him to sue, given the financial risk?

Does he even have much of a case? The 16 year old girl was of legal age (which I believe the newspaper mentioned in the blurry photo) and the newspaper can claim that they never knew How To Stop Rape was satire.

This makes me wary. Admittedly, I'm a little worried about poking the beehive. There is so much worse they could write about... drug smuggling, that HIV chick, etc. I'm starting to think it's not worth the risk.

That can all happen regardless of what you do here, not suing for damages about the current article won't somehow make them take it easy on you the next time around. In fact, if the writers saw how they got away with smearing you once, they may just completely fabricate something about you then next time around.

I'm not sure what OP's complaint is though. You were already putting out a blog talking about things including banging underage girls, busting inside infected African women, and videos of you banging a burka chick. A blog which you also freely put your face to. And which is available to everyone with a computer in the whole world. That newspaper is only available locally.

Is it just being out of control of the notoriety, or do you now suddenly dislike notoriety?

Might as well come out and tell the world it was all fiction.

Somebody, call Cernovich!

Quote: (02-16-2016 08:01 AM)Gmac Wrote:  

Might as well come out and tell the world it was all fiction.

It won't make a difference, people will believe what they want.


As for suing, I keep seeing everyone say we should sue the media with all the rape-slander, but I don't think anyone understands how courts work.

There are criminal and civil courts.

Lying about someone is not a crime, because it is protected as free-speech. So it does not go to criminal court.

In civil courts, you sue FOR DAMAGES. There must be damage to your income or person. Reputation, as slander, definitely counts.

The problem here, is unless NN has lost his 6-figure job, what exactly is he suing for? If anything his book sales will go up and he is going to make more money. You cannot sue for making more money because there are no damages. Same thing goes for Roosh.

The press KNOWS they cannot be sued in most cases of slander, which is why they do it!

Conversely, if you ran a business of being wholesome (like a Christian business), rape-slander would cost you $$$ and you could easily sue for huge cash.

But in order to sue, DAMAGES NEED TO BE IDENTIFIED. So if people want to stop the rape-slander, we need to identify damages incurred if we want to bring successful suits. I personally cannot see any.

Quote: (02-15-2016 10:57 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

The bottom line is that there is no avoiding politics, either you fight in this world or it will eliminate you.

Spoken like a champion of truth!
One of the biggest poisons affecting us these days is the misguided belief that ignoring an issue will make it magically dissapear,

Well I'm in this fight now whether I like it not. This has seriously affected my family now at home.
There's a lot of shit they could have taken me down for, but a blatant lie?

I fear our enemy is much stronger than we are.

Samseau, that's only true to an extent

I was sued for a million dollars and lost on the basis that she "might" get worse later (girl was injured in a car accident and was in bad shape for a few weeks but made a full recovery. Come court time and they said that "maybe" she could relapse)

Quote: (02-16-2016 08:01 AM)Gmac Wrote:  

Might as well come out and tell the world it was all fiction.

That can keep you out of legal trouble, but no one will actually believe it.

I'd take this one to court. Even if you fail, it will show people (though never everyone) that you were wronged. And the more people take action on this shit the less it will happen.

Quote: (02-16-2016 09:16 AM)Sonoma Wrote:  

Samseau, that's only true to an extent

I was sued for a million dollars and lost on the basis that she "might" get worse later (girl was injured in a car accident and was in bad shape for a few weeks but made a full recovery. Come court time and they said that "maybe" she could relapse)

Sounds like the big-bad evil male narrative fucked you over good.

Even the best lawyers can't do shit if the judges are feminists.

Yet another problem with our broken society today.

However, name a country today in which the judges are fair and just?

Free speech is only free in the united states. Much more restrictive in the uk. Plus there's this whole repealing human rights law thing and creating a bill of rights which i don't like because hmg has made it clear that SJWs are running their outward facing policies.

Here are some details about resolving a complaint and eventually involving an ombudsman:
http://www.presscouncil.ie/making-a-complaint.24.html

I don't know if that even helps you. The most they would do is force the newspaper to publish a correction.

The damage to you is done. The best you can do at this point is make sure the journalist learns his lesson and doesn't pull this shit again on some other guy.

Set up a Go Fund me account. Say it is for "reputation defense/legal" or whatever, just make sure it doesn't violate their terms of use. Use the money to hire a private detective and/or hacker and dig up some dirt on the journalist. Does he cheat on taxes? Is he married and cheating? Does he get sucked off by a tranny a couple times a month? Do coke on the weekends? View twisted fetish or underage pornography?

There is always something. Find it, and expose/publish it in the way that is most harmful to the journalist.