Here's an example of extreme faggotry - what do you guys think of this?:

It's time to do away with the concept of 'manhood' altogether

Quote:Quote:

Men are pretty terrible people. They commit significantly more violent crimes, robberies and assaults each year than women do, according to the Department of Justice. They are more likely to show anger in the workplace and be rewarded for it while women are affected negatively for the same behaviors. They even take up too much space on public transportation when “manspreading”. I could keep going.

Men probably dominate all these “terrible” statistics because, now and throughout history, they’ve dominated the world. But that doesn’t give them a pass. They are still to blame even if they don’t know better, and it’s high time their dominant position – their entitled ignorance – was questioned and dismantled.

There is a “manhood in crisis” trend story to match each one pondering whether women can have it all. But manhood isn’t in crisis; it is the crisis. Still, last week author and activist Kevin Powell published an essay at CNN where he announced, yet again, that manhood is in society’s crosshairs, and recommended a way to fix it.

Powell, who recently released a memoir about his journey to manhood, wrote about spending time on a college campus, working with male college students to find a resolution to the “endless” rape allegations there.

He asked a group of men to name important women in history, which they did, but when pressed on what those women did, the men really couldn’t respond. This lack of actually knowing women’s lives led Powell to the conclusion that if these men couldn’t connect or care to intimately know about women’s lives, they weren’t able to respect them enough not to perpetrate violence against their bodies.

This led him to call for a re-education of men. He argues that men “actually [need to] learn about the contributions of women and girls to every aspect of American society” as a tactic to stop the violence. That is, they need to learn that there is more to women than a reproductive system.

This is theoretically a good next step to stopping the violence that is polluting not just college campuses but the entire world, but it’s very “us and them” rather than “we’re all human together”. It just lets men be more educated about the women they are perpetrating violence against.

Until men en masse consider women to be part of the same ecosystem, masculinity will continue to be primarily a rejection of everything feminine, the tool men use to measure and gauge their own self-worth to other men – the foundation of bro culture. And until then, when they feel that their masculinity is in jeopardy, when they don’t feel man enough, manly violence will seem like a reasonable way to react to their feelings.

“Violence is often the single most evident marker of manhood,” sociologist Michael Kimmel wrote in his 1994 essay Masculinity as Homophobia. “It is the willingness to fight, the desire to fight.”

He is correct. We see this violence from the bar fights over small issues to the violence that breaks out on streets when men are denied by women they catcall.

We’ve seen this recently with the high rate of reported transgender murders in the US – the number sits at 22 so far this year according to the National Anti-Violence Project. Many times, my reporting has shown, these women are murdered not for being transgender, but because their male lovers fear being found out, fear their masculinity being called into question.

All of this was humorously explored in the viral hashtag #MasculinitySoFragile, which through humor showed how men will respond so quickly, even violently, when they feel their manhood is being questioned. Which seems to happen a lot.

Instead of constantly putting manhood under perceived threat, we must rethink the concept entirely, and maybe – to be so daring – throw it out. Because we have centuries of war, of pillaging, of violence that show us that manhood was never in crisis, but always was central to this mayhem. So we may need to just rebuild everything with the whole concept of manhood excluded.

Here's a picture of the author:



I think that says it all

Why is he so concerned with fucking trannies? Their numbers so small as to be insignificant.

Somebody in the comment section destroyed this faggot:

Quote:Quote:

Men are pretty awesome, actually. They've contributed to the advancement of technology, farming techniques, medical knowledge, and are responsible for the current state of the world and its 7 billion inhabitants, most of whom wouldn't be able to exist without these advancements. They're only historically involved in wars because they're physically stronger and don't get pregnant and so are more useful.

Stopped at "Men are pretty terrible people."

I even clicked the link just to confirm that was the opening statement, so you guys don't have to.

Hello anger my old friend
It's good to talk with you again

It's good that the mask has been dropped, so now the public can see the true face of this leftist movement.

Of course they hate masculinity. To be a man means to be striving for something more, it is the Yang principle. These leftists are a different breed, they're nihilists of the worst sort. Having decided that life has no supernatural element, they've jumped to the conclusion that it therefore has no meaning, and all that can be done is to avoid suffering. Their entire philosophy is simply an attempt to crawl back inside the womb from which they came, it appeals to only the most base instincts.

This crowd can't ever be pleased, so it's better to not try at all.

Hey faggot Zach Stafford,

Cut off your male genitalia and join the women and Jenner along with your race baiting SJW's.

Let us men stop working for one day, let alone a week, and see what shit doesn't get done.

Let your "womyn" fight the evil in this world and see how far they get.

Good luck on hating yourself and your own gender so much.

Why not off yourself and have 1 less "man" in this world.


Oh and as I said about removing your genitalia:



Afterall, it's your preference Zach.

That's a lot of words to express self-loathing.

Self-loathing is a form of self-debasement in order to appease women.

To appease women leads to sex in his mind.

When he doesn't get the sex he'll be devastated

The devastation will likely lead to suicide.

Good riddance.

Quote: (10-29-2015 02:21 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

#IStandWithAhmed ...

It's time to do away with journalists like this.

Purge anyone?

This guy needs to go back to singing backup in the Village People.

If we ever need a reminder of "Why We Fight", pull up this puke's article.

It's really strange how coordinated the attack on white men, and men in general too, is in the media while at the same time TPTB are importing huge numbers of people from backwards cultures and poverty stricken areas that really do view women as less than and do actually exist to some degree in a 'rape culture'.

When you really break it down, I find it a bit awe-inspiring just how good men really are. While there are the bad apples, in every group, men, especially white and Asian men seem to be at the top of the hierarchy when it comes to not perpetrating violence against women. Especially considering how much shit is thrown at them by their very own women.

Edit: To be clear, I am speaking mainly from an American point of view.

With reading through the Trump thread and the migrant invasion thread, I am happy that these fags and SJW's are putting their name on shit like this. Once it is on the internet, it is forever.

It can't last forever, nothing does. Sooner or later it will swing back to an equilibrium and it will most decidedly be incredibly violent no matter who ends up on the winning side.

One thought to keep me warm is that who ever wins, fags like this will be the first to lose their head in the new order.

Quote: (10-29-2015 02:21 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

Bro does not appear to lift.

What the fuck did they think people's reaction was going to be when they started tweeting #masculinitysofragile? Today's headline: people react badly to being insulted.

How about we start a #womenarecunts twitter campaign. Then when they get angry we can say 'The angry, sometimes vitriolic response to the #womenarecunts hashtag proves that women are, in fact, cunts.'

It's interesting to note that you only see this kind of crap coming out of male feminists who happen to look like eunuchs and have no capability of being masculine in the first place. There's a real pattern here, that even transcends identity politics:

Fat and ugly feminists think we should do away with beauty standards.
Weedy zit-covered STEM majors think we should do away with women being attracted to athleticism.
Stupid people think we should do away with heavily factoring IQ into judgment of people.
Muslims with morally offensive cultural practices think we should do away with western ethical and legal traditions.

Everybody today wants to wave a magic wand and have society change such that whatever they happen to suck at isn't held against them anymore. It's taking the concept of rejecting prejudice and expanding it to cover everything so no one has to feel like a loser.

Quote: (10-29-2015 06:22 PM)Kristoph Wrote:  

How about we start a #womenarecunts twitter campaign. Then when they get angry we can say 'The angry, sometimes vitriolic response to the #womenarecunts hashtag proves that women are, in fact, cunts.'

Cut right to the heart of the matter:

#FemaleJournalistsAreTheDregsOfWomanhood

Come on, we all know it's true. Look at them. Read to what they type. If you were starting a new and better civilisation what possible function would they serve but as Schismatics trying to undermine it for their own self-glorification?

They're not interested in serving a breeding function. They hate homemaking and the natural world so are no use in houses or farming. They exist on expense account dinners and comped alcohol so they can't cook. They're only of moderate intelligence - though they think they're geniuses - so they're no real use in education, science and technology because they're too dumb to know they're dumb and too arrogant to learn.

All they'll do is expect to sit in air conditioned comfort and try to lower the bar. No room for them on my ark.

Quote: (10-29-2015 02:21 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

Here's a picture of the author:



I think that says it all

LOL, that picture reminds me of the old joke --

Q. What's the hardest part about wearing a cowboy hat?
A. Telling your mom you're gay.

These faggots do my fucking head in, I swear. Men who are against manhood are those who have self-castrated themselves. They are intimidated by masculinity.

This "journalist"'s only statistics, by the way, are cited from queer academics.

It's all fun and games but this faggot's prattle about "rape culture", and that of others like him, is what enables and abets a reality in which a young kid's life is permanently ruined because, as an 18 year old high school senior, he used email to set up a date with a 15 year old high school freshman with whom he later had a consensual sexual encounter. It's a reality in which this kid can be described as a dangerous "predator" by scum prosecutors because he wrote some goofy messages to his friends about pussy -- dangerous enough that he needs to do a year of jail time and register as a sex offender.

So the real matter of fact about that face in the cowboy hat is that this is the face that wields actual power, right here and right now. It has good reasons to smirk.

Quote: (10-29-2015 07:10 PM)Tokyo Joe Wrote:  

Q. What's the hardest part about wearing a cowboy hat?
A. Telling your mom you're gay.

"Men probably dominate all these “terrible” statistics because, now and throughout history, they’ve dominated the world."

Men didn't dominate the world. The created the world. There's a difference.

The commonly-used phrase "male-dominated" connotes that men just sort of moved in. While there's truth in that, there would be no place to move in had men not built it to begin with.

This is yet another liberal, media-spawned perversion of the language. Alter a word and you alter the way people see things. But that doesn't make it the truth.

Add "male-dominated" to my other pet peeve, "single moms," to the growing list of misused media buzzwords. I should compile a list of these phrases and a key to decode them.

Much like most 'bad things' masculinity is an 'evil' but it's a necessary evil. If only it had been included in a book like this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everything...od_for_You

Feminists need to realize that 'masculinity' does have it's faults, but it's benefits far outweigh everything else. That's the whole point of there BEING masculinity. It's also intended to balance out FEMININITY - which - also has it's faults if you think about it (useless for labour etc). When put together though, that's how men and women are able to live in harmony.

Here's what it comes down to: If you kill masculinity - you have to kill femininity too. No guy here wants to see feminine beauty die.

Wish I had come up with this beautiful comment - best one so far:


Most of the men in this article seem to be made of straw.

Urgh. Fuck this guy. His face practically screams "I am a doormat".