rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)
#51

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote:Quote:

That's a very homophobic post by the way. How do you think that's going to make the bisexuals and homosexuals feel when they read that?

[Image: jordan.gif]
Reply
#52

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 09:55 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

Read the stuff 2Wyked posted and keep studying more. If you really want to debate stuff like this, you are required to present alot more of an argument than this. The more details you flesh out of the position you are attempting to make, the more you will realize you are arguing from a losing position, but it is best to make you do the work first.

You are a college student. Get to work. Give me an outline. Opening argument, premise, facts to support premise, then conclusion.

Don't argue with grown ass men if you are not willing to write like one.

You are trying everyone's patience and it will be time for some tough love soon.
You are an honourable man TK.

However, I think the consensus is that a female is posting as McCoy, not a man who could understand concepts like honour, respect, rational discourse etc..

It is a lot to expect of a woman, to debate rationally and objectively. It involves proper consideration of opposing views, something that I believe increases our knowledge and understanding.

Can't see it happening with the OP in this thread.
Reply
#53

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

I vote that McCoys user name be changed to "L M McCoy's Mom".
Reply
#54

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Enough of this faggotery

[Image: stop-hammer-time-o.gif]
Reply
#55

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

"Account's still active, fuck it"

[Image: attachment.jpg26277]   
Reply
#56

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 11:31 AM)FrenchCanadian Wrote:  

Enough of this faggotery

[Image: stop-hammer-time-o.gif]

I would like to see more as long as its contained to this thread

[Image: bruce_come_at_me.gif]

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
Reply
#57

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

I'm reiterating my speculation that he knocked the girl up that he was proud of raw dogging.

This is her now. She has him by the balls, access to his RVF, likely his bank account too.

Time to mount a "free the real McCoy" campaign.
Reply
#58

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Roosh, can you change his handle to "McCoy's Mother"?

Take care of those titties for me.
Reply
#59

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Mrs. McCoy, this is what men did for their rights and your safety during 1917-1922.

[Image: 5783140-3x2-700x467.jpg]

[Image: PA-1137018.jpg]

[Image: 0309rats.jpg]

Meanwhile... fully clothed, fed, comfortable and ungrateful.

[Image: 5389-full.jpg]

Instead of paying for your slut pills, my tax money should go to healing the veterans instead.

Now, tits with "Pontifex" written on them or gtfo.
Reply
#60

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-10-2015 05:32 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

I hope everyone's opinions towards women here haven't effected their relationships with their mothers.

Heh. My Mum is a compulsive liar with narcissistic personality disorder.

I'm not saying that to criticise her, it's just the unfortunate truth. Nothing I've learned from here has influenced my relationship with her - I still love the crazy old Mistress of Deceit - but she did inadvertently teach me a lot about women.

Because a lot of them are mentally ill, or at least tend that way.

But I digress...

Quote:Quote:

This segment will cover the time period from 1848-1920. There will be multiple segments and I will start off slowly so I don't bombard you with too much information [Image: smile.gif]

please be respectful as I have taken time out of my busy day to do this-thanks! If you disagree do so politely and please state why.

http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and...ns-Rights/

please copy the URL above, read the article, and discuss [Image: smile.gif]

OK.

Quote:Quote:

The first gathering devoted to women’s rights in the United States was held July 19–20, 1848, in Seneca Falls, New York. The principal organizers of the Seneca Falls Convention were Elizabeth Cady Stanton, a mother of four from upstate New York, and the Quaker abolitionist Lucretia Mott.1 About 100 people attended the convention; two-thirds were women.

Bitter old hags, religious nutters, and Victorian-eta manginas.

[Image: il_570x_N_623730230_f3p7.jpg]
"Let's pass a law against calling me fat!"

Quote:Quote:

Stanton drafted a “Declaration of Sentiments, Grievances, and Resolutions,” that echoed the preamble of the Declaration of Independence: “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal.”

So it was based on a lie from the start. Men and women aren't created equal. Never have been, never will be. Not only that, but it makes no sense to claim otherwise.

You might as well claim dandelions are equal to cheese. It's not just wrong, there is literally no information content to the sentence. If I said "it's raining gold coins outside", that is a falsifiable statement which is either true or false. Claiming men and women are "created equal" is a meaningless political sentiment.

Quote:Quote:

Susan B. Anthony and Ida H. Harper cowrote, “In the indifference, the inertia, the apathy of women, lies the greatest obstacle to their enfranchisement.” Historian Nancy Woloch described early suffragists’ efforts as “a crusade in political education by women and for women, and for most of its existence, a crusade in search of a constituency.”

So from its earliest days, the vast majority of women - normal, healthy women - wanted nothing to do with feminism. It was the creepy and the kooky, the proto-cat ladies and manjawed harridans, who were obsessed with voting.

[Image: suffragewants.jpg]

Quote:Quote:

NAWSA publicly embraced the war cause, despite the fact that many women suffragists, including Rankin, were pacifists. Suffrage leaders suggested that the effort to “make the world safe for democracy” ought to begin at home, by extending the franchise. Moreover, they insisted, the failure to extend the vote to women might impede their participation in the war effort

So much for the idea that, if women ran the world, there would be no war. Of course, women have always been easy to herd into supporting wars. From the women who shamed young men into joining up for the slaughter in Verdun and the Somme, to Hitler's fanatical female followers, to the lunatics of the US State department who thought they could export feminism to Afghanistan, women have rarely been anti-war as a sex.

[Image: Sudeten_German_women_welcome_Hitler.gif]
Every woman adores a fascist

Quote:Quote:

to the consternation of feminist reformers, they did not vote independently; instead, their voting preferences tended to mirror those of the men in their families.

Feminists have never understood normal women. How could they? Normal women want masculine leadership.

Anyway, when are you going to release the real McCoy?

[Image: trunk.jpg]
Reply
#61

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

All I can say is that I hope this really is a woman posting under McCoy's name. That I can wrap my mind around.

Because if this is actually a man writing this bilge, then it's a disturbing reminder to me of how bad things have gotten...
Reply
#62

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

I'm going to rep McCoy's Mom just so she keeps posting gems like this.

[Image: kermit.gif]

"Feminism is a trade union for ugly women"- Peregrine
Reply
#63

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?
Reply
#64

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 12:55 PM)FuckTheDecline Wrote:  

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?

Perpetual 7 day bans seem more fun to me and suitable for his transgressions [Image: blush.gif]
Reply
#65

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

The entire writing style of this new McCoy is way different compared to his other posts.

I think we can all assume it's officially a woman (mother or GF) whose taken over his account and trying to give us a "history lesson"

I agree we should change his username to L M McCoys Mom
Reply
#66

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Still waiting for you to respond to my first post love!


[Image: 3aT1pkj.gif]


[Image: ea9.gif]


[Image: 0c1.gif]


[Image: IBVdCTo.gif]


[Image: tol5g.gif]

I've never typed "faggot" into Google search more in my life, honest!

You don't get there till you get there
Reply
#67

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 01:53 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

I've never typed "faggot" into Google search more in my life, honest!

[Image: jennifer-lawrence-10.gif]

[Image: smile.gif] [Image: smile.gif] [Image: smile.gif] [Image: smile.gif] [Image: smile.gif]
Reply
#68

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-10-2015 07:09 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  

Actually, you could use the search feature and see that I've have already started many threads on this topic of women in America from 1848 to 1920:

The Roots Of Feminism In America

The Seneca Falls Convention: Understanding The Roots Of Entitled White Feminism

Prohibition In America: Women & Authoritarianism

The Gilded Age: “New Women,” Gibson Girls & The Rumblings Of Feminism

Ibsen's "A Doll House" & The False Assumptions Of Masculinity (A highly controversial play written around 1870 that is considered the most feminist work)

A Portrait Of The Naughty Flapper Girl Of The 1920's

Class is in session, bro
I remember reading the one in the second link and I instantly thought white women and black men interaction is slightly disturbing. Even Frederick marry one despite his opposition to the white women disproving the two Amendments. His obversation show white women actually live a good life. And this repeat itself such as the Civil Rights movement open up feminist and how now Hilary Clinton is running right after Obama.
Reply
#69

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 03:48 AM)L M McCoy Wrote:  

Quote: (05-11-2015 03:08 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  

You want statistics on why hot young girls get more attention than fat and old women? LOL OKAY!

[Image: 962.jpg]


[Image: 667.gif]


[Image: d2a.gif]


[Image: fa3.gif]

Everyone has their preferences like I told your friend. If you want to vain then by all means go right ahead. Just don't cry about it if someone acts the same way towards you

That's a very homophobic post by the way. How do you think that's going to make the bisexuals and homosexuals feel when they read that?

Wait, what about the trans community?! What about how they feel? By leaving them out, did you just unwittingly show you were transphobic?!

How could you be so cruel? You just displayed your hatred by omission. How insensitive. Think about those little boys with lesbian parents looking to slice off his wee-wee and dress him in a dress.

How do you think s/he feels?!

Seven-day ban!! Ten-day ban!!! Ten-thousand-day ban!!!
Reply
#70

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 01:03 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

Quote: (05-11-2015 12:55 PM)FuckTheDecline Wrote:  

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?

Perpetual 7 day bans seem more fun to me and suitable for his transgressions [Image: blush.gif]

Not only that, but L M McCoy started this whole thing because he wanted to be banned, meaning he didn't have the self-control to simply stop posting and walk away quietly. So he asked to be banned. Not giving him what he wants is funnier than giving him what he wants.

Furthermore, FuckTheDecline, if you're really aggravated by McCoy's posts in this thread, then just stop reading them. Show more discipline and self-control than McCoy ever had; be the better man. [Image: smile.gif]

----------------------

Edited to add: I cannot read this thread without getting this song stuck in my head.






Before joining RVF, I didn't think it was possible for a man to have that deep-sounding, alpha voice at 52-seconds in. But now I wonder which RVF member is that guy.

AnonymousBosch, I'm looking in your general direction...
Reply
#71

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 12:55 PM)FuckTheDecline Wrote:  

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?

We don't use textspeak on this forum.

Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#72

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 12:55 PM)FuckTheDecline Wrote:  

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?

I am the real mccoy
Reply
#73

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Quote: (05-11-2015 01:03 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:  

Quote: (05-11-2015 12:55 PM)FuckTheDecline Wrote:  

This is clearly a woman and personally i don't care how many posts that profile has, this is supposed to be only male zone. Also, engaging with clearly females on this forum is grounds for being banned? So i ask for Roosh or Tuth to get rid of this profile, the real mccoy can always start a new account.

I don't wanna be a downer. This forum is my only male space, that's why i want this bitch banned. With regards to the real Mccoy he deserves some kind of punishment for letting a woman get hold of his account, banning his profile and making him start a new one is fair, no?

Perpetual 7 day bans seem more fun to me and suitable for his transgressions [Image: blush.gif]

no I like it here [Image: smile.gif]
Reply
#74

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

Tell us the story then, how did you get into his account?
Reply
#75

First segment on the women's rights movement (1848-1920)

I'd say this pretty much sums up modern Feminism.










You don't get there till you get there
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)