We need money to stay online, if you like the forum, donate! x

rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one. x


Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade
#1

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

From today's NY Times:

Quote:Quote:

Obesity Rate for Young Children Plummets 43% in a Decade
By SABRINA TAVERNISEFEB. 25, 2014

Oumou Balde, 4, playing with her teacher, Jacqualine Sanchez, and some pretend food in a pre-kindergarten class at the Sheltering Arms Learning Center in New York. A new federal study says the obesity rate among 2- to 5-year-old children has dropped significantly since 2004.

Federal health authorities on Tuesday reported a stunning 43 percent drop in the obesity rate among 2- to 5-year-old children over the past decade, the first broad decline in an epidemic that often leads to lifelong struggles with weight and higher risks for cancer, heart disease and stroke.

The drop emerged from a major federal health survey that experts say is the gold standard for evidence on what Americans weigh. The trend came as a welcome surprise to researchers. New evidence has shown that obesity takes hold young: Children who are overweight or obese between age 3 and 5 are five times as likely to be overweight or obese as adults.

A smattering of states have reported modest progress in reducing childhood obesity in recent years, and last year federal authorities noted a slight decline in the obesity rate among low-income children. But the figures on Tuesday showed a sharp fall in obesity rates among all 2- to 5-year-olds, offering the first clear evidence that America’s youngest children have turned a corner in the obesity epidemic. About 8 percent of 2- to 5-year-olds were obese in 2012, down from 14 percent in 2004.

“This is the first time we’ve seen any indication of any significant decrease in any group,” said Cynthia Ogden, a researcher for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the author of the report, which will be published in JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, on Wednesday. “It was exciting.”

She cautioned that these very young children make up a tiny fraction of the American population and that the figures for the broader society had remained flat, and that for women over 60, the obesity rate had even increased. Still, the lower obesity rates in the very young bode well for the future, she said.

Experts point to several possible explanations for the fall, but say a full understanding remains elusive. Children now consume fewer calories from sugary beverages than they did in 1999. More women are breast-feeding, which can lead to a healthier range of weight gain for young children. Federal researchers have also chronicled a drop in overall calories for children in the past decade, down by 7 percent for boys and 4 percent for girls, but health experts said those declines were too small to make much difference.

Another explanation is that some combination of state, local and federal policies aimed at reducing obesity is starting to have an effect. Michelle Obama has led a push to change young children’s eating and exercise habits and 10,000 child care centers across the country have signed on. Many scientists doubt that anti-obesity programs actually work, but proponents of the programs say a broad set of policies applied systematically over a period of time can affect behavior.

The news announcement from the C.D.C. included a remark from Mrs. Obama: “I am thrilled at the progress we’ve made over the last few years in obesity rates among our youngest Americans.”

I'm hesitant to be optimistic about this, but we may be turning a corner in the obesity epidemic. This is not the first sign we've seen that obesity in America may be reaching a plateau (although this is the first data I've seen showing an outright decline in the obesity rate in any age group). Another strong reason for optimism is that as healthcare costs continue to strain the government's finances, there will be increasing pressure to adopt strong anti-obesity public health measures that can actually work (i.e. taxes and subsidies that punish rather than promote unhealthy lifestyles, not feel-good promotional campaigns).

In 15 years' time the new generation of sluts will begin to reverse the horrifying tide of land whales that has polluted the dating pool and enabled so many of our society's ills--hot-girl bitchiness, mass sausagefests, out-of-control female entitlement, crippling healthcare costs.

This is just one piece of information, but if this trend continues, in another generation we may be led out of the wilderness and into a second golden age of younger, hotter, tighter American poon. What do you think, will you be regaling the out-of-wedlock child you had because you raw-dogged one too many skanks with tales of the horrors of the mid 2000s-2010s dating scene, grateful that those dark days are gone?
Reply
#2

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

I'm looking forward to dating 18 yr olds in 15 years.

I'm the King of Beijing!
Reply
#3

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Is great news if true, but I suspect statistical slight of hand. In other words they have likely changed the definition of obese, the method of collecting data, the places they collect the data from or something similar in order to get the lower numbers. As much as I'd like it to be true I just don't see something as fundamental as eating habits changing this much this fast. At least in the absence of an actual war and or famine. The introduction of a revolutionary anti-obesity drug would also be a valid reason, but I have not heard of one at all, much less one authorised for use on very young children.

The fact that the numbers are being used politically (Mrs Obama's involvement), means that they will need to be analysed by health and statistical experts from a non-government body (i.e. not the CDC) before they can be taken seriously. A peer reviewed paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine or The Lancet would do.
Reply
#4

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Without a study to back up my own observations I am spitballing.

It has dropped significantly in my area. One of my girls is a pre school teacher and they hammer on the parents daily about proper nutrition and exercise.

I volunteer with YMCA Strong Kids and see nothing but ingrained activity in the kids and parents lives.

I saw the change here about three years ago. I told myself and close friends that it was the tipping point. That we are now on the obesity clean up period. No longer having to bear witness to fat kids who never stood a chance.

Lets hope I am right.
Reply
#5

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Quote: (02-26-2014 12:51 PM)Bad Hussar Wrote:  

Is great news if true, but I suspect statistical slight of hand. In other words they have likely changed the definition of obese, the method of collecting data, the places they collect the data from or something similar in order to get the lower numbers. As much as I'd like it to be true I just don't see something as fundamental as eating habits changing this much this fast. At least in the absence of an actual war and or famine. The introduction of a revolutionary anti-obesity drug would also be a valid reason, but I have not heard of one at all, much less one authorised for use on very young children.

The fact that the numbers are being used politically (Mrs Obama's involvement), means that they will need to be analysed by health and statistical experts from a non-government body (i.e. not the CDC) before they can be taken seriously. A peer reviewed paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine or The Lancet would do.

It's going to be published in JAMA per the OP.

I haven't looked at this particular study very closely but I think it's generally legit and done very carefully. It's very unlikely that this result is simply due to a statistical sleight of hand or a change in definitions. Note that they only found the drop in this particular age group (2-5) while the rate in other age groups has remained flat.

While it's hard to say for sure, I think it's quite likely that in this case the study is fine and the results are real. If it's an artifact of some kind, it would be something that's not very obvious (not something as simple as them having changed the definition and then neglected to adjust for it).

same old shit, sixes and sevens Shaft...
Reply
#6

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Quote: (02-26-2014 09:23 AM)Suits Wrote:  

I'm looking forward to dating 18 yr olds in 15 years.

Yeah I'll be in my mid 30s by then.
Reply
#7

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Quote: (02-26-2014 01:24 PM)Laner Wrote:  

Without a study to back up my own observations I am spitballing.

It has dropped significantly in my area. One of my girls is a pre school teacher and they hammer on the parents daily about proper nutrition and exercise.

I volunteer with YMCA Strong Kids and see nothing but ingrained activity in the kids and parents lives.

I saw the change here about three years ago. I told myself and close friends that it was the tipping point. That we are now on the obesity clean up period. No longer having to bear witness to fat kids who never stood a chance.

Lets hope I am right.

Well, that certainly gives one hope. I seem to remember you are in Vancouver Laner. Is that right? Vancouver is a bit of an outlier, in that the population is much more interested in health, fitness, exercise and the outdoors than the Canadian average. When living there for many years (downtown) about the only time I'd even notice fat people in the streets was during cruise season around Canada Place and surrounds. This is where the cruises to Alaska leave from - with mostly non-Vancouver and in fact non-Canadian passengers. Among the local population overweight/obesity would be a social stigma, especially among girls. No "fat-acceptance" would get any traction there. Certainly not among heterosexual women at any rate. Maybe there'd be a march on Commercial Drive, but those woman aren't in the pool anyway.

But you are talking about a change over time in one place and therefore valid. Hopefully the tide is indeed turning.
Reply
#8

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

I can believe this. Young parents today are much more aware of how bad sugar is (and too many carbs generally, but especially sugar).

I predict the obesity gap between men and women will grow larger as fewer boys get started on the wrong foot. But women will have the same imperatives that draw them to food, and will have more so as society grows increasingly dysfunctional. After all, every woman who sits down to a tub of ice cream knows it's not good for her and will make her fat, but logic cannot compete with her emotional imperative for comfort.
Reply
#9

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Not only is awareness up, but incomes have been flat or down for most families in the last 5 years. Buying a pizza with a 2 Liter of Coke or Pepsi twice a week is no longer economically possible for many middle and lower middle class families.
Reply
#10

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Quote: (02-26-2014 02:43 PM)Bad Hussar Wrote:  

Quote: (02-26-2014 01:24 PM)Laner Wrote:  

Without a study to back up my own observations I am spitballing.

It has dropped significantly in my area. One of my girls is a pre school teacher and they hammer on the parents daily about proper nutrition and exercise.

I volunteer with YMCA Strong Kids and see nothing but ingrained activity in the kids and parents lives.

I saw the change here about three years ago. I told myself and close friends that it was the tipping point. That we are now on the obesity clean up period. No longer having to bear witness to fat kids who never stood a chance.

Lets hope I am right.

Well, that certainly gives one hope. I seem to remember you are in Vancouver Laner. Is that right? Vancouver is a bit of an outlier, in that the population is much more interested in health, fitness, exercise and the outdoors than the Canadian average. When living there for many years (downtown) about the only time I'd even notice fat people in the streets was during cruise season around Canada Place and surrounds. This is where the cruises to Alaska leave from - with mostly non-Vancouver and in fact non-Canadian passengers. Among the local population overweight/obesity would be a social stigma, especially among girls. No "fat-acceptance" would get any traction there. Certainly not among heterosexual women at any rate. Maybe there'd be a march on Commercial Drive, but those woman aren't in the pool anyway.

But you are talking about a change over time in one place and therefore valid. Hopefully the tide is indeed turning.

I would say many parts of Vancouver are changing. Even Commercial Drive, for all its freaky outcasts, at least many of them are health conscious and while not athletic, they are not obese either.

You are right about the Cruise Ship season though, which is great. Plant a bunch of morbidly obese tourists into the center of one of the healthiest and best looking populations in the world and see them squirm. Many of them just stand there mouth breathing and wide eyed as locals glide along in high heels and slim cut suits. Fat Shaming at its root.

Its not even a question of whether someone works out here. I am sure you remember how people would brag about hikes and such. Well that is not even good enough. Now there needs to be actual fitness and strength. I posted a while back about the Asian women being the ones having to watch their weight now. It used to be white girls, but now most white women are athletic and the Asians are soft. They are now hitting the gym in record numbers and I am blown away at what a squat rack can do for Asian girls.

The tide has certainly turned, and I will continue to support the causes.
Reply
#11

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

I didn't have the patience to actually go through the details but Gucci Little Piggy did.

This gist is that childhood obesity in 2003 was at 13.9%, and in 2012 it was at 8.4%, an improvement for sure but less so than the 43% figure would have you believe.

Also,
Quote:Quote:

In 2003-2004, 17.1 percent of people 2 to 19 years old were obese. That number reached a low of 15.4 percent in 2005-2006 before jumping back up to 16.9 percent in 2011-2012.
...
Obesity rates for children age 6 to 11 years went: 18.8% in 2003-2004, 15.1% in 2005-2006, 19.6% in 2007-2008, 18.0% in 2009-2010, and 17.7% in 2011-2012.
Reply
#12

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Quote: (02-28-2014 12:35 PM)MattW Wrote:  

I didn't have the patience to actually go through the details but Gucci Little Piggy did.

This gist is that childhood obesity in 2003 was at 13.9%, and in 2012 it was at 8.4%, an improvement for sure but less so than the 43% figure would have you believe.

But not a lot less.

8.4% is 60% of 13.9%, which means a relative reduction of 40%.

But the reduction in obesity as measured against the whole population is 5.5%.
Reply
#13

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

Thank god!

[Image: praying-gopher1.jpg]

Contributor at Return of Kings.  I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.

Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
Reply
#14

Obesity rate for young children down 43% in the last decade

I remember reading a few reports on the stagnation of the obesity epidemic last year (rates stopped increasing). This is the first genuine decline I've seen reported nationally.

As I said before, I really believe we've seen the worst of the obesity epidemic. The situation is about as bad as it is going to get. We've seen rock bottom.

The question now is about how much improvement we might see from here. This study is reporting a decrease, but will that continue? I think there is reason for cautious optimism here, but time will tell.

Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)