[kimleebj]

I don't want to hurt or out anybody. But a woman with no pictures in her online profile bragged about being thin, pretty, and honest. When she sent me pics, I was floored. If she had claimed to be average then I would probably have met her. But I became irate at the hypocrisy and deception.

I texted that she was not thin, and she was insulted. She claims a certain weight, and must be lying. She is 5'1" or 5'2". Guess her weight (pic attached).

Roosh has posted a few hostile essays where he berated women for standing next to him or stealing his drink. I never understood his point before. But I'm starting to relate. It's not a strategem. It's just at some point, you lose patience with liars, flakes, rudeness, etc. I just hope to exorcise my anger appropriately so I don't repel the genuinely nice and attractive women.

[MiXX]

She did not completely lie; at least she did not tell you she was a tight, sweet-smelling 18 year old freshman in college

this why I tell guys to get girls on webcam they meet online BEFORE a face-to-face meetup. Just about every smartphone and laptop out there has a webcam now, so no excuses why she cannot see you in webcam unless she lives in some remote African/FSU country you cannot pronounce.

I would guess she is about 150lbs (70kgs). If she was 5'9 (without shoes), that would be thin, but not at 5'1. She looks to be about 45 years old too based on her bad skin tone from years of unprotected UV exposure, and flabby arms.


Mixx

[jmoney29]

I'll guess 150 considering that she's 5'1-5'2. It's good that you took a stand on it, or you could have soon been messing with whales who are "Average" in no time. By the way, how old is she? I would guess 35-40.

[Mikev75]

I agree with the 150 pounds guesses. What weight did she claim? Also curious about her age. Her skin is very sun damaged. Be glad she didn't send an ultra flattering photo of herself which didn't showcase her flabby arms and abdomen. Then you'd have wasted more time.

[Timoteo]

Your annoyance is completely justified. She did lie. We all know what THIN means, so she can't claim that you simply have a different idea of what thin is. I generally don't accept friend requests or any communication from someone that doesn't post pictures, or has pics of flowers or landscapes or some other placeholder. Chicks want attention, so if they're hiding, that means there's something they're ashamed of. On the rare occasions that I've accepted a request from someone with no pics, I've ALWAYS been disappointed. Fatties are notorious for doing this, or they'll post caracatures of fatties, as a way of letting you know they're fat. I actually have more respect for the fatties that defiantly put it out there: "I'm a BBW, and if you can't handle that pass by my profile." Others will chat you up, and let you "get to know them" with the hopes that once they reveal their true selves, you will already like them so much that their weight won't matter. WRONG.

I applaud you for calling her out. Most guys wouldn't have done that. She's not a total beast, but she's sloppy from the looks of that thick middle. If a girl is pretty, she'll get a dude or two to step up. One of women's biggest beefs on line is that guys lie, yet they're quick to pull something like this. The other is posting their thin pics, which were taken 30 pounds ago. This chick has big titties, and if she tightened up she'd be highly smashable. She can play the weight game with you, but what the scale says isn't the issue. It's what your eyes tell you. And your eyes tell you that she's sloppy.

[el mechanico]

With that loose flab "motherly arms" and at 5'1 I would put her at about 125 remember that fat weighs less than muscle which she has none of. There's another crime here though. Her clothes and accessories. Even her watch is crap and what's the deal with that shirt?
Take a look at her pants. A prelude to a flat ass.

[kimleebj]

(01-06-2012 11:32 AM)Timoteo Wrote:  

what the scale says isn't the issue.

Her age and skin are not an issue. The weight is an issue, because her profile proclaimed her to be "thin" and "honest" and she later claimed to be under 100 pounds! She might be deluded and have obese American girlfriends who tell her she is thin. But she has not stepped on a scale that measured under 100. That is a flat-out lie. Perhaps she feels justified in lying, rationalizing that at one time she weighed under 100 (we all did) and that I deserving a stinging rebuke for insulting her.

Well, I don't think there is much upside here. It is interesting she continued to message me to get the last word. Hopefully she will be more modest and considerate, and I will retain a backbone with no bitterness.

[el mechanico]

(01-06-2012 11:55 AM)kimleebj Wrote:  

(01-06-2012 11:32 AM)Timoteo Wrote:  

what the scale says isn't the issue.

Her age and skin are not an issue. The weight is an issue, because her profile proclaimed her to be "thin" and "honest" and she later claimed to be under 100 pounds! She might be deluded and have obese American girlfriends who tell her she is thin. But she has not stepped on a scale that measured under 100. That is a flat-out lie. Perhaps she feels justified in lying, rationalizing that at one time she weighed under 100 (we all did) and that I deserving a stinging rebuke for insulting her.

Well, I don't think there is much upside here. It is interesting she continued to message me to get the last word. Hopefully she will be more modest and considerate, and I will retain a backbone with no bitterness.

Send her that "How single are you today?" Text

[UgSlayer]

GO IN ON THE BITCH. DO IT FOR US! If you let her know you will not be seeing her because of her weight, and the fact that she lied about it, she might start the process of losing the weight. Every little effort counts. What kind of repercussions could there be? I'm not on any online dating sites, so I wouldn't know if there was a rating system with people you correspond with.

oh...and 160.

[Tuthmosis]

I've gone out with a lot of girls in that height range and can say--without a shadow of a doubt--that she's not 125. She definitely in the 145-155 range. No doubt. She has a significant pooch and flabby shoulders and arms. If we could see her face, I'm sure we'd see some accumulated weight there too. You know the worst part: she probably has no ass, too.

Secret fatties are the worst. Since I added the online thing to my repertoire, one or two of them have slipped through my sophisticated advance-warning systems. One of them used old pictures of herself (she was young as it was) and it was really sad to see what a mere 20 extra clicks will do to a pretty hot girl.

[Brian]

150 seems high considering she's not tall and not muscular. i'd guess 130ish. as ugly as those flabby arms and gut are they're not that dense/heavy

[SVK]

My guess would be around 140 lbs for that height. That would correspond to BMI of about 26 - overweight, but not nearly obese yet.
And - maybe when she said she is under 100, she meant 100 kg (220 lbs), that would be true...

[el mechanico]

This chick here at 166 then down to 135 at 5'4
[attachment=3995]
So no way the fashion queen weighs over 130

I've been working on her myself online to find out but she won't message me back. Kimlee, you should stop giving her a hard time for lying and get her ass over. Put a scale in your threshold and carry her into your place stepping on the scale you have hidden behind the door.

[Chad Daring]

"Guess the weight"

To much.

[BortimusPrime]

Heh, the way you blurred her face in photoshop makes it look like she's got a snout.

[Goldin Boy]

I'm guessing about 145-155. No way in hell that's thin for being 5'1. Also a woman on a social networking or dating site with no pix would've been a red flag to me: Imo, most women know guys talk to them based on their physical attractiveness. Most girls love to post tons of pix of themselves to get sycophantic comments from beta orbiters. A girl with 0 flicks is hiding something, in this case that beer belly.