[Baron De Cyr]

Solid article on how homosexual identity is not only a tool of global capitalism, but also one of colonization directed against non-westerners.

Globo-Homo

http://theagonist.org/essays/2019/04/15/...pital.html

[infowarrior1]

Globo-homo. Making the world safe for sodomy.

[partyfowl]

Now 12% of America is gay, it is literally the gayest place in the world.

[PharaohRa]

As I mentioned in a past post, there is a reason why the Indo-European tribes threw homosexuals in the bog!

[Gimlet]

Dope editorial, highly educational. This is a must read, far more intellectual than I thought from the thread title.

[godfather dust]

(05-07-2019 05:34 PM)PharaohRa Wrote:  

As I mentioned in a past post, there is a reason why the Indo-European tribes threw homosexuals in the bog!

My preferred way to deal with homosexuality would be somewhere between the Iranian method and the American way (letting them marry and adopt rape victims.) Closer to the Iranians however.

I guess ultimately I would like a ban on open homosexuality (with punishment) but not go so far as to perform raids on people being gay quietly, provided no children are involved in any way (if gays had children in the house, even under pretences like "baking cookies" I would be in favor of imprisonment.)

A few years ago I wouldn't be so severe, but it's become clear a big part of the gay agenda and lifestyle is the corruption and victimization of children.

[Easy_C]

The Russian way should be sufficient

[godfather dust]

(05-07-2019 08:10 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

The Russian way should be sufficient

Yes they seem to do it pretty well.

[911]

(05-07-2019 06:55 PM)Gimlet Wrote:  

Dope editorial, highly educational. This is a must read, far more intellectual than I thought from the thread title.

Yes indeed, it's got a lot of depth, a lot of parallels with E. Michael Jones' take on this subject, summarized in this short video I've linked before:

Quote:

Posted by partyfowl - Today 03:58 PM
Now 12% of America is gay, it is literally the gayest place in the world.

It's more like 4%-5%, tops. Even San Francisco, the gayest big city on earth, only has 15% homos. For the broader SF Bay Area, it's only 6%, so this gives you an upper bound for the country.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

^^^^^^

The oligarchs referenced in the above video did far more damage to the family by pushing for women to go to college and become part of the workforce.

Gays are about 2 percent of the populace. Women are over 50 percent. Men can ignore the pride parades. But most can't ignore women. Feminism was far more damaging. Some of you at this point might be saying "But wait! Those gay TV shows and the hookup/porn culture they spawned influence women disproportionately!"

To which I say: "Had all these women been married with three kids -- like my mother was by age 29 -- they would not be watching these shows. In fact, these shows would not be on the air because when married women with kids had a big influence on society, it was far more conservative. Shows like 'The Brady Bunch' made up prime time."

Cuckservatives are now raising their girls as boys. They're making their daughters into jocks, then putting them on the "husband track" to be top earners.

Who backed this? The corporations who wanted to break the family so they could get twice the workers at half the pay. The above video alludes to corporations not wanting to give raises to men with families. It should go onto say that that could also be accomplished by creating a society of unmarried people.

The "globohomo" corporations should be called "globofeminist" corporations because they're behind this big push. And they were pushing for this long before gay marriage.

(It's also instructive to note that gay culture didn't take center stage in America until early '70s feminists pushed lesbianism as a lifestyle and an alternative to marriage. This opened the door to what came later.)

The next time you balk at seeing a pride parade or two men kissing on your TV screen, hold your emotions. And instead think that if all the American women you know had become moms instead of workerbees, you wouldn't be seeing that on TV at all. You'd be seeing shows like "Family Ties" again.

[Leonard D Neubache]

I'm not going to hold my revulsion, and I'm happy to call it the globohomo regime because there's no face of feminism that elicits immediate gut revulsion to the same degree as two men kissing.

Women working and voting is done. It's a fact. It's never going to change this side of a collapse and/or revolution.

Globohomo faggotry is a battleground that the normies are still up for grabs in.

Fight today's fights. Not the ones we already lost decades ago.

[VNvet]

(05-07-2019 09:51 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

The next time you balk at seeing a pride parade or two men kissing on your TV screen, hold your emotions. And instead think that if all the American women you know had become moms instead of workerbees, you wouldn't be seeing that on TV at all. You'd be seeing shows like "Family Ties" again.

What good does this do?

Protesting a sodomy parade does 10,000 times more damage than thinking about a feminist being a mom.

(05-07-2019 09:51 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

Who backed this? The corporations who wanted to break the family so they could get twice the workers at half the pay. The above video alludes to corporations not wanting to give raises to men with families. It should go onto say that that could also be accomplished by creating a society of unmarried people.

Reducing wages wasn't the end goal. These people control the central banks and literally print money. They don't care about paying less money.

The whole money theory reeks of an allowed opposition conspiracy theory that Alex Jones or Joe Rogan would push. Or even the approved anti-feminist guys.

There is something much more sinister with the feminism/sodomy programming than saving some money. It's probably satanic of some sort judging by how much the oligarchs love this weird occult stuff. Frankly, we wouldn't be seeing the glorification of trannies, child ones at that, if it was only about money.

I hate to be that guy that quotes pop culture. However, the famous line by Alfred in Dark Knight fits the situation too well.

"Some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.”

[911]

You're right VNvet, it wasn't just about the money. It was about controlling and changing society.

First when women work, they get taxed and fleeced by the government, which gives it more tools to control and reshape society.

The second goal of feminism and women working is to weaken the family, as kids will now be raised by pre-K and K-12 system, with the influence of family on their upbringing weakened.

Those are the two reasons put forth by Aaron Russo, a successful 1980s/90s film producer (most notably Trading Places, one of the best American comedies of all time). Russo was befriended by the Rockefellers as he became culturally influential and was contemplating running as governor of Nevada.

Russo became an insider, and his friend Nick Rockefeller was openly sharing the playbook of his American oligarch plans. However being a righteous citizen, he refused to go along, and blew the whistle instead in an interview with Alex Jones, back when Jones was doing solid work, years before he sold out. Here is the 3 minute segment where Russo talks about the origins and goals of modern 2nd wave feminism, a year before he died of cancer:

A longer 13min excerpt where Russo talks about broader oligarch goals (CFR, 9/11, socialism etc):

Gay rights came about because feminism got all it wanted (women in cubicle farms, colleges, the notion of "patriarchy" prevailing in academia and the popular mindset, hostile masculine women etc), so it was time to move to a more subversive segment to spearhead the war on traditional society for total societal control.

And once gay rights were achieved, which was done 10 years ago (gay marriage, acceptance and promotion), it was time to move to trans rights, and the attack on the basic nature of gender, this is where we are today, part of the never-ending culture war and the emanation of the (((revolutionary spirit))), the deep uprooting and overhaul of traditional Christian society, which started with the French Revolution two and a half centuries ago.

[BelyyTigr]

I struggle to work out why something as truly pathetic as dinnermashing ie sodomy should be promoted.
Here's some ideas:-

1)queers don't procreate. It cuts down the population of first worlders who expect liberties and decent living standards.
2)it covers up the endocrine pollutant disaster that in large part caused homo and tranneyism.
3)a sterile population (see endocrine disruptors) allows the Establishment to create life intro-veneous according to their desires ie subservient.
4)fags are subservient against the Establishment.
5)Smokescreen - pretend the Left is about sodomy etc rather than challenging the corrupt financial elite that steal people's livings and living standards. Notice how Clinton is as economically right wing as Trump, infact far more so in many ways.
6)A way to attack Christianity. Neoliberalism seems to share much with satanism aka "law of the jungle" - sexual, social and economic anarchy. Yet the propaganda is that Christians are "hateful bigots" rather than people who believe in love to all and self control.
(The homo propagandists are grooming people to think sexual intercourse is ok with anyone/anyTHING they love eg children, relatives and God knows what!)
7)A way to begin censorship, social media "lynch mobbing" and overt propagandisation. See the innocent lives ruined by the BS surrounding "metoo" - which never looked at sodomites!
Its like "the Devil appearing as a meek and mild man". They get away with censoring, but would not if it was about economic abuse or war crimes. Ofcourse the censorship could include economic matters at a later date.
7b)Notice how in the 1980s much British music was about either economic suffering or faggotry.
More music about faggotry means less people thinking about economic suffering.
8)Make people forget about economic ambition and success or providing for children. "Freedom" now becomes how many dicks they can fit up their arses during a fag parade instead.
9)More control over people by linking sexual psychology to behaviour. In the past, men strove to be wealthy to attract quality females. It was ingrained from an early age. What happens when AI takes over jobs? Or China means Westerners just can't get as wealthy as earlier generations? Well the Establishment can brainwash people into ever more deviant forms of sexual behaviour. I think the long term aim is some sort of gimpism. Here losers crave being dominated by butch dykes or even fellow fags ie a form of slavery. Rather than striving to be successful and attractive to females. Some of this shit eg bdsm/"strong powerful women" garbage we are seeing in propaganda today. Ofcourse sexualised slavery would be easy to fit into some sort of full on dictatorial state in the future.

Personally I think we need to campaign against the brainwashing of kids. They aren't allowed to watch porn. Why on Earth should they be sold the lifestyle of cockjockeys? Why on Earth are crackpots prescribing them "hormone treatment" to become tranneys at a young age. It is pure evil. Disturbing times ahead.

[scotian]

(05-07-2019 02:58 PM)partyfowl Wrote:  

Now 12% of America is gay, it is literally the gayest place in the world.

Bruh

[img][/img]

[partyfowl]

(05-08-2019 09:28 AM)scotian Wrote:  

(05-07-2019 02:58 PM)partyfowl Wrote:  

Now 12% of America is gay, it is literally the gayest place in the world.

Bruh

[img][/img]

Still America as far as I am concerned

[semibaron]

12%? Where do you get these numbers from?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demog...ted_States

4,5% is more likely.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(05-08-2019 05:56 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I'm not going to hold my revulsion, and I'm happy to call it the globohomo regime because there's no face of feminism that elicits immediate gut revulsion to the same degree as two men kissing.

Women working and voting is done. It's a fact. It's never going to change this side of a collapse and/or revolution.

Globohomo faggotry is a battleground that the normies are still up for grabs in.

Fight today's fights. Not the ones we already lost decades ago.

I see your point. But I have a different perspective. Maybe it's because I spent so many years inside the media bubble. I see the fight against feminism as very much today's fight. Feminism seems to be the gift that unfortunately keeps on giving.

#metoo affects men's day-to-day lives. The recent Supreme Court hearing (among other things) showed unsubstantiated accusations can turn a man's life upside down. This was not the case years ago, but idiocy like "believe women" changed that. This is the mindless, radical college feminism from the 1990s dressed up for an adult audience.

Then there are all the girls being shuttled into colleges and into the workforce at the expense of men, who might actually use the higher learning for something important, not to become "marketing professionals."

I see these two issues as related. A lot of women no longer find men to support them through traditional means (i.e. marriage), so now they do it through the legal system with bullshit sexual harassment or discrimination lawsuits. I call this "corporate alimony" (TM!!!!).

Speaking of colleges, the continuous hysteria on campuses is another unfortunate product of feminism. When you get a majority female space, the culture changes. This is why colleges went from teaching men engineering to touting ridiculous concepts like "safe spaces" and re-defining speech women don't like as "hate."

Then there's the media's constant pushing of women's sports, which affects Title IX enforcement. Fewer boys sports teams means more disenfranchised boys.

Speaking of Title IX, the Obama Administration had the bright idea of using it to create kangaroo courts for sexual assault claims. This led to a bizarre culture where consensual sex could be retroactively revoked. Enter Matress Girl.

I'm writing this stuff of the top of my head. A book could be written on it. There's also the way college freshman orientations became anti-male propaganda about the sexual assaults that don't happen nearly as much as colleges claim. And there's the way employees are forced to listen to the anti-male rhetoric of HR departments at those idiotic seminars. I'm old enough to remember a time where this did not go on.

And don't get me started on female Affirmative-Action hires. It's one thing to be working at Walmart and realize the women can't lift the boxes so you have to. It's another when you get a clearly unqualified female surgeon and you're on the operating table thinking "Oh shit!" (this actually happened to someone I know).

So, in conclusion, I see the feminist influence as something that's still very much a fight. It's become so ingrained in our culture that it's sometimes hard to see. Wait, sorry it's not that hard to see. I left two words out of my rant....Fat acceptance!!

[Parlay44]

(05-07-2019 09:51 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

To which I say: "Had all these women been married with three kids -- like my mother was by age 29 -- they would not be watching these shows. In fact, these shows would not be on the air because when married women with kids had a big influence on society, it was far more conservative. Shows like 'The Brady Bunch' made up prime time."

Isn't it amazing how popping out a kid magically makes women more conservative? Now they actually worry about where the income stream will come from to support them and their hellspawn instead when the next ladies night is and how much cock they can consume in a given year.

[Rorogue]

Tried to embed this tweet but didn't work.

Could've posted it in the Honk Honk thread

https://mobile.twitter.com/mel_faith1/st...6669242368

[Leonard D Neubache]

About time to start carrying around spraypaint cans.

Oddly enough I was trying to think of how to deface that picture that would maximally enrage the faggots.

My first thought was "swastika" but it was immediately eclipsed on a planetary scale by instead writing "God will forgive you if you repent".

Ain't that strange?

[VNvet]

(05-10-2019 12:30 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  



About time to start carrying around spraypaint cans.

Oddly enough I was trying to think of how to deface that picture that would maximally enrage the faggots.

My first thought was "swastika" but it was immediately eclipsed on a planetary scale by instead writing "God will forgive you if you repent".

Ain't that strange?

Fred Phelps "God Hates Fags" signs always triggered the gays. Westboro Baptist Church uses GodHatesFags.com for a reason.

Speaking of that, most gays are atheist. So it's even funnier when they get mad that "le sky fairy" hates them and they're going to hell. The narcissism of those people.

[Leonard D Neubache]

It's oddly the same as when atheists go ape-shit because a Christian says "I'm going to pray for you".

I can't think of anything more benign if you actually believed there was no God but for some reason a lot of them get triggered to all fuck by it. I'm not full-Godpill but it certainly speaks to the theme of demonic possession that they violently recoil from something which is theoretically harmless.