Quote: (08-23-2018 12:18 PM)Big Papi Wrote:
https://nypost.com/2018/08/23/tinder-tra...ping-guys/
Stupid cunt liberals - so the crap was officially to prove how evil you are when having a bunch of requirements and quick selection criteria based on looks?
Bitch - most of those you mentioned height, race etc. - they were unalienable requirements of women. The list of female conditions is legion.
The men who posted "no tats" or "no fatties" are likely few and far in between - besides - those criteria are not unalienable. You choose to get tattoos and it's up to you what you make with your body. Besides - everyone has looks preferences.
I hope that the black "winner" gets to hate-fuck her - though I very much doubt that. I also liked that other black anti-feminazi hero who interrupted her in her ego-interview.
You don't waste time of people and play with their emotions just for giggles, business and your own political agenda.
Fuck off with that bullshit - no wonder that some guys were even talking with the cop over whether this was illegal. It's not - it's just fucked up and bad taste. You saw it in the faces of all those men when they heard it was some kind of stupid scam.
I predict that the stunt will backfire on the company.
Comments on the videO:
Quote:Quote:
This is no more than a view-grabbing stunt disguised as insightful commentary. Not only did you maliciously manipulate hundreds of people for the sake of a prank video, you also also minimized their humanity by leading many on who genuinely looked forward to meeting someone they felt they could've had a connection with. Instead of making a video with hundreds of volunteers to participate in your social media-Bachelorette (which I'm absolutely sure you could have), you chose to trick innocent men who had no ill intentions into clearing their schedules, taking trains, and trying to appear their best into being humiliated. Rather than actually swiping on eligible matches, you swiped on anyone and everyone, including people I'm sure felt extremely lucky to go on a date with someone who was so willing to meet them.
And here her own statements:
Quote:Quote:
Interesting quotes from Natasha from her Elite Daily article: [b]""I wanted to show the world that women are the ones with the power nowadays. For years, women have been oppressed in society by men, and only recently have we managed to turn the tables."
"My main goal was public humiliation, to showcase the obsessive nature men have (as is evident by the fact that lots of them stuck around after the ruse had been revealed.) I feel like this goal was achieved."
"This was something I had been thinking of doing for a long time ever since my ex-boyfriend [editor's note: name has been redacted] cheated on me a couple of years ago, and at last I was finally there. The humiliation factor of it for the men was a great feeling, and I felt very desirable."[/b]
So yeah - her MAIN GOAL WAS HUMILIATION BECAUSE SHE GOT DUMPED BY HER EX (and likely quite a few other good-looking high-achieving men in NYC)
Problem is that she is attractive, but not super-attractive and she is a cunt. Who wants that?