[david.garrett84]

(06-06-2018 10:00 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

"I am only size eight"... She just had to put that out there. Anyway: Suck shit. Karma's a bitch.

She deals with nubile, younger, hotter women all the time and this is her way to soothe the impact of the wall.

"I am only size eight" = "I've hit the wall, I secretly drink two bottles of wine many nights a week to drown my sorrows, and take a thirsty 28-year-old man's dick into bed from time to time to make myself partially feel like the real young hotties I dress up every day. I keep myself from being a deplorable size ten with very slimming cocaine, too."

[Rocha]

Good reaction to a bully in some russian tube.

Thruth be told is that many guys are devoid of masculinity nowadays, and are just fuckin drones looking at their cellphones, almost vegetative, they could do some shit to help, yell at the bully, call cops, stop the train, etc. She is right indeed on that, she is only wrong in excusing the "asian" of wrongdoing, instead of pointing out his criminal behaviour.

But...Women do what Men allow them to do... So it is also men's fault that she has this kind of thinking.

[Captainstabbin]

Obligatory - This wouldn't happen if she was in the kitchen where she belongs.

Guarantee this woman has supported every government policy that lead to this.

[david.garrett84]

Quote:

"My father is Muslim, mother COE, aunt Jewish & husband similarly mixed. We're the future&its lovely x."

The David G. version:

"My father comes from a formerly oppressed Irish family, in which presumably some of my ancestors survived by eating the remains of their siblings during the Potato Famine... my mother's surname is Jewish, indicating my veins are dripping with the bloodied screams of persecuted Chosen people... my uncle is black... my Labrador is yellow... and my cat is a wonderful biracial mix of black and white... I apologized for my German Christian ancestors' treatment of the Poles by nearly knocking up a bunch of Polish girls... I also contributed to peace on the Korean peninsula and Sino-Australian relations by jizzing in a bunch of Korean and Chinese cunts. We're the future&its lovely x."

[BlueResolute]

Today, men commit the courageous act of running away from a woman crying for help.

[Kona]

I didnt know they had six foot tall Asians.

Edit: Scotland yard is currently looking for yao ming

Aloha!

[Leonard D Neubache]

I suppose it's not to anyone's benefit to simply go back and forth over why intervening in a situation like this is a bad idea. It's more helpful to explain the why in detail. This forum typically approaches the nature of women in relation to sexual manipulation one way or another, but there are other facets of their ingrained behavior where it's important to understand the nature of women so you don't get blindsided with bad outcomes for "nice" behavior.

What I'm going to go into here is stuff that a lot of guys understand on a basic level yet without having an appreciation for the nuts and bolts level of how it works.

My experience in this field is drawn mostly as a guard who had to deal routinely with issues of domestic violence and female mental health issues in health care settings. This has been complimented by the mentorship in these issues of the older guards who I foolishly dismissed as fossils until I was proven wrong often enough to accept reality.

I'll open with the big premise.

Women do not do "gratitude" except where it's a convenient entry to gain the continued patronage of someone they're sexually interested in.

This is not limited to saving them from a violent encounter. We are generally painfully aware here that an ugly man who changes a flat tire for a woman and a handsome man who does likewise will receive two vastly different responses. The handsome man will be showered with praise and offers of future rendezvous while the ugly man will have to suffer the woman standing silently and awkwardly to one side as she fidgets, desperate for the horrible ordeal to disappear in her rear view mirror.

For most women in any stage of fertility there is no such thing as gratitude. Only an opening to gain sexual access to a suitable set of genetics.

The second part of this equation is arguably more cruel.

Women are biologically driven shut out men they owe an obligation to when that man is not considered to be sexually suitable. Worse, they will actively seek to harm that man's social standing in order to "get rid of him" rather than suffer his continued proximity under the burden of a debt they don't wish to recognize.

Hear me, young pups, as I tell the tale of two guards. One as ugly as sin, the other an Adonissian vision of male charm. Several damsels found themselves under duress. A vicious, drunk cad was attacking their booth at their place of work. The ugly guard arrived first on scene and bore the lion's share of the peril in restraining the attacker. The gorgeous guard arrived second and merely provided support to finalise the matter.

Who got the credit from all these women? You guessed it. But worse. The women soon began to find agreement that the ugly guard who had long since been accepted as benign in his patrols suddenly took on an aura of creepiness, such that a request was made to management that the creepy guard should be left to patrol outside while the gorgeous guard patrol the booths.

That, gentlemen, is how female gratitude manifests itself.

Moving on.

When faced with a violent encounter a woman's first reaction is to secure her survival. "White middle class men, save me!"

What most men don't understand is that the very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

Did that go by you too quickly? Again.

The very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

This is why police will save a woman from being stabbed by her deranged husband and she will provide a report mere minutes later that the police busted in and assaulted him for no reason. Not only will she says this but she will believe it down to her core.

You can bet on it again and again and again and you will not be disappointed. If a woman has to choose between telling the truth and protecting "her tribe" (even if that's loosely defined as progressives-plus their human pets) then she will lie until the end of time to protect her tribe. She does this effortlessly because her tribe is intrinsically linked to her ego. It's a survival mechanism that ensures she places her own children above everyone else's, even if her "child" is a 6 foot "unwell asian man".

These are not principles on female modus operandi. They are iron laws.

Respect these laws and account for them or suffer the consequences.

p.s. If you wonder now what the difference is between white-knighting in the 50's and white knighting today then the million dollar question is this.

Does the woman I'm trying to save consider me to be part of her tribe or a factional enemy?

[RatInTheWoods]

She should be celebrating that AT LAST the TOXIC MASCULINITY has been programmed out of her native English men.

And replaced with gina tingling manliness of women beating imports!

50 years of feminism has finally paid dividends....

[rudebwoy]

The issue isn't the attacker, it is the fact that no man was paying any attention to her.

Had she been younger or better looking, someone would have come to her defense. I went online to find out her age, seems to be missing.

Her being a CEO, means jack shit to the story. The heading should have read "unattractive middle-aged single women with one child, gets verbally berated on the Tube".

I wouldn't intervene, unless some crazy was talking shit to my "woman".

[BlueResolute]

(06-06-2018 10:36 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  

The issue isn't the attacker, it is the fact that no man was paying any attention to her.

Had she been younger or better looking, someone would have come to her defense.

Her being a CEO, means jack shit to the story.

I wouldn't intervene, unless some crazy was talking shit to my "woman".

If anything, it could have been seen as a girl arguing with her middle eastern "asian" boyfriend.

[rudebwoy]

She is 46, rest my case.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/styl...daughters/

[la bodhisattva]

(06-06-2018 08:28 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  

I'm going to get attacked for this, but honestly? If you saw someone, who was initially just minding their business getting attacked, man or woman, would you just stand there?

Who gives a shit if she's a female CEO or not? There's a such thing as human decency, and even if the favor is not returned, if you're witnessing an assault you do something about it. The woman in this case is right. If the man was mentally deranged, he needs to be locked up. He can't control himself. The people who shied away? They were in full control of their actions and chose to do nothing. This is the society we've devolved to.

How are we supposed to return the west to the way things are supposed to be if we can't stand up for an innocent person being assaulted? That's pretty sad.

I have pretty good feminist/leftist radar, so yes, I'd sit idly by watching cultural enrichment take its course. I'm not some random, privileged feminist's protector and I'll be damned if I'll put my safety on the line for someone who is willingly attempting to destroy everything that has made Western civilization the beacon of the world while simultaneously vilifying my very existence simply due to my skin color, sex, and sexual orientation.

[The Catalyst]

Progressives are biologically wired to betray the in-group/conservatives.

They also really like predation if it affects r/K equally, or better yet, affects K disproportionally more.

It's really kind of silly to save someone from harm if the chance of them being a prog is sufficiently high, because it's the prog mentality that "sicced" the predation of everyone(and conservatives). Save your conservative instincts to defend the innocents on non-progs, to encourage the population to become more K and end this madness.

Edit: She is British right? So why is she not using metric? That's the most ridiculous part of this whole story. Metric is an obviously better measuring system.

[Higgs Bosun]

(06-06-2018 09:59 PM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  

I think this tells the whole story. This cunt isn't a run of the mill deluded feminist harpy. She's an alien subversive who hates the British people and has taken every opportunity to lash out at "white men" in the past. Her most recent outburst does not stem from some kind of deluded outrage that the people she hates didn't save her from what she surely considers to be her "fellow minority." I'm almost certain her response to the attack is just a cynically calculated maneuver to make the most of a bad (to her) outcome by using it to attack the people she perceives to be her hated enemy.

Now, I can't really get very outraged by this since I'm not British. All I can say is that if this POS held the nationality of my Eastern European homeland and an analogous situation went down over there, I wouldn't merely not intervene to save her the beatdown at the hands of the Enricher. I'd actively hope she gets her ass beaten to death and in so doing removes at least one threat to the survival of my people. These fucks want me dead, and I'm happy to return the favor since to do anything else is to Cuck.

[Bienvenuto]

If he'd have harmed her we'd be reading about it so I'm doubtful about that 'kick'.

Leonard is right about her tribal flip flopping mechanism.

I was in Manchester City centre where two young thugs were beating an old guy to a pulp. People 'intervening' (including one grandstanding Middle Eastern/ Indian guy) were just standing there talking and posturing while the guy got kicked in the head and blood was spraying.

I got off the bus, ran up, they went for me as I moved in, TL; DR people around me started screaming, one (hot) girl drops her handbag, stares at me as she screams. I decide to get the fuck out of dodge (one guy runs up as I leave and pats me on the back) and call in that Ive been assaulted once I'm out of the area.

The police tell me that the two thugs have been named in 100 incident reports in the last 6 months. They are also still hospitalised. (well Ive got stitches and can hardly walk).

The old guy says he wants no bar of any trial when he gets out of treatment. There are no other witnesses coming forward. Never saw anything in the media. the likelihood is I will be put on trial for 2 counts of GBH unless all parties withdraw their statements. We all withdraw our statements. I breathe a sigh of relief.

Fuck that bitch. She got assaulted? How bad? But she's a size 8! She wouldn't raise a finger for me.

Uk/ the tube/ Us/ Vietnam. People get shit all the time. They don't get help, they certainly don't get headlines.

[rudebwoy]

She is 46, long past her prime.

A decent white man of her age, would want no part of her.

End of Story.

[Sherman]

One thing the article doesn't mention is that in socialist countries, they really frown on people defending themselves. I have included a link to a story below where a 78 year old pensioner was arrested for defending himself from a burglar in his own home. Also, not every jurisdiction gives you the right to defend another person. That is the reason why men in these countries tend to be so passive. When I was in London years ago, I wasn't overly impressed by the tube. My one memory is giving the guy at the gate some coins for a ticket, and he said they were counterfit, and I had to pay again. These days, the only tube I will ride is the youtube.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04...sioner-78/

[Leonard D Neubache]

Here's a viable alternative if you want to try and get the best of both worlds (intervening and not being fucked for it afterwards).

You take out your phone and record the situation so the viewer has a frame of reference.

Then you loudly ask the woman "oi lovie, why don't y' do that girly kung fu stuff like on the movies? Y'be needin' some 'elp from the white western patriarchy then, do ya?"

Don't let her just nod. Tell her.

"Ask. For. My. Help."

Odds are the nutter realizes he's part of a larger scene and withdraws. God forbid you have to intervene you have some serious proof of the reality of the situation and the femcunt will be less inclined to lie through her teeth if she knows she'll be inviting public embarrassment.

Then you chuck the video on Youtube regardless.

I'm convinced there's something borderline spiritual about actually requiring someone to ask for your help rather than simply assuming they need it and providing it without a specific request.

Married guys will know this well, in their own way.

If a wife bitches about something and it magically gets fixed every time she complains then the man's work is attributed to the "magic fixer gnomes" that do shit for her while she's not looking.

It's important to make her ask for you to do something specifically.

"Ugh", she says, "I can't stand this ugly colour on the wall any more."

Personally I make fun of her. "What a dilemma", I reply, "If only there was someone you could ask to help you with this problem you're having."

And like a ray of sunshine has parted the clouds she remembers that there aren't really any magical fixing gnomes. She remembers that it's me that gets shit done, and that without me she'd be stuck, so she becomes submissive and asks, "mi amor, could you please paint that wall a different colour?"

Spoken words can carry weight.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

She's blaming the bystanders, not the actual criminal.

Further proof that the dystopian vision of society show in the finale of "Seinfeld" is becoming reality. As Jackie Chiles said,

"They were innocent bystanders. Now, you just think about that term. 'Innocent. Bystanders.' Because that's exactly what they were. We know they were bystanders, nobody's disputing that. So how can a bystander be guilty? No such thing. Have you ever heard of a guilty bystander? No, because you cannot be a bystander and be guilty. Bystanders are by definition, innocent. That is the nature of bystanding. But no, they want to change nature here. They want to create a whole new animal - the guilty bystander. Don't you let them do it. Only you can stop them."

[Richard Turpin]

It's fun to pick through incidents like this after the event and I'm in accordance with the spirit of most of the replies so far.

It's best not to overthink 'how you would react' too much though, as I can guarantee that in real life our response would be instinctual. If you were sitting opposite this bitch you would 'just know' that she was a cunt and would be happy to sit things out and hopefully have a bag of popcorn at hand to munch on.

Alternatively, if there was even a hint that she a) wasn't a bitch, and b) was both worth saving/of your tribe and c) in genuine need of assistance then I've no doubt that most here would be happy to get stuck in and dish out some righteous violence, hang the consequences. You don't need to worry about 'how you would know?', cos you just would.

These horrible white men obviously had good instincts and acted quite correctly. If they are young, they'll need their energy for their own people, once things kick-off proper, no sense helping their enemies.

[HornyRamone]

I think it's time for white middle, lower and middle class men to go on strike and let our (YES - OUR) civilization completely collapse for awhile.

[Barron]

(06-06-2018 10:28 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I suppose it's not to anyone's benefit to simply go back and forth over why intervening in a situation like this is a bad idea. It's more helpful to explain the why in detail. This forum typically approaches the nature of women in relation to sexual manipulation one way or another, but there are other facets of their ingrained behavior where it's important to understand the nature of women so you don't get blindsided with bad outcomes for "nice" behavior.

What I'm going to go into here is stuff that a lot of guys understand on a basic level yet without having an appreciation for the nuts and bolts level of how it works.

My experience in this field is drawn mostly as a guard who had to deal routinely with issues of domestic violence and female mental health issues in health care settings. This has been complimented by the mentorship in these issues of the older guards who I foolishly dismissed as fossils until I was proven wrong often enough to accept reality.

I'll open with the big premise.

Women do not do "gratitude" except where it's a convenient entry to gain the continued patronage of someone they're sexually interested in.

This is not limited to saving them from a violent encounter. We are generally painfully aware here that an ugly man who changes a flat tire for a woman and a handsome man who does likewise will receive two vastly different responses. The handsome man will be showered with praise and offers of future rendezvous while the ugly man will have to suffer the woman standing silently and awkwardly to one side as she fidgets, desperate for the horrible ordeal to disappear in her rear view mirror.

For most women in any stage of fertility there is no such thing as gratitude. Only an opening to gain sexual access to a suitable set of genetics.

The second part of this equation is arguably more cruel.

Women are biologically driven shut out men they owe an obligation to when that man is not considered to be sexually suitable. Worse, they will actively seek to harm that man's social standing in order to "get rid of him" rather than suffer his continued proximity under the burden of a debt they don't wish to recognize.

Hear me, young pups, as I tell the tale of two guards. One as ugly as sin, the other an Adonissian vision of male charm. Several damsels found themselves under duress. A vicious, drunk cad was attacking their booth at their place of work. The ugly guard arrived first on scene and bore the lion's share of the peril in restraining the attacker. The gorgeous guard arrived second and merely provided support to finalise the matter.

Who got the credit from all these women? You guessed it. But worse. The women soon began to find agreement that the ugly guard who had long since been accepted as benign in his patrols suddenly took on an aura of creepiness, such that a request was made to management that the creepy guard should be left to patrol outside while the gorgeous guard patrol the booths.

That, gentlemen, is how female gratitude manifests itself.

Moving on.

When faced with a violent encounter a woman's first reaction is to secure her survival. "White middle class men, save me!"

What most men don't understand is that the very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

Did that go by you too quickly? Again.

The very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.

This is why police will save a woman from being stabbed by her deranged husband and she will provide a report mere minutes later that the police busted in and assaulted him for no reason. Not only will she says this but she will believe it down to her core.

You can bet on it again and again and again and you will not be disappointed. If a woman has to choose between telling the truth and protecting "her tribe" (even if that's loosely defined as progressives-plus their human pets) then she will lie until the end of time to protect her tribe. She does this effortlessly because her tribe is intrinsically linked to her ego. It's a survival mechanism that ensures she places her own children above everyone else's, even if her "child" is a 6 foot "unwell asian man".

These are not principles on female modus operandi. They are iron laws.

Respect these laws and account for them or suffer the consequences.

p.s. If you wonder now what the difference is between white-knighting in the 50's and white knighting today then the million dollar question is this.

Does the woman I'm trying to save consider me to be part of her tribe or a factional enemy?

[HornyRamone]

(06-06-2018 08:59 PM)Investment Bro Wrote:  

(06-06-2018 08:49 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

Your premise is faulty. It assumes you control the ongoing burden of risk. You don't.

We're not talking about risking your skin to save some harpy. We're talking about risking your skin to save some harpy who then uses it as an excuse to virtue signal against you in favor of the attacker because the very second the danger is over she's already rewriting the incident in her head to conform to her progressive world view.

This is not "intervene and be done with it". This is "intervene and wake up the next day to find you've lost your friends, your job, your career and possibly your freedom".

Think about it for God's sake, man. This woman has already hamstered that the "asian" attacker was "unwell" and that the real villains were the "WHITE MIDDLE CLASS MEN" that didn't intervene.

What on earth do you think her police report would look like if you'd have stepped up and had to give the guy a flogging?!

That's a quite a conjecture, and quite frankly I'm very glad I've never met any individual who would cause me to assume something like that.

We could spend all day speculating what might happen afterwards, but that's not the point I'm trying to make.

Let me ask you this Leonard, if it was your wife in that situation, could you look me in the eye and tell me that there was no shame on the other men on that train for refusing to put down a deranged person?

You didn't ask me, but I'll offer my two cents because I'm married. My wife isn't a virtue signalling cunt that hates white men for their mere existence.


This women could be batshit crazy for all I know. Would I enjoy watching her get her views torn apart in the public space? Definitely. Would I enjoy watching her get assaulted by mentally deranged scum? Is that the kind of society you want, where such a thing comes to pass and no one does anything?

Yes, absolutely. Conservatives want a high trust society with morals, law and positive leaders and role models. Progressives want another society, a society completely antithetical to that. The two groups are incompatible, and until the West balkanizes or enters a civil war, I want society to crumble so progressives experience the repercussions of their actions and the current globalist system crashes.

[Renzy]

Just last week the New York Times had an article about raising boys not to be chivalrous.

Quote:

“One thing you want to be careful of,” he said, “is teaching boys to be chivalrous. We need to stop socializing boys to see women as needing protection.”

It's <current-year> guys. Women don't need protection! That's the same sexist argument misogynists have tried to use to keep women out of combat.

Not only should the cis-white-male bystanders who refused to intervene not be condemned, they should be congratulated for being double-plus good feminists who avoided engaging in "benevolent sexism":

Quote:

benevolent sexism, which subtly demeans women as fragile and less competent. It reinforces a sexual script in which a man takes charge while a woman remains passive.”

Shame on the posters in this thread who thought those men should "man up", jump in, and "take charge" of the situation. Don't you guys read the internet? Are you trying to make women look "fragile and less competent?"

Parents can make sure their sons don't absorb such toxic masculine ideas by:

Quote:

refraining from telling boys to “man up” when they showed emotion or valorizing physical dominance

Congratulations ladies!

It sounds like you're getting exactly what you asked for. Men who no longer "valorize physical dominance", no longer see women as "needing protection", and who are no longer reinforcing "a sexual script in which a man takes charge while a woman remains passive."

[Rocha]

At least those guys could have filmed it and scream "World Star!".

But yeah, given that the source is the Sun tabloid, probably this situation did not even ocurred and it is just an unfortunate attempt at thoughtprovoking through a feminist article. #fakenews

And also funny the label "Fashion CEO", she can have a company with 1 employee (her), that she is automatically the CEO.