[Blaster]

Twitter account currently replying to tweets with blatant anti-white racism and swapping the races. I wonder how long it will last before it gets banned and I'm mildly curious to see what sort of retarded excuse twitter comes up with.

https://twitter.com/notracistwhen

[Foolsgo1d]

I'm not sure what the point of this is other than to further antagonise each side and state the obvious.

[Malone]

It's not obvious to everyone though.

Sensible people think both tweets are racist.

Moronic lefties think only white people can be racist, thus only one of those is a racist statement.

Lots of the aforementioned sensible people don't know that about their moronic lefty neighbors. They need to know. This is valuable education for the normies.

Also educational is the shrieking chimp death threat fest that is a lefty reaction. The more these loons are dragged into the sunlight, the less power they will have.

[Yatagan]

*Yawn*, more conservative "You're the real racists!", cause we all know how effective that's been these past few decades.

[Brother Abdul Majeed]

This tit-for-tat technique doesn't pay dividends at all.

Feminists and race-baiters know exactly how hypocritical they are. They exult in it. They gleefully wait for reactions like this so they can come out with the "male tears" and "fragile white" response.

Ignoring their nonsense is the best strategy. The opposite of love isn't hate, it's apathy.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

Still interesting to see all the tweets combined. Of course there is a double standard - some even imperceptibly part of most White Western societies .

[Duke Castile]

The point is not to convince racists minorities they are racist and that’s “not good”

It’s to wake up the housewife in Minnisota that thinks “oh those people are just like me and only want a better life”.

When she sees the hypocrisy and hatred and looks over at her little blonde haired blue eyed son she *may* start thinking a border wall is not so bad of an idea.

It also shows white normies what their precious social media thinks of them.

[Leonard D Neubache]

Exposing the hypocrisy of the left is a legitimate goal but unless they're adding hashtags that are going to allow it to be seen by that housewife in Minnesota then it's pointless agitation.

[Easy_C]

Agitation isn't pointless. The more we can goad them into flipping their shit the better it is for us

[demolition]

This falls squarely into the category of, "I don't think this will be useful since this has legitimately been the standard line of attack since the 1980s, but I'm certainly not going to discourage people joining the fray on the right side."

[Rush87]

Delete.

[CynicalContrarian]

In a way, you want soy-cialist activists to push the envelope, cause the more their derangement is exposed. The more they marginalize themselves.
Case in point, this whole 'Count Dankula / Nazi pug' thing.

Plus, mockery of Useful Idiots is fun.

[Gmac]

Funny but a waste of time.

[Richard Turpin]

(03-20-2018 07:59 AM)Malone Wrote:  

Lots of the aforementioned sensible people don't know that about their moronic lefty neighbors. They need to know. This is valuable education for the normies.

This is a good point and reminds me of my shock when I first reluctantly joined Facebook many years ago, when I suddenly learned how many of my friends and colleagues were rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth lefties. Particularly around Brexit, when some of them went absolutely nuts, issuing threats, blocking 'friends' who voted to leave, arguing like fuck.

Before FB, I would have fully expected most of them to broadly agree with my views on most matters, yet judging by some of their posts they would probably want to see me dead if they knew how diametrically opposed I am to most of their insane worldview.

I find FB to do a very useful service in this regard and have often checked someone's profile before meeting them to assess their level of idiocy. It at least allows me some measure of preparedness before engagement.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

(03-21-2018 10:55 AM)Richard Turpin Wrote:  

This is a good point and reminds me of my shock when I first reluctantly joined Facebook many years ago, when I suddenly learned how many of my friends and colleagues were rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth lefties. Particularly around Brexit, when some of them went absolutely nuts, issuing threats, blocking 'friends' who voted to leave, arguing like fuck.

Before FB, I would have fully expected most of them to broadly agree with my views on most matters, yet judging by some of their posts they would probably want to see me dead if they knew how diametrically opposed I am to most of their insane worldview.

I find FB to do a very useful service in this regard and have often checked someone's profile before meeting them to assess their level of idiocy. It at least allows me some measure of preparedness before engagement.

Most of them are not really evil. The indoctrination went through multiple generations across all levels of education, media and entertainment. What we are seeing now is the product of some 70 years of deep deep changing propaganda.

Even that little vid is not complete, because there were much more fundamental schools to it. It's all funded by one group above to destroy everything that was.

The cultural marxists can only destroy - they have no positive working system out there. Their idea of multicultural multi-racial utopia and their moronic dialectic of identity politics (white Christians being always guilty - all other races and religions being always innocently oppressed somehow) combined with pure hatred of every Western culture is endemic (and all cultures are supposedly equal or better than the Western one).

The system is so pervasive that even men here use the oppression pyramid unconsciously, but we can give it a pass to men here.

The globalists managed to create a system where they indoctrinated a people to eliminate itself, to hate the achievements of their forefathers, to even wipe out their home-countries. It wasn't only the Frankfurt school which has been working on it - countless NGOs going back even 150+ years had those plans up and running. They are busy working on it 24/7 7 days a week.

The fruit of all their labor can be seen on Facebook and Twitter.

And frankly I don't know if there is a solution to it. It's probably something akin to Venezuela where the majority voted in the communists and now they are crying and hunting dogs to survive. The current SJWs and lefties will only realize the errors of their ways when they are living in a diverse shithole:

It was meant as pro-Syrian bombing propaganda, so that the British would support aiding ISIS against Assad. But it is actually more fitting of the coming wars with Islam and diversity in Europe.



In theory you could push back the indoctrination within 1-2 years by total clarity and truth in the media, by banning of cultural marxism in universities and countering all the bullshit. Women would be the first who suddenly react to authority telling them what's what, but this is not going to happen. This would mean that the globalists change the plan and I don't see any reason for them to do so unless there is something unlikely like an Alien invasion and they need suddenly masculine shitlords and scientists to save their asses. Then you would see quickly how political correctness and feminism gets thrown out. My guess is that within 1 month the entire country's mainstream would sound like a mix of Breitbart-Trump-and ReturnOfKings.

But yeah - aside from that I don't have much hope.

[Foolsgo1d]

(03-20-2018 07:59 AM)Malone Wrote:  

It's not obvious to everyone though.

Sensible people think both tweets are racist.

Moronic lefties think only white people can be racist, thus only one of those is a racist statement.

Lots of the aforementioned sensible people don't know that about their moronic lefty neighbors. They need to know. This is valuable education for the normies.

Also educational is the shrieking chimp death threat fest that is a lefty reaction. The more these loons are dragged into the sunlight, the less power they will have.

I'm pretty sure a lot of people are more aware of this then we give credit for and its a good thing in general but when you start making sides out of things you end up losing people because of social stigma.

[Blaster]

(03-20-2018 07:49 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

I'm not sure what the point of this is other than to further antagonise each side and state the obvious.

The point is to expose the sheer volume of anti-white animus out there and tolerated by twitter.

Quote:

*Yawn*, more conservative "You're the real racists!", cause we all know how effective that's been these past few decades.

Not even close. That was about politicians being defensive and ceding moral high ground to democrats. The argument was that Democrats were even more racist to minorities/non-whites than Republicans(soft bigotry, etc.), which obviously no one believed and totally bought into the frame that favored the Democrats. Unlike that, this is highlighting explicit racism directed at white people that most white people tend to not notice, that's it. It's not knee-jerk defensive, is only mildly accusatory, and is not buying into a pre-established frame. It's primarily humorous and mischievous in a way meant to expose truth.

Also, I've been around for decades and the explicit anti-white hatred really has taken a turn for the worse in the past 10 years.

Quote:

This tit-for-tat technique doesn't pay dividends at all.

Feminists and race-baiters know exactly how hypocritical they are. They exult in it. They gleefully wait for reactions like this so they can come out with the "male tears" and "fragile white" response.

Hence the use of satire and humor. That account was essentially just doing simple find/replace on the text of tweets with only a bit of nudging here and there. The argument is won the moment someone chuckles in spite of themselves and recognizes the truth in the humor. Once that happens, SJWs can scream and whine and hurl their canned retorts all they want. The audience will have moved on.

It doesn't matter how self-aware the antagonists are.

[Blaster]

Just going to point out that at the time of this posting, the account has 1,614 tweets.

[EndsExpect]

(03-20-2018 09:10 AM)Yatagan Wrote:  

*Yawn*, more conservative "You're the real racists!", cause we all know how effective that's been these past few decades.

It has been ineffective because it isn't backed up by the brute force of government.

If the government openly labeled it hate speech and began prosecuting things would change rapidly.

It's like hate crimes. A while back I was shocked to read that a white couple was abducted and murdered by some black guys. The man was sodomized with an object and raped by one of the murderers... they cut off his genitals and tortured him while still alive then shot him in the back of the head. I believe his name was Chris Newsom. They did similar to his GF.

The police refused to charge this as a hate crime... because this was clearly an act of love. If you look into the case further... the main perpetrator of the crime had just been dumped by a white woman for a white man and was insanely angry about it. It was clearly a fucking hate crime.

So, here is the thing. If the government started treating these acts as hate crimes since they ARE hate crimes... then the culture would follow suit. Most Americans at this point don't independently think... the just follow and believe what the the people in authority say.

[Leonard D Neubache]

If you want to raise awareness about lopsided perpetration of real hatecrimes on one side and lopsided prosecution of trivial non-crimes on the other then that's reasonable, but there are better ways to do it.

By definition all that matters is reaching an audience that is at least partially receptive to the message yet not already on board.

Using Twitter as an angry-man echo-chamber is pointless. You would be better off retweeting that stuff with the hashtag #TheWalkingDead

Otherwise it's just going to people that have already followed you anyway in order to better work toward that stomach ulcer they've always wanted.

[fiasco360]

(03-20-2018 10:00 AM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

This tit-for-tat technique doesn't pay dividends at all.

Feminists and race-baiters know exactly how hypocritical they are. They exult in it. They gleefully wait for reactions like this so they can come out with the "male tears" and "fragile white" response.

Ignoring their nonsense is the best strategy. The opposite of love isn't hate, it's apathy.

I don't know if this is exactly the best strategy overall.

Some of these people are so deluded they don't know they are being hypocritical. They have off-the-wall rationalizations for their thinking. This leaks into the mainstream and the useful idiots go "Yeah racism!"

The point of fighting back isn't because it's going to somehow convert them to your side but it's to win allies who were previously scared, confused or only exposed to one side.

We have completely ignored them for many years and we have reaped those "benefits." Look at the republicucks who got destroyed on accusation alone.

It's at least somewhat acceptable in the last few years to fight this nonsense with something resembling logic and reason - where as before you risked losing your livelihood for being racist or sexist (still happens but people are fighting back now.)

Regardless Twitter is mostly a trash can anyway.

[Mr. Accuride]

Straight to Nazi

[url=https://twitter.com/OrwellNGoode/status/978028977242730497][/url]

[Alsos]

This is not who we are.

We're better than this.

We shouldn't stoop to their level.

Ignoring it is the right way to go.

It's childish and intellectually dishonest.

It's wasting time better spent writing white papers and strongly-worded letters to the editor.

This Buckleyite propriety is the other part of what we've been doing for the past thirty years that hasn't worked.

As with any form of bullying, what does work is punching back - in this case metaphorically, humiliating them by holding up their own words as indictments of their hypocrisy for everyone to see. No, the leftist thus exposed will not feel shame over their remarks, but given how obsessed they are at a fundamental psychological level with social acceptance and being part of the in-group, making sport of them and inspiring others to laugh at or shun them can be viscerally traumatic because of the outgrouping threat it represents.

It's also effective on the other side of the field. One of their own strategists famously observed that what works in activism is what your people enjoy doing. It's impishly fun to do and read this stuff, and especially to see the reactions to it.

ETA: That said, the tweets themselves aren't nearly as funny or provocative as they could be. Or ought to be for this purpose.

[CynicalContrarian]

^
Yep. Use their own tactics against them.

They very much dislike David Hogg being referred to as 'creepy' for example.