I've also found this thread very useful as I'd not really considered that a lot of these fitness guys may be jacking unless they going into Lee Haney territory.
From what I've seen there seems to be a considerable genetic factor (which you may be able to counteract by some means such as a diet tailored to your metabolism) in how good a shape you can get in.
What do you think is the real limit that you can get to without juice when it comes to getting ripped?
Recently I saw an article on this guy:
![[Image: punter-workout-1.jpg]](https://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2012/punter-workout-1.jpg)
This seems like it could be achieved naturally and here's another photo of the same guy where he looks juiced:
![[Image: steve-weathorford-2.jpg]](https://cdn-maf0.heartyhosting.com/sites/muscleandfitness.com/files/media/steve-weathorford-2.jpg)
from an article dubbing him as having one of the most chiseled bodies in the NFL, which he partly puts down to genes.
I have been in decent shape for most of my life, not enough to turn heads, but enough to be noticable from the gen. pop. I'd like to look at upping that this year, but I'm wondering what is realistic. I live in a small town in a rural area and when I went to the gym once to see if there were any good personal trainers I found I was in better shape than all of them except one who didn't have much muscle. The kettle-bells guy was a blob, some of the swimming instructors were blobs and most of the people in the gym were blobs. There was a few guys with low body fat and a bit of definition, but nothing notable. Then there was one guy who was obviously off his head on 'roids. There is one guy I know whose always out in public doing workouts and cross-fitting like he was the Agha Khan - the guy has a considerable overhang. It seems this it the reality for most people.
From what I've seen there seems to be a considerable genetic factor (which you may be able to counteract by some means such as a diet tailored to your metabolism) in how good a shape you can get in.
What do you think is the real limit that you can get to without juice when it comes to getting ripped?
Recently I saw an article on this guy:
![[Image: punter-workout-1.jpg]](https://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/images/2012/punter-workout-1.jpg)
This seems like it could be achieved naturally and here's another photo of the same guy where he looks juiced:
![[Image: steve-weathorford-2.jpg]](https://cdn-maf0.heartyhosting.com/sites/muscleandfitness.com/files/media/steve-weathorford-2.jpg)
from an article dubbing him as having one of the most chiseled bodies in the NFL, which he partly puts down to genes.
I have been in decent shape for most of my life, not enough to turn heads, but enough to be noticable from the gen. pop. I'd like to look at upping that this year, but I'm wondering what is realistic. I live in a small town in a rural area and when I went to the gym once to see if there were any good personal trainers I found I was in better shape than all of them except one who didn't have much muscle. The kettle-bells guy was a blob, some of the swimming instructors were blobs and most of the people in the gym were blobs. There was a few guys with low body fat and a bit of definition, but nothing notable. Then there was one guy who was obviously off his head on 'roids. There is one guy I know whose always out in public doing workouts and cross-fitting like he was the Agha Khan - the guy has a considerable overhang. It seems this it the reality for most people.