Had to post this as I couldn't quite believe it, something so profoundly wrong about this:
Two commenters summed it perfectly:
"This has begun happening in Canadian schools as well.
I have seen this personally, where the school actually moves a child from one class to another for the simple reason that the child formed a tight bond with another, and the school stated "it is unacceptable, and detrimental to both children's development to have relationships that strong at 8 years old. They need to learn to be adaptive, and play with other people".
Of course paraphrased to remove names, but I'm curious if this is a portion of the inclusive and full-curriculum encompassing sex ed to teach kids that these bonds are bad, hence the "be adaptable" in regards to relationships."
So the left is now pushing their agenda to disable children by conditioning them to believe that forming close bonds is a bad thing and by selling this to the parents as 'avoiding other children to feel excluded'.
This is seriously evil and they are trying to disguise it under the shield of 'kindness'.
What this does to these children in later years and their ability to pair bond is truly worrying on many levels.
Satan himself couldn't be coming up with a more cunning and deceiving way to sell evil as kindness.
I am disgusted and people need to reject any further attempts of early mind manipulation and indoctrination via nurseries, preschools and primary schools.
That is despicable. Having a best friend gives you stability when things get stressful. It's easier to deal with bullies or a tough class when you know you have at least one other person to cheer you on and who understands what you're dealing with.
How does the left take something good -- learning to include others -- and turn it into a big pile of steer feces?
This commenter really gets and I relate to it the most:
"As a guy, I don't remember growing up and hearing me and other boys in the class label other kids as ''best friends''. Sure we would refer to each other as ''friends'' on occasion, but the ''best'' part was silently understood whenever it applied and didn't need to be announced. The only kids I saw announcing ''best friends'' were girls who would use it to clique up with some girls and to spite others. The boys would always be best friends for multiple years at a time or throughout the entire 13 years of schooling. Meanwhile the girls would be ''best friends'' one year, enemies the next, best friends the next, frenemies the next, and you get the idea."
My own:
Isn't that the WHOLE FRIGGIN POINT? We get to choose! That childhood friendships are intense and what makes them so funny/exciting and nostalgic. Everything was new and an adventure, like a Legend of Zelda treasure hunt.
I went to a TINY rural primary school in the 1990's, it had 30 pupils in total. 6 in my year, we all knew each other like brothers and sisters. (No inbred jokes please). We had talk to each other because it'd have pretty crazy if we didn't with those numbers.
First they crush family, then religion and then go after not only friendship, but one of the most profoundly innocent and lovely/good things there is, childhood friendship.
Just more communist agenda: separate men and women, parents and kids, families, communities, and friends. Create a nation of cognitive impaired poorly socially networked loner zombies whose only allegiance is the state particularly in the total absence of any other connections. Schools teach social bullshit, but no education or skills. Deep State focuses on social destruction and no hard core security or economic policy issues.
What happened to you can't choose your family but you can choose your friends?
(a saying that is probably a slight against family)
Two commenters summed it perfectly:
"This has begun happening in Canadian schools as well.
I have seen this personally, where the school actually moves a child from one class to another for the simple reason that the child formed a tight bond with another, and the school stated "it is unacceptable, and detrimental to both children's development to have relationships that strong at 8 years old. They need to learn to be adaptive, and play with other people".
Of course paraphrased to remove names, but I'm curious if this is a portion of the inclusive and full-curriculum encompassing sex ed to teach kids that these bonds are bad, hence the "be adaptable" in regards to relationships."
So the left is now pushing their agenda to disable children by conditioning them to believe that forming close bonds is a bad thing and by selling this to the parents as 'avoiding other children to feel excluded'.
This is seriously evil and they are trying to disguise it under the shield of 'kindness'.
What this does to these children in later years and their ability to pair bond is truly worrying on many levels.
Satan himself couldn't be coming up with a more cunning and deceiving way to sell evil as kindness.
I am disgusted and people need to reject any further attempts of early mind manipulation and indoctrination via nurseries, preschools and primary schools.
That is despicable. Having a best friend gives you stability when things get stressful. It's easier to deal with bullies or a tough class when you know you have at least one other person to cheer you on and who understands what you're dealing with.
How does the left take something good -- learning to include others -- and turn it into a big pile of steer feces?
This commenter really gets and I relate to it the most:
"As a guy, I don't remember growing up and hearing me and other boys in the class label other kids as ''best friends''. Sure we would refer to each other as ''friends'' on occasion, but the ''best'' part was silently understood whenever it applied and didn't need to be announced. The only kids I saw announcing ''best friends'' were girls who would use it to clique up with some girls and to spite others. The boys would always be best friends for multiple years at a time or throughout the entire 13 years of schooling. Meanwhile the girls would be ''best friends'' one year, enemies the next, best friends the next, frenemies the next, and you get the idea."
My own:
Isn't that the WHOLE FRIGGIN POINT? We get to choose! That childhood friendships are intense and what makes them so funny/exciting and nostalgic. Everything was new and an adventure, like a Legend of Zelda treasure hunt.
I went to a TINY rural primary school in the 1990's, it had 30 pupils in total. 6 in my year, we all knew each other like brothers and sisters. (No inbred jokes please). We had talk to each other because it'd have pretty crazy if we didn't with those numbers.
First they crush family, then religion and then go after not only friendship, but one of the most profoundly innocent and lovely/good things there is, childhood friendship.
Just more communist agenda: separate men and women, parents and kids, families, communities, and friends. Create a nation of cognitive impaired poorly socially networked loner zombies whose only allegiance is the state particularly in the total absence of any other connections. Schools teach social bullshit, but no education or skills. Deep State focuses on social destruction and no hard core security or economic policy issues.
What happened to you can't choose your family but you can choose your friends?
(a saying that is probably a slight against family)