rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


U.S. Supreme Court nominations

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/willsommer/status/1091043745984843778][/url]

Gorka: "...go outside and lick a metal street lamp."
[Image: laugh4.gif]
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

SCOTUS judges don't have to make an appearance at the state of the union. Usually only about half of them show up. RBG is probably at a hospice and half dead already.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

-----

Rico... Sauve....
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Is she dead yet?
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Half-Human, Half-Robot Justice Enters Supreme Court, Introduces Self As Ruth Bader Gins-Borg

[Image: article-3706-1.jpg]

I am afraid that women appreciate cruelty, downright cruelty, more than anything else. They have wonderfully primitive instincts. We have emancipated them, but they remain slaves looking for their masters all the same. They love being dominated.
--Oscar Wilde
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

It is March 2. Why has NO recent picture surfaced anywhere of RBG? The media collusion to keep up the blackout this long is amazing.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

[Image: somehow-lge-the-feeling-the-supreme-cour...741430.png]

[Image: 2rpkzi.jpg]
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Trump may appoint Amy Coney Barret, a Southern Catholic woman, to replace RBG, a northern Jewish woman.

https://www.puppetstringnews.com/blog/re...burgs-seat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Coney_Barrett
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Hell no. No more women. No way. Parscale, if you are listening, tell Trump to stop this shit.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Does anyone have a direct line to the Donald?

Have him bring in a male, heterosexual Justice when RBG dies. He can be black or Mexican, just make sure he is truly conservative and not a female. You can be sure the next democrat president will load up on faggots, women and so on.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

QAnon peddler Neon claims RBG's voice is being edited out.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2019/03/26/br...eonrevolt/

Quote: (09-21-2018 09:31 AM)kosko Wrote:  
For the folks who stay ignorant and hating and not improving their situation during these Trump years, it will be bleak and cold once the good times stop.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Just a feeling but I think Trump wanted to appoint Coney Barret but Kavanagh seemed like a more moderate choice. . .until the sexual assault circus came out of the woodwork. It seems clear that the Democrats are going to be complete dicks about ANY SCOTUS nomination so Trump - the GOAT dick - will just nominate whomever he likes.

Other possibilities are Mike Lee or El Jefe Ted Cruz, but either of them would mean a great loss from the senate and one less potential replacement for Trump in 2024.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

At this point, Buzzie is going to hold out till the elections, whether she's a vegetable or not. She'll resign at the end of the year, and President Yang will get to pick the next judge. [Image: wink.gif]

“Nothing is more useful than to look upon the world as it really is.”
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

The idiocy and outrage over Justice Brett Kavanaugh continues. Apparently he is teaching at George Mason University over the summer and a group of SJW students are trying to get him fired.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/george-mason-...he-justice

Looking at some of the comments from the students, it’s scary that these snowflakes are future lawyers.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

I like Justice Kavanaugh. Getting the girlfriend/wife that he got based on how awful the dating culture is in DC is an accomplishment.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is somehow staying alive and will not quit the bench until death. No one knows how long she'll survive. She might quit if a Democrat gets elected President in 2021.

As a whole, Republican Presidents do a worse job of nominating judges. John Paul Stevens, appointed by Gerald Ford, drifted leftward over time. David Souter was a huge whiff for George H.W. Bush. Anthony Kennedy was a little more left sympathizing than I liked, and that was a Reagan nominee. Meanwhile, Democrats find ways to appoint the most consistently liberal justices to the Supreme Court who continue their assault on the United States Constitution. Obama's picks of Sotomayor and Kagan were exceptional for their liberalism. Sotomayor appears to espouse an anti-male, anti-white ideas. Kagan is pretty far left too. RBG and Stephen Breyer are uncompromising lefties as well.

I think John Roberts has also been a major disappointment in his conservative jurisprudence. That's another whiff for a Republican President. I disagreed with his healthcare ruling and he seems to be showing cuck tendencies.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Justice Thomas and his wife

[Image: tohbf3yu5nqyvu2fx01w.png]

Justice Kav and family

[Image: 5-63.jpg]

Kagan is rumored to be lesbian but is more accurately described as incel.

More here:

https://www.businessinsider.com/spouses-...es-2012-10
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

Quote: (04-14-2019 06:17 AM)Hypno Wrote:  

Justice Kav and family

[Image: 5-63.jpg]

Kagan is rumored to be lesbian but is more accurately described as incel.

https://www.businessinsider.com/spouses-...es-2012-10

Ashley Kavanaugh's hair is on the short side, but that's par for the course for a female in DC. That's probably about as well as a guy could do in DC who is more intellectual than most and not muscular.

I thought Kagan was lesbian. If she is heterosexual, I don't know if incel would be accurate for her. Although I am unable to imagine any man having sex with her, the depths of male thirst shouldn't surprise anyone. I'm sure some guy was definitely hotly pursuing sex with her. No guy would commit to that long term though.

Sotomayor got divorced at 29. She's now 64. She never remarried. I can't imagine that Sotomayor was a big carousel rider in her 30s and 40s, but male thirst. She hasn't gotten another commitment since 1983, which is telling.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

[quote] (04-14-2019 08:54 AM)SW15 Wrote:  

Ashley Kavanaugh's hair is on the short side, but that's par for the course for a female in DC. That's probably about as well as a guy could do in DC who is more intellectual than most and not muscular. /quote]

She is probably 45 or 50, and that has more to do with her hair than anything else. I'd wager she was a hottie before 30.

[quote='SW15' pid='1965468' dateline='1555250099']I thought Kagan was lesbian. If she is heterosexual, I don't know if incel would be accurate for her. Although I am unable to imagine any man having sex with her, the depths of male thirst shouldn't surprise anyone. I'm sure some guy was definitely hotly pursuing sex with her. No guy would commit to that long term though.[/quote]

Highly likely she is just an incel lesbian.

[quote] (04-14-2019 08:54 AM)SW15 Wrote:  

Sotomayor got divorced at 29. She's now 64. She never remarried. I can't imagine that Sotomayor was a big carousel rider in her 30s and 40s, but male thirst. She hasn't gotten another commitment since 1983, which is telling.[/quote]

Could be a lesbian.

Kagan and Sotomayer are extreme leftists. Sexually they are unsuccessful. Kavanaugh, Roberts, Thomas, even RBG were successful sexually.
Reply

U.S. Supreme Court nominations

I have a hypothesis that there will come a point in time where a massive carousel riding heterosexual woman is nominated to the Supreme Court.

Female lawyers tend to be carousel riders. Most of them work a ton and are notorious date flakers, but the ones that actually show up for dates often put out on dates. There is not a lot of longevity with a female lawyer because they simply don't have the time for an extended relationship.

The only thing that could prove my hypothesis false is that the carousel riding female lawyers are more private practice lawyers and not likely on the judge track. Most justices are judges. But you do need a JD to be a judge, and judges are usually lawyers first.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)