A well thought out and well written response. Thank you for taking the time to write that, I enjoy a good debate. You make some valid points, a response to a few below.
It's a discredited idea that war brings even just net economic benefit, even to the countries that were the winners. Yeah, the US got some new tech and several conservative administrations out of WW2.
If it’s discredited, I’d like you to cite a source. WW2 ended the Great Depression and thrust the US economy into its most stable era ever up until the 1970s with Nixons decision to unpeg the dollar from silver. WW2 heralded the invention of the jet engine making global travel what it is today, that’s a net improvement for society on both fronts that lasted long after the end of WW2.
For my part I think we would've ended up a lot better off if we'd just kicked back for the most part and let Stalin and Hitler annihilate themselves
Disagree entirely, US would have been at the mercy of the victorious army, Hitler would have had the A bomb and Stalin would have had a strangle hold over the continent if either had won. I don’t see either of them calling it quits after they were victorious, it would have been your doom.
We also got decades of thousands of nuclear-tipped ICBMs pointed up our ass, ready to wipe us off the face of the map at a moment's notice. It almost happened accidentally a few times - we came real close.
Good point on the cold war, yes am aware of more than a couple of occassions things almost kicked off. Probably not worth it but was inevitable that it or something like it would be invented eventually, much like smart phones.
http://nuclearfiles.org/menu/key-issues/...ar-war.htm
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/s...olina-1961
And I could write multiple paragraphs about all the technological advantages, but we know all that so I won't waste your time. Unfortunately, I think part of the price for all that is that we're going to have some of the issues you mention. If we were somehow able to magically get this perfect patriarchal society you seem to wish, I think the advance of technology would immediately begin pushing it back the other way.
With the above cold war we had MAD, a balance, on the tech side, we do not. The only real option is to not use it, dont feed the egos of the sub-standard women on dating apps but again we can agree male thirst is the root of all evil so I don’t see that happening anytime soon.
I personally see a balance being restored with the robot revolution and the very real possibility of having a robot girlfriend in the not too distant future. Who needs privileged Pattys fat ass and her issues when you can buy a nice obedient robot and who knows maybe have advanced models down the line that could actually bear you a child, its not outside the realms of possibility. We are men, we are the builders of society so some guys gonna invent it sooner or later, there is a very real need for this with the current SM imbalance. Would take away the reproductive monopoly and the sex monopoly with zero arguments to be made against it by the holier than though crowd as nobody gets hurt.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/...nd-7127554
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEzH40l-Dg8
Here's the thing though: just like there are no girls who are 100% "good" or 100% "bad", there are no 100% "healthy" societies or 100% "decadent" societies.
True and I agree, however water takes the shape of the container it fills and like children, if you don’t set boundaries for women then they will run rampant, the greater good is not on their radar at all
And also we were dropping atomic bombs, leveling entire cities, and sending thousands of young men off to kill other young men and die screaming for their mothers in some God-forsaken shithole. Young men killing other young men is not "good for men", at least not in any direct sense I'm able to contemplate.
Not good if you were the one sent to fight no, but wars acted as a safety valve on society numbers, it kept male thirst in check and fighting is a basic instinct for males, to protect whats ours and to best the man facing us to take the spoils, its hard wired into our DNA, why male competitive sports are so popular.
The West today? Yeah, there are problems. But there are a lot of great things about it. Violent crime in the US has been declining for 40 years. There's never really been a safer time to be alive.
Yes and it has made us soft. I would rather a more violent society with less government interference than a nanny state with an all encompassing surveillance and welfare programme that robs me of my privacy and right to self determination. Those who trade liberty for security deserve neither to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin.
I do know that if one believes one can't be happy until feminism is banished from the face of the Earth, well, the problem is not feminism.
I can be happy if we limit its influence and roll back misandry in the legal system, e.g. No fault divorce, I am realistic on this point although my ideal would be to see it consigned to the dustbin of history.
Every dollar put into funding a war is a dollar that could've been spent better on almost anything else.
An idealistic notion that says war is obsolete. We live under an elite that will pit us against each other to protect their place in society, it has always and will always be that way. I prefer to look at war like a volcanic eruption, it is necessary to both kill off the weak and soil the earth to breed new life in order for society to evolve.