Quote: (11-02-2016 09:15 AM)Jones Wrote:
Like Heidegger, he gets a bad rap because people like to associate his philosophy with inspiring Nazism, but it was actually Wagner that influenced Hitler more so. The main thing Nazi's and Nietzsche have in common is an appreciation of Wagner's work, but Hitler did cherry pick out some concepts found in Nietzsche and twist them to his own image - the übermensch (super-man, Hitler's "Aryan race") for example.
This kind of criticism of Nietzsche comes exactly from the kind of reasoning he condemned. Nietzsche certainly influenced Nazis, and Nazis didn't get Nietzsche wrong at all. There was nothing in Nietzsche's thought that in any way prevented it from being exploited by Nazis or any other power. Gun can be used by both kind and destructive people, and so can Nietzsche's philosophy.
The fact that Nazism is being connected to Nietzsche can be used by two kinds of people: Those who merely state the obvious, and from those who use Hitler as universal measure of evil, or in other words, morality. The latter are partisans.
If some people feel threatened by the way Nietzsche's philosophy can influence for example, modern nationalists, that's because they are in a way right. It can, because it works. It can because nothing is so specifically European as Nietzsche is.
BTW, Nietzsche turned highly critical of Wagner in the end, and condemned Romanticism altogether, a sentiment later resonated by Julius Evola, another philosopher i very much appreciate. Evola considered Romanticism as a natural continuation of bourgeoisie taste and worldview, and thought that Wagner has debased Nordic and Germanic lore and myths by clothing them in bourgeoisie world of sentiments, such as love for example.
Quote:Quote:
In addition: University philosophy is in censorship shambles; Freedom of thought through philosophical writing has been shut down. A piece, heavily founded in the philosophy of Julius Evola
Evola will never be studied or appreciated in Universities, since he was a staunch opponent of everything Universities represent today. Even if someone strictly limits himself to his works that deal with subject of religion, esotericism, metaphysics, etc, even they are full of his "general" philosophy, of masculine tradition, of unapologetic spiritual supremacy, of contempt for "humanity" and mediocrity.
Can anyone imagine a better compliment for a philosopher after all, but being rejected by Academia? I think Nietzsche would have desired such a post-mortem fate.