Divorce Court: Rich Dumbass Tries To Prove Wife Had Nothing To Do With Fortune
08-03-2011, 01:16 AMQuote:Quote:
A self-professed genius was banned from using scientific evidence during his divorce hearing to prove that he alone, through his 'unique personal traits', was responsible for accumulating a $450million fortune.
Billionaire Henry Silverman, from New York, wanted to prove to a judge that he is an 'innate genius' whose spouse Nancy had no part to play in his financial success.
But State Supreme Court judge Laura Drager rejected the evidence, which would have saved the 68-year-old a fortune.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z1TwZotMgl
His claim of genius is ridiculous based off the facts that he 1) chose to get to married and 2) is bagging some incredibly extra-average bitches.
![[Image: article-2021557-0D4579CD00000578-710_224x423.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/08/02/article-2021557-0D4579CD00000578-710_224x423.jpg)
![[Image: article-2021557-0D454E4300000578-723_224x423.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/08/02/article-2021557-0D454E4300000578-723_224x423.jpg)
Really? All that money and that's the best you can do?