I hate when women cheat on me "in real life."
Those bros ain't loyal.
Those bros ain't loyal.
Quote: (08-20-2018 05:56 AM)kazz Wrote:sorry for the late reply but that's the slang now and I pretty much hate it.....Girls saying bruh the n-word, and bro is a red flag for me but seems every girl does it
Why is he calling his girlfriend "Bro".
Quote: (08-20-2018 08:59 AM)MMM Wrote:
I hate when women cheat on me "in real life."
Those bros ain't loyal.
Quote: (08-19-2018 09:15 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:
I guess he wasn't alpha enough, he needs to take a RSD seminar.
Quote: (08-20-2018 07:05 AM)Roosh Wrote:
Quote: (08-20-2018 05:56 AM)kazz Wrote:
Why is he calling his girlfriend "Bro".
In my latest trip back to DC, I would sit in cafes and notice that young men were calling their female co-workers or friends "bro" repeatedly. Must be the new slang.
Quote:[url=https://twitter.com/MichaelPorfirio/status/1031536097812197376][/url]
Quote:Quote:
Not always, but often enough, when a man acts blasé upon discovering his gf cheated on him, it means he’s got side pieces and doesn’t care very much about his primary’s fidelity. Or, he could be a stone cold chronicler of slore perfidy, a man of focused mind and icy blood, who knows videotape evidence utterly exonerates him in the court of social opinion and ruins his whore’s reputation with any man worth having and with any woman worth befriending.
Cast to the cock holster wastelands, is she.
A twatterer asked TJ Laramie (a UFC fighter) why he didn’t smash the interloper male. His reply,
This video was worth way more than a charge
In Current Year Clown World — aka our dysfunctional Gynarcho-Tyranny — Laramie is right. This was the smart play. Public humiliation of a whore > State sponsored punishment for defending one’s property from an invading force.
Some understand the nature of the game:
You went about it correctly. Unless this guy knows you personally the anger needs to be placed on the person in connection with you.
***
When that dude walked in the house he knew another man lived there.
***
So did she.
Touché.
Realtalk that will upset the White Knight Wünderdorks: when a ho cheats, she owns the infraction. None of this “oh but he seduced me” or “he took advantage of me in a weak moment” crap. This is the dawning of the Age of Awakening. Men who are the least bit clued in to the rough and sleazy nature of Woman know that ye faire maidens are neither, and will willfully, voluntarily, gleefully cheat if circumstances and plausibly deniable hamster-fueled PR align for sexploitation.
Every man’s cold rage should primarily be directed at his cheating ho, secondarily at the cheating ho’s accessory to the gine crime. Women are the gatekeepers of sex, it’s always been that women exert ultimate control over who gains entry and who doesn’t, and women are especially and zealously discriminatory in their governance of that control.
So when a woman cheats, she meant to cheat, and she could have stopped herself at any moment leading up to the act. Laramie beating up the male accessory, while surely satisfying his primal urge for revenge, would have, absent complementary punishment of his ho, indirectly relieved her of some measure of guilt and agency, and established the peculiar precedent that whatever shit she pulls going forward will be met with his feeble anger deflated by depletion on the relatively more innocent party to the treachery.