[Suits]

(06-21-2016 12:04 AM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  

Because the top ten percent guys are fucking 90% of women.

And that includes married women.

That's not accurate.

The top 10% of men wouldn't touch 60% of women with a 10 foot pole.

The top 10% of men are extracting 80% of the sexual currency from women, but most of that sexual currency is coming from the top 20% of women, with a good bit also chipped in by the next 70-80 percentile as well.

If we limit the age range we are talking about to 18-28 year old women, then we get very different numbers, since most of the sexual currency comes from this age group. From 18-23, all a girl has to do is not be fat and she'll offer more sexual currency than 96% of 35 year olds and 99% of 40 year olds.

I've invented all of these numbers.

[Swedreams]

(06-20-2016 03:26 AM)Rawmeo Wrote:  

Because we try our best to do well in the society that we are in. We complain about the sluttification of girls, but since you cannot de-slutify a girl, better bang then than nothing.

IMO, in a perfect society, it should go this way: There are 100 male births for 100 females births (actually 101:100, but let's make a round figure).
Supposing that 3% of men are gay and 1% are asexual/bi, and 1% become priests / monks / etc. and won't get laid, this gives 95 males for 100 females.

There should therefore be 95 girls who will be virgins for those 95 men, and 5% of girls who not get a mate. This 5% will make the "spare" pool, where there will be prostitutes, mistresses, etc. and this way, there would be a society where every man is entitled to a brand new girl, while still having the possibility to fuck on the side.

Now a few things can influence the percentage like lesbians, etc. but you get the general idea.

Just hamstering here.

But then those 5% who can't even find a mate would be hideous and not mistress material. In your utopia, would you choose to only have one girl ever?

In my perfect society there would be a subset of sluts and a subset of good girls and they would tell you right away what they were.

[General Stalin]

While it is a troll, OP's resentful and spiteful remarks don't add up - he is cherry picking.

Western women are giving away easy pussy like it's going out of style, you just need to use proper game. I would say a solid player can get a lot more pussy a lot more quickly in American than, say, Ukraine. The difference is the basic charms it takes to impress women of more traditional cultures come more easily and naturally, as opposed to the hoops you have to jump through the get most American women into bed.

An American girl will fuck you in the club bathroom or in the alleyway next to the bar within 20 minutes of meeting you if all things are right - its our hookup culture that allows for that. But with the easy sex of independent liberated women, also comes the entitlement and idealism. American women want to have cool sex with fun, sexy, exciting guys. Sex is an experience just like going out with their guurrrls, traveling to another country, going to a music festival, etc.

[Satoshi]

What if I told you;
All girls are sluts.

[AnonymousBosch]

(06-19-2016 08:10 PM)G.S.T Wrote:  

^I'm not sure if I follow the analogy...

Next!

(06-19-2016 08:40 PM)G.S.T Wrote:  

Until then..keep your beta pie hole shut. Mmmkay?

Gamma detected.

[heavy]

The only valid point he is within miles of is articulating is actually a point we never mention here on the forum.

It's counterproductive to share stories of what works to get laid. If I found "the code" to getting laid, it would be directly counterproductive for me to share that code. Sure, there may be indirect reasons to share the code, such as money or fame or the mutual exchange of ideas (all reasons the manosphere does exist), but the intrinsic payoff of sharing the knowledge affords a negative impact for me on the sexual market, even if only slightly.

The sexual market is a zero-sum game. This is a point that we don't like at first glance. Many of us even here probably don't want to admit it. There are only so many girls to go around, only so many bangs, only so many first-times and second-times. When I pull a girl home from the bar, it necessarily means every other man did not. When Leo walks into the bar, the number of available women just decreased a bit.

This is another reason the dark triad exists. It's not only that women are attracted to narcissism, or psychos, or Machiavellianists. It's that those traits are required to take that which is a common good. The guy who doesn't care about taking home the chick all the other guys are drooling over is also he guy who's willing to steal from the coffers.

(Of course, we share for a variety of reasons. Older members teaching younger guys, camaraderie, shared views and thoughts about the world, the giving and receiving of info, etc)

[weambulance]

(06-22-2016 04:17 PM)heavy Wrote:  

The only valid point he is within miles of is articulating is actually a point we never mention here on the forum.

It's counterproductive to share stories of what works to get laid. If I found "the code" to getting laid, it would be directly counterproductive for me to share that code. Sure, there may be indirect reasons to share the code, such as money or fame or the mutual exchange of ideas (all reasons the manosphere does exist), but the intrinsic payoff of sharing the knowledge affords a negative impact for me on the sexual market, even if only slightly.

The sexual market is a zero-sum game. This is a point that we don't like at first glance. Many of us even here probably don't want to admit it. There are only so many girls to go around, only so many bangs, only so many first-times and second-times. When I pull a girl home from the bar, it necessarily means every other man did not. When Leo walks into the bar, the number of available women just decreased a bit.

This is another reason the dark triad exists. It's not only that women are attracted to narcissism, or psychos, or Machiavellianists. It's that those traits are required to take that which is a common good. The guy who doesn't care about taking home the chick all the other guys are drooling over is also he guy who's willing to steal from the coffers.

(Of course, we share for a variety of reasons. Older members teaching younger guys, camaraderie, shared views and thoughts about the world, the giving and receiving of info, etc)

You're strictly correct, but we don't talk about it partly because the effect on the SMP of sharing game knowledge is negligible. It's negligible for the same reason sharing workout knowledge doesn't really result in lots of competition from guys with newly improved bodies, nor does sharing general business knowledge often result in significantly increased business competition.

Why? Because the overwhelmingly vast majority of people are lazy as fuck and will either reject the knowledge or never apply it effectively, either through lack of will or simple inability. Self improvement is too hard for most people to pursue with much vigor.

The other reason I suspect many of us don't mind sharing what we know is we'd rather live in a world with more like minded people than bang yet one more easy slut than we might get otherwise.

[kaotic]

These last 2 comments by heavy and weambulance are gold.