[blacknwhitespade]

Just curious, seeing that Donald Trump is very popular on this board, hypothetically speaking, if he fades out and doesn't win the Republican nomination, who is your second choice?

[defguy]

Bernie Sanders

[Anabasis to Desta]

Rand Paul has always been my first choice.

I just hopped the Trump train so i can Scuba dive in liberal tears come November.



I admire him as a person but don't think he'll do much as President.

[captain_shane]

I'll just write in Trump.

Everyone else will be the destruction of America.

[MKDAWUSS]

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

[JacksonRev]

Fuck those cucks. Trump or we make a new Independence Day.

[captain_shane]

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

[Fast Eddie]

Sanders is literally the worst of all options. He is the furthest left of the democratic party. Whatever you hate about Hillary, aside from her being a woman, holds true for Sanders except to a much greater degree.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

No !Jeb on the list?

You bully!

[Only One Man]

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

This forum is not a place for hive mind thinking.

[Only One Man]

(01-29-2016 01:31 PM)Anabasis to Desta Wrote:  

Rand Paul has always been my first choice.

I just hopped the Trump train so i can Scuba dive in liberal tears come November.



I admire him as a person but don't think he'll do much as President.

This is basically where I am on this too. I just love the outrage from so many people and then the second round of outrage when he basically tells everyone to fuck themselves.

[captain_shane]

(01-29-2016 02:22 PM)Only One Man Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

This forum is not a place for hive mind thinking.

It's about being a man of self reliance.

If you support sanders, you support SJW's and losers that want to steal from the successful.

Like the poster above said, if you wouldn't vote for Hillary, then you'd be a fool to vote for Hernie.

[Troutslayer]

   

[It_is_my_time]

I would have said Rand Paul in the past, and not even given it a 2nd though. But he has exposed himself as petty and most likely just a controlled opposition attack dog for the elites. Why the hell is he bashing Trump, when he is on stage with guys far more opposed to his beliefs than Trump is. My guess is he was told to do so, or he is EXTREMELY petty.

Anyway, if we can't have Trump, then Bernie Sanders. Why? Because if we can't fix this thing, then let it all crumble down and Sanders will destroy it all the fastest. And it will be done after a proud socialist took over, so the blame will be easy to point out and fix afterwards.

[Aurini]

Sanders. If he country's going to collapse, let's make sure it happens under a Democratic president. I don't see any of the other Republicans making a meaningful difference.

Hillary's smart enough that she might be able to forestall things until 2020.

[DjembaDjemba]

I can't vote in US elections, but if I could it would be Bloomberg if he decides to run. I don't care for the rest.

[rw95]

(01-29-2016 03:02 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

Sanders. If he country's going to collapse, let's make sure it happens under a Democratic president. I don't see any of the other Republicans making a meaningful difference.

Hillary's smart enough that she might be able to forestall things until 2020.

Hilary would bring about World War III.

[DamienCasanova]

Trump or we riot!

Like I said in the Trump thread, if he doesn't get elected with the massive amount of support he has from average Joes toting guns and the armed forces, he could probably stage a military coup. He could easily be the leader of the biggest national militia since the American Revolution.

[Libertas]

I'm tempted to say Trump or bust, but Sanders, for two reasons - first to send a message to the globalists and set the precedent of yanking power away from their carefully selected choices, and second to create a rightist reaction for the next time. Also, at least he opposes foreign entanglements, unlike the rest of them.

Rand proved himself a yapping dog that fawns for his globalist masters while ostensibly opposing them. Nothing like his father.

[Dantes]

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

What values are you referring to? I know plenty of men in this community that are liberal minded who have game, a great lifestyle, and have been an asset to this forum.

One's politics isn't the determining factor in their inclusion or exclusion from this community. What made this Forum special and a community that I am proud of being part of, is the focus on Game, travel, lifestyle and self-improvement. Our political alignment will vary, but let's not make it a basis for one's place here.

[John Michael Kane]

I'm going to write-in Trump as an act of defiance against the existing GOP class, or vote Cruz because he is least likely to vote against guns, which we'll soon need at the rate of which it looks like civil unrest is becoming more and more likely.

[Fast Eddie]

(01-29-2016 03:29 PM)Dantes Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

What values are you referring to? I know plenty of men in this community that are liberal minded who have game, a great lifestyle, and have been an asset to this forum.

One's politics isn't the determining factor in their inclusion or exclusion from this community. What made this Forum special and a community that I am proud of being part of, is the focus on Game, travel, lifestyle and self-improvement. Our political alignment will vary, but let's not make it a basis for one's place here.

And how do you think a socialist bordering on bolshevik extreme-SJW like Sanders is going to impact our ability to game, travel, and improve our lot in life? It's hard to travel when you have no money, and it's hard to have money when the communist scourge takes it away from you to give to the parasites. As for game, look for your ability to approach and fuck strange women to be severely curtailed under a guy who shares (or at least wishes to implement) policies straight out of Jezebel.

[Traktor]

(01-29-2016 03:18 PM)rw95 Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 03:02 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

Sanders. If he country's going to collapse, let's make sure it happens under a Democratic president. I don't see any of the other Republicans making a meaningful difference.

Hillary's smart enough that she might be able to forestall things until 2020.

Hilary would bring about World War III.

Too fucking right. She is the WORST of all options. No words can describe how much I hate that woman. I am going with Sanders. I think he can and will take on the banksters in Wall Street if he gets in. My only beef with him is his pro Israel stance.

FUCK THE BANKERS, FUCK HILLARY, FUCK ISRAEL.

[Only One Man]

(01-29-2016 02:33 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:22 PM)Only One Man Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

This forum is not a place for hive mind thinking.

It's about being a man of self reliance.

If you support sanders, you support SJW's and losers that want to steal from the successful.

Like the poster above said, if you wouldn't vote for Hillary, then you'd be a fool to vote for Hernie.

Self reliance for us, absolutely. But you can't expect self reliance from children, the elderly, the disabled, the severely mentally ill, or the severely substance addicted. I think society is much better off when these people are taken care of as opposed to being out on the streets or completely dependent on charity from strangers.

In the case of addicts, it seems like a better idea to treat them and try to get them back to being functioning members of society instead of just throwing them in prison or having them end up on the streets as a common criminal. I'm tired of seeing and dealing with homeless people all the fucking time.

I'm not on team Bernie but supporting some of his rhetoric and policies doesn't make you an SJW supporter any more than being a Republican makes you a fundamentalist christian. Also, Bernie is much better than hillary regardless of where he stands on any issues because as far as I know, he isn't a puppet of the global elite/banksters.

[captain_shane]

(01-29-2016 04:11 PM)Only One Man Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:33 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:22 PM)Only One Man Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:17 PM)captain_shane Wrote:  

(01-29-2016 02:12 PM)MKDAWUSS Wrote:  

Sanders. I'm actually OK with a Sanders Presidency.

A sander's presidency is the exact opposite in values that this forum promotes. The exact opposite of neomasculinity.

This forum is not a place for hive mind thinking.

It's about being a man of self reliance.

If you support sanders, you support SJW's and losers that want to steal from the successful.

Like the poster above said, if you wouldn't vote for Hillary, then you'd be a fool to vote for Hernie.

Self reliance for us, absolutely. But you can't expect self reliance from children, the elderly, the disabled, the severely mentally ill, or the severely substance addicted. I think society is much better off when these people are taken care of as opposed to being out on the streets or completely dependent on charity from strangers.

In the case of addicts, it seems like a better idea to treat them and try to get them back to being functioning members of society instead of just throwing them in prison or having them end up on the streets as a common criminal. I'm tired of seeing and dealing with homeless people all the fucking time.

I'm not on team Bernie but supporting some of his rhetoric and policies doesn't make you an SJW supporter any more than being a Republican makes you a fundamentalist christian. Also, Bernie is much better than hillary regardless of where he stands on any issues because as far as I know, he isn't a puppet of the global elite/banksters.

Samseau posted a link that debunks your thoughts. He wants the Fed to endlessly print money until unemployment is below 4%.

The banks would love this man.

http://www.vox.com/2016/1/26/10829888/be...l-reserve.

He's an absolute fool. How can a man that's made 150k+ for countless years have a net worth of 600K?

And to your point about leaving people on the streets, how many veterans are on the streets right now even with our welfare state?

Bernie just wants to be Robin Hood. Banker's = Bad, Single Mother's and Degenerates = Good